Topic: "Do we have a tag for that" thread

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

Hello! Looking for a tag for a specific thing.

Sex or reinsertion of penis after already cumming inside or again type of thing. Cant find any specific art or comics Like this

thegreatwolfgang said:
Oh, that's odd. The Demogorgon is the creature that appears in the Stranger Things (TV show).
https://strangerthings.fandom.com/wiki/The_Demogorgon

They look very similar but not related to the Death Angels from A Quiet Place (movie)
https://aquietplace.fandom.com/wiki/Death_Angels

I'm just looking for a tag for these type of flower head/maws.

So a multi-flap spread-to-open mouth? I don't know of any tag for it, but I can at least propose flap_mouth.

electricitywolf said:
We need a tag for taurs with genitals on the front.

I'd support making a tag like that. If you're volunteering to make an initial set, you can find some more examples with unusual_genitalia_placement taur (content: body horror) and multi_genitalia taur.
Not sure what to call it, though. Maybe penis_in_front_groin? Is there a taur-specific term to distinguish the front crotch from the rear crotch?

Edit: I see you asked first at topic #32382. chironean_taur sounds like it should be reserved for taurs with front human legs. Possibly call it chironean_penis to be more specific.

Updated

matrixmash said:
I'd support making a tag like that. If you're volunteering to make an initial set, you can find some more examples with unusual_genitalia_placement taur (content: body horror) and multi_genitalia taur.
Not sure what to call it, though. Maybe penis_in_front_groin? Is there a taur-specific term to distinguish the front crotch from the rear crotch?

Edit: I see you asked first at topic #32382. chironean_taur sounds like it should be reserved for taurs with front human legs. Possibly call it chironean_penis to be more specific.

What if they only have a front groin penis, and not a back one though

furrin_gok said:
What if they only have a front groin penis, and not a back one though

If you're referring to my suggestion for pulling a starting set from multi_genitalia taur, yeah, that's an incomplete set.

If you mean that penis_in_front_groin or chironean_penis sound like they imply two penises... hmm. I'm not sure. Ideally, you could find taurs with only front penis as chironean_genitalia -multi_genitalia, but that assumes people will actually keep up with the tag after electricitywolf creates it. And this doesn't address if another penis placement becomes common enough to merit a tag. OTOH, I really don't want to make a tag for penis_in_normal_groin--that would definitely be tag bloat.

matrixmash said:
If you're referring to my suggestion for pulling a starting set from multi_genitalia taur, yeah, that's an incomplete set.

If you mean that penis_in_front_groin or chironean_penis sound like they imply two penises... hmm. I'm not sure. Ideally, you could find taurs with only front penis as chironean_genitalia -multi_genitalia, but that assumes people will actually keep up with the tag after electricitywolf creates it. And this doesn't address if another penis placement becomes common enough to merit a tag. OTOH, I really don't want to make a tag for penis_in_normal_groin--that would definitely be tag bloat.

Front groin definitely makes more sense than "Normal groin", but I like chironean_genitalia better than the mouthful that is penis_in_front_groin.
That said, if the taur's "humanoid" or anthro portion ends at the waist, they wouldn't be considered to have a front groin nor be chironean, which becomes its own think. We could have tauric_chest_genitalia but what about something to encompass both as an umbrella?
Assuming again these even end up common enough to care.

furrin_gok said:
Front groin definitely makes more sense than "Normal groin", but I like chironean_genitalia better than the mouthful that is penis_in_front_groin.
That said, if the taur's "humanoid" or anthro portion ends at the waist, they wouldn't be considered to have a front groin nor be chironean, which becomes its own think. We could have tauric_chest_genitalia but what about something to encompass both as an umbrella?
Assuming again these even end up common enough to care.

Maybe tauric_chest_genitalia could work, but dicknipples and pussy_nipples are technically chest genitalia too. Taurs can have dicknipples, pussy_nipples and/or any other thing an artist might come up with. The tag tauric_chest_genitalia could be confusing to some.

So I don't have to filter so many artists is there a tag that can apply to "bara" art in the future?

jessvello said:
So I don't have to filter so many artists is there a tag that can apply to "bara" art in the future?

The tag bara -> barazoku already exists and is used for muscular japanese gay porn. Does that sound like what you want or do you mean some other kind of "bara"?

