Topic: "Do we have a tag for that" thread

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

electricitywolf said:
semi-anthro.

post #88044
So about a 4 on the ol' DoK scale? It's no Gatomon (does on-model Gatomon count?), but I suppose I can see it.

As I read it, the tag is used alongside anthro or feral. (Personal judgment would lean towards anthro since Audino isn't very animalistic. Is that right?)

OK, one more follow up question, then:
Do we have "x on semi-anthro" tags in situations like them? Should we start using them (more often)?

glyme said:
OK, one more follow up question, then:
Do we have "x on semi-anthro" tags in situations like them? Should we start using them (more often)?

Sort of, but I wouldn't suggest using them. You already need to tag x_on_anthro or x_on_feral with semi-anthro characters, so having x_on_semi-anthro in addition to that would add to tag bloat (especially as there'd be gender_on_form along with *_penetration_*, *_fingering_*, etc variations).

I dug, and I was surprised I couldn't find a tag that means furless_hands or unfurred_hands or something like that. It would mainly be mouse/rodent hands, but in the past I've seen artists who draw furries with only skin on their hands (mainly in some attempt at 'functional realism' since hands completely covered in fur or with "paw pads" would be less dexterous than human hands, also you'd get fur in everything you eat, in your paint if you're an artist, clay work would be a nightmare, etc)

post #2247471

Wondering if there's a tag for this kind of face.

popoto said:
I'm curious if there's a tag for wet clothing clinging to the skin.

popoto said:
Is there some sort of broad supernatural tag? You know, stuff covering the entirety of things like ghosts, vampires, ghouls, etc. Sort of like how we have monster_girl_(genre)?

An answer for either of these would be cool too.

Also this thread should probably be stickied

I looked and could not find a tag for "generic mascot/theme park costume", like https://e621.net/posts/9648 Mascot seems to mean actual iconic mascot, like Tony the Tiger or Charlie Tuna. mascot_costume only has 16 results so I consider it a dead/improper tag unless there's some agreement to use it. There's some tags for <species>_costume but they're not filled out either. Maybe a tag project, but I'm curious if there's a tag I missed.

I was actually tagging skunk images that aren't labeled striped/spotted/hognose. I see there's tags for eastern_spotted_skunk and other very precise species tags, but I think there is very very little art that would actually be clear enough to actually use those tags, they should probably be removed/aliased. Maybe lore tags, but even that seems kind of impossible to define, even if the character owner says it is that thing, if the art doesn't actually show any of the minutiae of species details it would be pointless.

Recently saw a unique tag "glans_pop". Isn't there already some tag related to pulling_out or unknotting that involves a sudden change in pressure/suction to make the 'pop'? Like, isn't there a horse-oriented tag similar to unknotting? I asked creator of tag and they gave me explanation. Later, I mentioned this topic, but creator hasn't responded in days.

For some reason this genre keeps showing up in bulk at random intervals. Since, it keeps getting approval despite the downvotes, it really ought to have tag if it doesn't already; but, What to even call this?

post #3281653

van0 said:
For some reason this genre keeps showing up in bulk at random intervals. Since, it keeps getting approval despite the downvotes, it really ought to have tag if it doesn't already; but, What to even call this?

post #3281653

queen's_stallion

It's a species tag.

Is there a tag for situations in images like these three posts where a character in the image is asking the viewer or another character for something? I know there's talking_to_viewer and question (which might be combined to make "asking_viewer" or something similar) as well as begging, but I feel like none of these images constitute full-on begging; they seem like gentle requests. Is it still considered begging? Could it be propositioning, or is that supposed to be used only for sexual propositions? Should there be a "request" tag for characters asking other characters to do something?

Also related to the last of the posts I listed at the beginning, is there a tag for posts like these where the character is asking to be milked? Is there a "milking_request" tag for such images?

wat8548 said:
As is often the case, Pixiv is years ahead of us.

Table and Corner are both too vague--while a side could still be considered a corner, usually it's the corner of three sides that people refer to as a corner, and it's done with other furniture too.

