BlueDingo said:
[...]

searching for "*shoulder*" didn't bring up anything, so i believe you have the freedom to name a new tag.

fewrahuxo said:
searching for "*shoulder*" didn't bring up anything, so i believe you have the freedom to name a new tag.

Hmm... I was thinking object_over_shoulder but that would be too broad sounding. TV Tropes calls this pose Weapon Across The Shoulder so we could make the tag weapon_over_shoulder or weapon_across_shoulder but then we'd have to add a line on the wiki page saying it can apply to things other than weapons (the baseball bat example).

Edit: Going with weapon_on_shoulder.

Ruku said:
dusted_shoulders ?

https://www.google.com/#q=dusted look at section 2
https://www.google.com/search?q=dusted+shoulders&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiIouyr_-DTAhVnwlQKHZ0XAFsQ_AUIBigB&biw=1280&bih=637#imgrc=eA9ikcsSTXqd9M:

could apply the same for other body parts like tail of head...

I also thought about using 'dusted', but I leaded to the conclusion that it wouldn't be exactly what we are looking for.

I) 'dusted' may mean either, covered with dust or cleaned to remove dust.

II) 'dusted' is directly linked to 'dust' which don't include snow or wood shavings for example.

However it may be a possibility if we don't think in something better.

Is there a tag for a character enjoying the cum blastoff from their partner? As in shooting far as a projectile.

post #1210727
Do we have a tag for a character having eyes in the back of their head?

Furrin_Gok said:
Do we have a tag for a character having eyes in the back of their head?

Searching the wiki for "eyes back head" returned no useful results, so I doubt it.

Rear_sighted :p

post #1211559
Anything for when two characters are sleeping or cuddling together, facing one another? Essentially the opposite of spooning.

Furrin_Gok said:
post #1211559
Anything for when two characters are sleeping or cuddling together, facing one another? Essentially the opposite of spooning.

It seems to be just a hug, but involving characters lying on a surface instead of standing (however isn't so easy to identify without arms).

Furrin_Gok said:
post #1211559
Anything for when two characters are sleeping or cuddling together, facing one another? Essentially the opposite of spooning.

Why does it need a name? It's basically cuddling.

O16 said:
It seems to be just a hug, but involving characters lying on a surface instead of standing (however isn't so easy to identify without arms).

Essentially what spooning is--a hug, from behind, while lying.

Sorrowless said:
Why does it need a name? It's basically cuddling.

Front to back and front to side are "Just cuddling" too, but we have spooning for front-to-back. Why not have an actual tag for front to front? Something that Missionary position could imply same as spoon position.

Furrin_Gok said:
Front to back and front to side are "Just cuddling" too, but we have spooning for front-to-back. Why not have an actual tag for front to front? Something that Missionary position could imply same as spoon position.

Yes, but front to front cuddling can be found by removing spooning from the search.

Sorrowless said:
Yes, but front to front cuddling can be found by removing spooning from the search.

Except for front-to-side and undertagged spoonings.

We could use front and side cuddling but I don't think it's a big deal to not have those tags. I kind of want society to start using a word we could then use, like with spooning.

Sorrowless said:
We could use front and side cuddling but I don't think it's a big deal to not have those tags. I kind of want society to start using a word we could then use, like with spooning.

Tonging, because the openings created by their bodies face inwards like a pair of salad tongs.

BlueDingo said:
Tonging, because the openings created by their bodies face inwards like a pair of salad tongs.

Wouldn't work orally as it sounds like tonguing. Pun not intended.

Is there a tag for when a character has a chunk bitten out of their ear?

Dyrone said:
Is there a tag for when a character has a chunk bitten out of their ear?

In general, notched_ear. A bite specifically, I don't think so.

Sorrowless said:
Wouldn't work orally as it sounds like tonguing. Pun not intended.

Tong and tongue should sound different, if pronounced properly.

BlueDingo said:
In general, notched_ear. A bite specifically, I don't think so.

This is exactly what I was looking for, so thank you for the conveniently timed post.

What about when a character grabs their belt or the waist of their pants?

post #163942

Also, I've been tagging hoodie images with sweater and/or jacket, depending on the type. Should we have more specific tags for those garments (eg. hoodie_jacket or perhaps hooded_jacket) or tag both separately (eg. hoodie and jacket)?

BlueDingo said:
What about when a character grabs their belt or the waist of their pants?

post #163942

A generic tag would be pose.