I hate filtering artists in case they make something that does mesh with my niche kinks, but I'm trying to figure out what tags to use to filter implied scat where there's no actual scat or even 'residue' drawn, just brown shading. https://e621.net/posts?tags=momiji-kun

A few of the replies on the posts comment that they're intentionally trolling people by coloring it that way and claiming it's their skin/fur color so it won't get tagged scat. I see dirty_anus, dirty_fur and implied_scat but they have very low numbers. implied_scat is the most used one, but I don't want to start a tag war.

jessvello said:
So I don't have to filter so many artists is there a tag that can apply to "bara" art in the future?

matrixmash said:
The tag bara -> barazoku already exists and is used for muscular japanese gay porn. Does that sound like what you want or do you mean some other kind of "bara"?

barazoku is probably your best bet, though you may need to filter body shapes to skip (subjectively) mistagged pics.

A dedicated tag for characters with non-dexterous\useless hands would be nice. The name can be debated. You would think winged_arms or the handpaw tag would get you that but it simply does not. It's very hard to find images similar to these without a more dedicated tag for it:
https://e621.net/posts/2584012
https://e621.net/posts/1828266
https://e621.net/posts/2554437
You usually have to combine quite a few tags to get close. Transformation being a good one, but plenty exist without transformation.

dubsthefox said:
Do we have a tag for, a penis looking out of pants like this, while the balls are still covered.
post #3154101 post #3155172 post #3144070
I want to create a new project on tagme.dev, therefore I'd need a single tag and not a combination.

There's poking_out, then the sub-tags penis_through_fly, sheath_through_fly, open_pants, and penis_through_leghole

With the low numbers, definitely needs some tag work.

kevsnowcat said:
I hate filtering artists in case they make something that does mesh with my niche kinks, but I'm trying to figure out what tags to use to filter implied scat where there's no actual scat or even 'residue' drawn, just brown shading. https://e621.net/posts?tags=momiji-kun

A few of the replies on the posts comment that they're intentionally trolling people by coloring it that way and claiming it's their skin/fur color so it won't get tagged scat. I see dirty_anus, dirty_fur and implied_scat but they have very low numbers. implied_scat is the most used one, but I don't want to start a tag war.

Still curious what to do here. I feel like I should pre-emptively get a mod to look at this and pick a tag to lock onto it. It's annoying because I like some of the pics, but since he's intentionally 'not drawing scat' it almost needs an artist_attempting_to_avoid_scat_tag tag.

kevsnowcat said:
Still curious what to do here. I feel like I should pre-emptively get a mod to look at this and pick a tag to lock onto it. It's annoying because I like some of the pics, but since he's intentionally 'not drawing scat' it almost needs an artist_attempting_to_avoid_scat_tag tag.

filth might be a good fit. The wiki definition is vague enough it's probably valid for images that aren't dirty, but are clearly meant to look dirty, like the linked images.

Do we have a tag for uncomfortable poses? e.g. in bondage situations? The tag uncomfortable doesn't have a wiki entry yet. But it seems like it is used for the emotion and not for the situation.

dubsthefox said:
you can order them from wide and short to tall and thin: order:landscape, or from tall and thin to wide and short: order:portrait

Wow, that's an actually useful way to do it. Bonus: You can sort by ratio you want by using binary search, right? That is, jumping a bunch of pages until you find the first one with in the range, then back a bit until back out of it, and so on.

Is there a tag for when a character's panty straps (for lack of a better word) are visible above a low-rise waistline? Like this:

post #1763773

I tried the obvious guesses and none of them autocompleted.

errorist said:
Is there a tag for when a character's panty straps (for lack of a better word) are visible above a low-rise waistline? Like this:

post #1763773

I tried the obvious guesses and none of them autocompleted.

Looks like there isn't. Just 'waistband' in general only has 88 results. Surprised, actually, that exposed_waistband isn't even a tag at all, nevermind a low one.

hungrymaple said:
thong straps?

That's definitely what I was looking for, but maybe it should be renamed, since "thong" implies lack of butt coverage, something that we couldn't possibly know in any picture that qualifies for the tag.

kuray said:
I swear I've seen a similar tag before, but is there a tag for one character holding and using a smaller character like a living sex toy/onahole?

Example, something like this: https://e621.net/pools/21080

The problematic part about this is the being used part. Closest to that is living_sex_toy_use, but that includes all sex toys and seems to be a bit undertagged. I'm sure you could narrow it down with adding other stuff to the search, of course.

Might want to try this

living_condom

Though these two might also be worthwhile.
living_sex_toy
living_onahole

popoto said:
The problematic part about this is the being used part. Closest to that is living_sex_toy_use, but that includes all sex toys and seems to be a bit undertagged. I'm sure you could narrow it down with adding other stuff to the search, of course.

Might want to try this

living_condom

Though these two might also be worthwhile.
living_sex_toy
living_onahole

sparklechomp said:
Thereโ€™s fleshlight_position and reverse_fleshlight_position, which might fit what youโ€™re describing?

Those definitely help, thanks ^^

faucet said:
is there a tag for when the fur colors are split down the middle like this?