Do we have a tag or a tag combination to filter posts that features a small penetrator and a big penetrated? We have larger_penetrated but in the wiki, it said "much bigger". And I was looking at this post and wondering whether it could be tagged with it. If not, do we have a more general tag that indicates the penetrator is smaller than the one penetrated?

Is there a tag for when a character is submissive, bound and their cock is ready to be used/being used by a group of people? All I get when trying to search is stuff that isnt that. The closest tag I could find is "service_top" but it doesnt have many posts. Its such a hot scenario its a shame

dinbyy said:
Is there a tag for when a character is submissive, bound and their cock is ready to be used/being used by a group of people? All I get when trying to search is stuff that isnt that. The closest tag I could find is "service_top" but it doesnt have many posts. Its such a hot scenario its a shame

Seems like imminent_reverse_gangbang would apply (if the group is actually present), but it only has 2 uses right now and neither is what you said...

post #3217923
It's a rather subtle instance but the last two panels both have a depth_of_field effect where the "focus" changes to, well, focus on the speaking character, while the framing stays the same. This mimics the cinematographic technique known as focus pull, pull focus, or rack focus, probably among other names. The latter two might not make good tags because they resemble solo_focus, female_focus, etc, but is focus_pull something that should be tagged? Or is there already a tag for this effect?

I like stuff like that, and tag it when I think of it, but I don't know if anyone else cares.

watchdog22 said:
Do we have a tag or a tag combination to filter posts that features a small penetrator and a big penetrated? We have larger_penetrated but in the wiki, it said "much bigger". And I was looking at this post and wondering whether it could be tagged with it. If not, do we have a more general tag that indicates the penetrator is smaller than the one penetrated?

small_dom_big_sub is probably what you're thinking of, and the post you linked is already tagged with it

watchdog22 said:
Do we have a tag or a tag combination to filter posts that features a small penetrator and a big penetrated? We have larger_penetrated but in the wiki, it said "much bigger". And I was looking at this post and wondering whether it could be tagged with it. If not, do we have a more general tag that indicates the penetrator is smaller than the one penetrated?

small_dom_big_sub is probably what you're thinking of, and the post you linked is already tagged with it

small_dom_big_sub doesn't indicate who is the penetrator, post #3252192

Also, I find small_top_big_bottom, which is more percise but not widly used.

watchdog22 said:
Do we have a tag or a tag combination to filter posts that features a small penetrator and a big penetrated? We have larger_penetrated but in the wiki, it said "much bigger". And I was looking at this post and wondering whether it could be tagged with it. If not, do we have a more general tag that indicates the penetrator is smaller than the one penetrated?

if size_difference can be applied to a post than smaller_penetrated or larger_penetrated should also be applicable.

watchdog22 said:
Also, I find small_top_big_bottom, which is more percise but not widly used.

It has conflicting meanings, depending on what "top" and "bottom" is intended to mean. "Top" can refer to the physical top, or the penetrating character, and "bottom" can refer to the physical bottom, or the penetrated character. It can literally mean its own opposite between the two meanings (a small character being penetrated that's physically on top). Other top/bottom tags have this issue too of sometimes referring to physical top/bottom, while other times penetrating/penetrated, and no amount of wiki clarification helps (and no matter which way it's specified to be, that leaves the other meaning without tags).

small_dom_big_sub isn't correct in either case for the general concept of a small character penetrating a big character, because penetration is not inherently sub/dom (bdsm) play without something more. Though even there, I keep seeing plenty of mistags with small_dom_big_sub and big_dom_small_sub (which implicates dominant) for plain old sex.

Perhaps small_penetrating_big (and big_penetrating_small) with smaller_on_top (and bigger_on_top) would work to clarify the two meanings.

watsit said:
It has conflicting meanings, depending on what "top" and "bottom" is intended to mean. "Top" can refer to the physical top, or the penetrating character, and "bottom" can refer to the physical bottom, or the penetrated character. It can literally mean its own opposite between the two meanings (a small character being penetrated that's physically on top).