If a character is wearing a piece of topwear but isn't putting their arms in the sleeves, what tag do we use (besides partially_clothed)?

post #333981

TV Tropes calls this Coat Cape.

do we have a tag for a color scheme that is inverted on one half of the body?

post #1162563

Ruku said:
do we have a tag for a color scheme that is inverted on one half of the body?

post #1162563

Contrasting_pattern or contrasting_colours?

post #1218177
For characters who have extra hands, if they're standing upright but using their hands for standing, it's not really a handstand. Do we have a tag for it or should we just stick to my newly made standing_on_hands? I think that may be too easily confused for a handstand though, maybe something else would be better.

BlueDingo said:
If a character is wearing a piece of topwear but isn't putting their arms in the sleeves, what tag do we use (besides partially_clothed)?

post #333981

TV Tropes calls this Coat Cape.

'coat_cape' seems well to me.

Ruku said:
do we have a tag for a color scheme that is inverted on one half of the body?

post #1162563

Try 'chimeric_coloration' (derived from the genetic condition chimerism, e.g.)

Furrin_Gok said:
post #1218177
For characters who have extra hands, if they're standing upright but using their hands for standing, it's not really a handstand. Do we have a tag for it or should we just stick to my newly made standing_on_hands? I think that may be too easily confused for a handstand though, maybe something else would be better.

Can you really call it standing if the hands aren't even attached?

Any instance of a character standing on their hands is a handstand. As long as the body is upright, the orientation of the body at the time is irrelevant. In other words, this wouldn't count.

O16 said:
'coat_cape' seems well to me.

One issue I can see with the name is that coats aren't the only thing this would apply to. Jackets and dress shirts, possibly vests and waistcoats as well.

I wonder if we have enough tags like this to group them? Off the top of my head, we have clothing_around_waist, clothing_around_neck, underwear_on_head and now coat_cape.

BlueDingo said:
Can you really call it standing if the hands aren't even attached?

Yes.

Any instance of a character standing on their hands is a handstand. As long as the body is upright, the orientation of the body at the time is irrelevant. In other words, this wouldn't count.

I rather disagree--To me, a handstand is when a person is upside-down, not right-side-up. The wiki may only state upright, but it's specifically when the head is towards the bottom, not the top.

BlueDingo said:

I wonder if we have enough tags like this to group them? Off the top of my head, we have clothing_around_waist, clothing_around_neck, underwear_on_head and now coat_cape.

Probably not, at least not yet; if appear more two or three tags like that it would be fine.

Oh, and we also have 'penis_hat' (maybe it needs a better name).

O16 said:
Probably not, at least not yet; if appear more two or three tags like that it would be fine.

I remember finding this image a while ago of a character wearing a necktie on her head. No specific tag for this as far as I know.

There's also images of characters wearing clothing the wrong way around.

post #1109912post #252129

O16 said:
Oh, and we also have 'penis_hat' (maybe it needs a better name).

hat_on_penis?

BlueDingo said:

There's also images of characters wearing clothing the wrong way around.

post #1109912post #252129

I guess 'doing_it_wrong' would suffice.

BlueDingo said:

hat_on_penis?

Maybe, I thought about 'hat_over_penis', the difference is subtle, but it passes the idea of covering more clearly.

I am almost sure there is a thread about this somewhere... I will find and read it and then return (it may take a while, I also have some other things to do).

Edit: Then, a lot of time later, I noticed the aforementioned post actually is one of mine (forum #226296)... I feel kind of silly now.

Do we have a tag for a lesbian or gay being made straight and vice versa?

VirgilHusky said:
Do we have a tag for a lesbian or gay being made straight and vice versa?

Context?

VirgilHusky said:
Do we have a tag for a lesbian or gay being made straight and vice versa?

Doubt it. It sounds a bit too dialoguey (is that even a word?) to tag by sight.

BlueDingo said:
Doubt it. It sounds a bit too dialoguey (is that even a word?) to tag by sight.

Not only that, but we don't tag sexual orientations. There is no "gay", "straight", or "lesbian" tags, they're aliased away.

I have a distinct feeling that they're asking about images featuring a change in sexual orientations, hence the above. It may be poor wording, though.

BlueDingo said:
Doubt it. It sounds a bit too dialoguey (is that even a word?) to tag by sight.

I feel like it's something that we should have though, there's many out there that fantasize about "turning" a lesbian or gay straight. Myself included

VirgilHusky said:
I feel like it's something that we should have though, there's many out there that fantasize about "turning" a lesbian or gay straight. Myself included

Make a set for now and we may look into it later.