There is split_color, though it's not widely used and encompasses more than just two tones separated down the middle.

sparklechomp said:
Do we have a tag for when a character is wearing a belt and itโ€™s likeโ€ฆ lopsided? IDK the word. Or like wearing it loose rather than in the belt loops

Searching the tags index for anything with "belt" in it and there doesn't seem to be anything commonly used but there is loose_belt which has a couple of belts like that, waist_belt might fit some of those, and crossed_belts has only a single post. None of them have a wiki page either.

So nothing really searchable at the moment

mystery_rodent said:
Searching the tags index for anything with "belt" in it and there doesn't seem to be anything commonly used but there is loose_belt which has a couple of belts like that, waist_belt might fit some of those, and crossed_belts has only a single post. None of them have a wiki page either.

So nothing really searchable at the moment

Loose belt seems pretty accurate, so I think Iโ€™ll probably add that of my list of tags to work on growing and adding a wiki for

Edit: Crossed belts too

matrixmash said:
fisting or fingering, usually.

Those also apply to masturbation, not just one character doing it to another as with handjob. And vaginal stimulation doesn't have to be a result of fingering or fisting (rubbing the outer labia around the clitoris works too).

watsit said:
Those also apply to masturbation, not just one character doing it to another as with handjob. And vaginal stimulation doesn't have to be a result of fingering or fisting (rubbing the outer labia around the clitoris works too).

I was looking threw the tags and it even had "clitoral fingering" as a related tag and that just doesn't sound right to me given personally fingering implicates insertion to me.

randomguy-_- said:
Is there a tag for the artist mollowmollow / ่ซธใ€… or any info on the dnp page?

There's no artist or tag by either of those names and they're not listed on the DNP. You can easily search Artists & Tags if you want to check for yourself in the future and the DNP list is here

It'd still be best to get permission from the artist first though.

Consider the "shoelace" type piercing on this character's left ear:
post #1822379
The closest tag I could find is corset_piercing, but that implies surface_piercing, which is wrong here. Do we have a generic tag like laced_piercings? Should I create one? Or just leave it untagged.
Edit: I also found linked_piercing but that also clearly doesn't match the intent.

Updated

Is there a tag for when electrostimulation is across the chest? Like, unsafe_electrosex? :-D OK, that one is just being silly but you get the idea.

Impending_death seems somehow not appropriate.

It's become a trope/meme/cliche that some user points out that OMG THAT'S DANGEROUS! Because unfortunately, there's always that one idiot that jumps straight into the dry swimming pool's deep end.

I suspect something like electrical_hazard would be abused like crazy. Electrocution, technically applies? Bah

circeus said:
Figured this would do better than the overly generic "new tag discussions" thread now that there's a separate new tag announcements.

Is there/should there be a tag for characters wearing...

Socks and no shoes? Thankfully socks does not implicate footwear, but socks -footwear encompasses a broader range of legwear than what I'm talking about.
post #1144240 post #1149655 post #1145342 post #908433

Shoes and no socks?
post #926729 post #1127258 post #1114910 post #1082992

Do we have a tag for "Kitsune" that does not autocorrect to "Fox"?

A Kitsune is a japanese folklore creature with many tails. A Fox is a real-world animal with one tail. They're clearly different enough to warrant different tags.

I can understand tagging Kitsunes as also Foxes and Canines and Vulpines, but to completely replace Kitsune with Fox like that? Come on! What's next, will you change all dragons to Lizard?

phoenixrisesinbed69 said:
Do we have a tag for "Kitsune" that does not autocorrect to "Fox"?

A Kitsune is a japanese folklore creature with many tails. A Fox is a real-world animal with one tail. They're clearly different enough to warrant different tags.

I can understand tagging Kitsunes as also Foxes and Canines and Vulpines, but to completely replace Kitsune with Fox like that? Come on! What's next, will you change all dragons to Lizard?

A ็‹ is a mythological creature in the same way that a ็Œซ is a mythological creature: they're not, they're just extremely broad categories of animals. ๅฆ–็‹ and ๅŒ–ใ‘็Œซ, however, are mythological creatures.
fox_spirit will get you what you want.

phoenixrisesinbed69 said:
Do we have a tag for "Kitsune" that does not autocorrect to "Fox"?

A Kitsune is a japanese folklore creature with many tails. A Fox is a real-world animal with one tail. They're clearly different enough to warrant different tags.

I can understand tagging Kitsunes as also Foxes and Canines and Vulpines, but to completely replace Kitsune with Fox like that? Come on! What's next, will you change all dragons to Lizard?

You can hit the "Reply" button at the bottom of the page, as pointed out here and avoid copying a link.