In wiki seems this one is specified for the penetrating/penetrated condition, if the wiki doesn't help, will we get a penalty when using small_top_big_bottom tag on small_penetrating_big post?

Couldn't figure if there's a tag or way to filter for full on anal kissing instead of just rimming with tongue, also a way to filter for nibbling on equine/donut holes. anal_kiss is for two holes touching, not lips on the hole. Also anal sucking, too, though that one's hard to convey non-animated.

Also a friend pointed this one out to me and asked me to post about it, do we/should we have a tag for prostate_on_the_wrong_side like https://e621.net/posts/3175797

popoto said:
post #3372978

wondering if there's a tag for that mouth thing/expression the purple cat is doing. You see it in anime too.

spit-take, probably. Might also be the thing where the ghost leaves through their mouth; don't know how to tag that, though.

is there a tag for when the top during a blowjob grabs the bottom's head and pulls them deeper on their dick? it feels like such a common and basic tag but i've never seen it. the closest i've ever seen is forced_oral or rough_sex, but it almost never describes it well because it's an consensual blowjob where the top gets just slightly domineering

dildo_sitting implicates penetration, but there's quite a few posts where the character isn't penetrated by a dildo, just kneeling or crouching over it. Is there a tag for that? If not, I'll start tagging it with sitting_over_dildo.

waydence said:
dildo_sitting implicates penetration, but there's quite a few posts where the character isn't penetrated by a dildo, just kneeling or crouching over it. Is there a tag for that? If not, I'll start tagging it with sitting_over_dildo.

crouching_over_dildo

may work better, since sitting implies having your butt on something (or moving down to be on something). If someone's butt is lifted to just above the dildo, they're not sitting.

watsit said:
crouching_over_dildo may work better, since sitting implies having your butt on something (or moving down to be on something). If someone's butt is lifted to just above the dildo, they're not sitting.

dildo_sitting is applied regardless of character's pose: crouching, or kneeling, or what else. The point point is that the dildo is resting on a surface, and their pussy (anus etc) is resting on the dildo. sitting_over_dildo would follow that pattern. crouching_over_dildo sounds a little more specific.

Edit: I like the idea of being more specific though, why not have dildo_kneeling and dildo_crouching and so on for more specific poses? Have them imply dildo sitting and kneeling (or crouching), this can be useful.

Updated

Is there a tag for crocodilian hands? Crocodiles [and some dinosaurs] have three clawed fingers and two clawless fingers on each hand. I haven't really seen any posts with these [except a select few] but I'd like to know for the future, for tagging purposes.

moonlit-comet said:
Is there a tag for crocodilian hands? Crocodiles [and some dinosaurs] have three clawed fingers and two clawless fingers on each hand. I haven't really seen any posts with these [except a select few] but I'd like to know for the future, for tagging purposes.

Well TIL. Most likely not, I think you can just start tagging it. Worst-case scenario, an alias will have to be created.

waydence said:
Well TIL. Most likely not, I think you can just start tagging it. Worst-case scenario, an alias will have to be created.

Alright. Now the problem comes of what to tag them as. lol
"Crocodilian hands" seems fine but doesn't always apply to only crocodilians.

moonlit-comet said:
Alright. Now the problem comes of what to tag them as. lol
"Crocodilian hands" seems fine but doesn't always apply to only crocodilians.