"Kitsune" is just the Japanese word for Fox. Having multi_tails alone isn't enough to change that, but if it's displaying something that makes it clear it's a fox spirit, then like Lafcadio pointed out:

lafcadio said:
fox_spirit will get you what you want.

Is there a tag for that smirk that doms do in... probably most art? Like dom_smirk. I know smirk probably exists but that would cover all smirks, dom or not.

I don't know if there's an opposite of this thread, so I'll just ask here.

What's the point of the game_media tag? Most of it seems to be based on the presence of a video game console or cartridge, whether or not anyone's using it, and whether or not in-game visuals are depicted (which makes it seem redundant to me). A few are just gameplay (like post #3236253, although I don't know whether that will be approved) or images or animations taken from a game (which is what I would guess the tag would mean). But then some posts with the tag are just video game characters with nothing specifically game-y about the post.

There's no wiki page, so if this tag has a point at all, what is it?

deleuzian_cattery said:
I don't know if there's an opposite of this thread, so I'll just ask here.

What's the point of the game_media tag? Most of it seems to be based on the presence of a video game console or cartridge, whether or not anyone's using it, and whether or not in-game visuals are depicted (which makes it seem redundant to me). A few are just gameplay (like post #3236253, although I don't know whether that will be approved) or images or animations taken from a game (which is what I would guess the tag would mean). But then some posts with the tag are just video game characters with nothing specifically game-y about the post.

There's no wiki page, so if this tag has a point at all, what is it?

I would say gaming hardware. Controllers, cartridges, consoles, etc.

dubsthefox said:
I would say gaming hardware. Controllers, cartridges, consoles, etc.

Cartridges could be considered media (as in "storage media") but hardware in general is just...not what that word means. Do we even need a supercategory for different kinds of gaming hardware? and if so, why not make it gaming_hardware?
(Also pointing out that that is effectively what topic #29801 is arguing video_games should be, although that doesn't seem to be going anywhere.)

Do we have a tag for when something is sucked into an anus, in the same manner as might be sucked with the mouth? I've seen it in a few anal vore pictures.

Note that I'm specifically referring to suction as a bodily function, and not assisted insertion with something like an enema.

Is there some sort of broad supernatural tag? You know, stuff covering the entirety of things like ghosts, vampires, ghouls, etc. Sort of like how we have monster_girl_(genre)?

Is there a tag for when a species is drawn incorrectly? Not animal penis vs human penis, but when an artist has no idea what the animal looks like so you end up with https://www.furaffinity.net/view/12222761/

Or things like lions with large, triangular ears, which for TWYS would technically make them a "hybrid" since it could either be canine ears or domestic felid ears.

kevsnowcat said:
Is there a tag for when a species is drawn incorrectly? Not animal penis vs human penis, but when an artist has no idea what the animal looks like so you end up with https://www.furaffinity.net/view/12222761/

Or things like lions with large, triangular ears, which for TWYS would technically make them a "hybrid" since it could either be canine ears or domestic felid ears.

Try anatomically_inaccurate. The wiki sounds almost exactly like what you're looking for.

matrixmash said:
Try anatomically_inaccurate. The wiki sounds almost exactly like what you're looking for.

Looks like it automatically isn't allowed for anthros, only ferals. A quad dog with a human penis would be wrong, but an anthro isn't. Also the post connected to that is just a huge low-grade flame war. Maybe not something to mess with now that I see that.

kevsnowcat said:
Looks like it automatically isn't allowed for anthros, only ferals. A quad dog with a human penis would be wrong, but an anthro isn't. Also the post connected to that is just a huge low-grade flame war. Maybe not something to mess with now that I see that.

An anthro canine can have a humanoid, canine, or hybridized human-canine cock, but I feel like it having a cat's penis would be inaccurate still.

electricitywolf said:
post #911104 post #117612 post #949035 post #1233746
We need a tag for taurs with genitals on the front.

furrin_gok said:
Front groin definitely makes more sense than "Normal groin", but I like chironean_genitalia better than the mouthful that is penis_in_front_groin.
That said, if the taur's "humanoid" or anthro portion ends at the waist, they wouldn't be considered to have a front groin nor be chironean, which becomes its own think. We could have tauric_chest_genitalia but what about something to encompass both as an umbrella?
Assuming again these even end up common enough to care.

Seems like tauric_chest_genitalia is the best idea so far.

electricitywolf said:
Maybe tauric_chest_genitalia could work, but dicknipples and pussy_nipples are technically chest genitalia too. Taurs can have dicknipples, pussy_nipples and/or any other thing an artist might come up with. The tag tauric_chest_genitalia could be confusing to some.

But so are many other tags and the wiki exists for a reason.