Seems fitting enough for now, it can always be aliased away later if a better term pops up.

huhu ^^
Is there a tag for this kind of septum piercings/ the form of piercing itself?
post #3409140 post #3405256 post #3405669 post #3408001

At first, I found horseshoe_barbell and added it to two, or three posts.
Then I thought horseshoe_piercing would be more fitting/intuitive, I added it to a couple more posts, but I am still not 100% sure, if I should use it. Maybe there is a more common name for it.
And then I was thinking,"maybe there is a fitting tag for it, if it is on the septum" maybe septum_horseshoe_piercing, or simply septum_horseshoe.

dubsthefox said:
huhu ^^
Is there a tag for this kind of septum piercings/ the form of piercing itself?
post #3409140 post #3405256 post #3405669 post #3408001

At first, I found horseshoe_barbell and added it to two, or three posts.
Then I thought horseshoe_piercing would be more fitting/intuitive, I added it to a couple more posts, but I am still not 100% sure, if I should use it. Maybe there is a more common name for it.
And then I was thinking,"maybe there is a fitting tag for it, if it is on the septum" maybe septum_horseshoe_piercing, or simply septum_horseshoe.

There's also some overlap with barbell_piercing, since they have the little studs at the end (see also nipple_barbell). Given the latter tag, and for consistency's sake, the tag could be septum_barbell (or maybe septum_circular_barbell to avoid ambiguity.

Do we have a tag for a male with breasts? And not moobs, that tag(even while using a -[tag(s)] tag) shows up with unappealing posts. I am pretty sure whatever I am thinking of is something similar to intersex, but intersex is a bit broader than what I am thinking of.

Also, really odd one, are there any posture-related tags(i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis, posture-correctors, posture chairs, asymmetrical vertebrae in an x-ray(one end(whether front/back or left/right) is shorter than it's supposed to be and one end is taller).)?

ultrameow said:
Do we have a tag for a male with breasts? And not moobs, that tag(even while using a -[tag(s)] tag) shows up with unappealing posts. I am pretty sure whatever I am thinking of is something similar to intersex, but intersex is a bit broader than what I am thinking of.

Also, really odd one, are there any posture-related tags(i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis, posture-correctors, posture chairs, asymmetrical vertebrae in an x-ray(one end(whether front/back or left/right) is shorter than it's supposed to be and one end is taller).)?

Formerly tags like shemale or dickgirl, but because those terms were slang and so easily used solely for slander, they got replaced by gynomorph, a sciency term that can no longer be "solely" used for such purposes. Sadly, some rats will always try to use things rudely, but we've got to make our stand somewhere--some people like it so it's not a "has to be bad" thing.

Updated

A few questions related to this pic
post #3436130
1. What is the headgear she's wearing called?
2. Is there a tag for this background/canvas that was made to look like paper?

g273435d said:
Is there a name for this expression?
post #3452415

Besides looking_at_viewer/staring_at_viewer?

So, looking at this one: https://e621.net/posts/1912286?q=fight_club_%28disambiguation%29
*changes it to Street_fighter* (just kidding)
Fight might be right tag but I'm not sure there IS a right tag. Was just glancing through here and saw some like that: https://e621.net/tags?commit=Search&page=11&search%5Bhide_empty%5D=1&search%5Bname_matches%5D=%2A_%28disambiguation%29&search%5Border%5D=count
It's certainly not fight_club (the movie), but fight_club literal definition in dictionary makes sense.

waydence said:
penis_backwards

thanks! i wouldn'tve ever figured out that one myself, and after combing through post's tags with order:score, i doubt most people who tag even know this exists

honestly if i could come up with a better name i would make an alias in a heart beat

dripen_arn said:
thanks! i wouldn'tve ever figured out that one myself, and after combing through post's tags with order:score, i doubt most people who tag even know this exists

honestly if i could come up with a better name i would make an alias in a heart beat

I'm still not sure of the name of the facial expression.

watsit said:
crouching_over_dildo may work better, since sitting implies having your butt on something (or moving down to be on something). If someone's butt is lifted to just above the dildo, they're not sitting.

Surprised no one recommended imminent_dildo_sitting, haha.

alphamule said:
Surprised no one recommended imminent_dildo_sitting, haha.

Because it could also apply to something like after_dildo_sitting, after it had been used not just before/imminent use.

watsit said:
Because it could also apply to something like after_dildo_sitting, after it had been used not just before/imminent use.

Well, I was trying to make a joke but that makes sense, yeah...