BlueDingo said:
Make a set for now and we may look into it later.

How do I do that?

VirgilHusky said:
How do I do that?

1. Click "Sets" at the top of the page.
2. Click "New".
3. Enter the relevant data and click the "Create" button.

VirgilHusky said:
Do we have a tag for a lesbian or gay being made straight and vice versa?

Sexual_conversion perhaps?

VirgilHusky said:
Do we have a tag for a lesbian or gay being made straight and vice versa?

How about orientation_play?

JAKXXX3 said:
How about orientation_play?

I like that one. I'm missing a comic page that I like. Let me add that tag.

Is there a tag like belly_riding, but instead of being supported by straps, the penetrated character's body is solely supported by their partners penis? It doesn't have to be horizontally orientated under a quadruped, but also include being supported vertically by a biped. I would think penis_lift would be an appropriate name for it.
post #1220872 post #1220873

I know there is a penis_shaped_bulge, but is there another bulge based tag for vore images where the outlines of a character is clearly seen pushing against the skin? The only thing I could think of would be person_shaped_bulge or something.
post #436264 post #1050673 post #425765

JAKXXX3 said:
I know there is a penis_shaped_bulge, but is there another bulge based tag for vore images where the outlines of a character is clearly seen pushing against the skin? The only thing I could think of would be person_shaped_bulge or something.

Lost_souls lol.

JAKXXX3 said:
I know there is a penis_shaped_bulge, but is there another bulge based tag for vore images where the outlines of a character is clearly seen pushing against the skin? The only thing I could think of would be person_shaped_bulge or something.
post #436264 post #1050673 post #425765

abdominal_bulge.

Siral_Exan said:
abdominal_bulge.

I mean more specific, not just that the character has a bulge in their abdomen, but that they clearly have a person inside them that is pushing against the skin.

JAKXXX3 said:
I mean more specific, not just that the character has a bulge in their abdomen, but that they clearly have a person inside them that is pushing against the skin.

I don't believe such a tag should exist. It's far too specific and you can get similar, if not more, results with abdominal_bulge vore. If all you can list is a character clearly pushing through skin, then you are implying vore and I already listed the tag for bulges coming from something/someone clearly pushing through skin. Fortunately, we don't need to be specific with vore, you can also use bulge vore and minus searching to find cases where, say, where someone leaves an imprint in the vore-er's butt.

Siral_Exan said:
I don't believe such a tag should exist. It's far too specific and you can get similar, if not more, results with abdominal_bulge vore. If all you can list is a character clearly pushing through skin, then you are implying vore and I already listed the tag for bulges coming from something/someone clearly pushing through skin. Fortunately, we don't need to be specific with vore, you can also use bulge vore and minus searching to find cases where, say, where someone leaves an imprint in the vore-er's butt.

Seeing a person getting eaten and then in the next panel seeing a bulging belly is different than seeing a full fledged outline.

Furrin_Gok said:
Seeing a person getting eaten and then in the next panel seeing a bulging belly is different than seeing a full fledged outline.

You mean to imply that seeing a person's imprint through the stomach isn't a bulge? Do we not have tags for when you can see bulges through certain areas?

Siral_Exan said:
You mean to imply that seeing a person's imprint through the stomach isn't a bulge?

You mean to imply seeing a single bump is the same as seeing an entire hand?

Furrin_Gok said:
You mean to imply seeing a single bump is the same as seeing an entire hand?

You're saying it's not, in the fetish it is and has been. https://aryion.com/g4/tags.php?tag=Vore%2C+Bulge%2C+ One of the biggest sites for vore, go find your results there.

I know what I'm talking about when I say abdominal bulge is (one of) what you're looking for.

Siral_Exan said:
You're saying it's not, in the fetish it is and has been. https://aryion.com/g4/tags.php?tag=Vore%2C+Bulge%2C+ One of the biggest sites for vore, go find your results there.

I know what I'm talking about when I say abdominal bulge is (one of) what you're looking for.

Yes, at its base, this is an abdominal bulge, but it goes beyond that.

Furrin_Gok said:
Yes, at its base, this is an abdominal bulge, but it goes beyond that.

You're not gonna find a name that's accurate and intuitive / easy to use. As a voraphiliac, trust me when I say there is no reliable name for this event, mostly because use of it removes context of what kind of vore, and adding such context provides you with a sparse amount of images. People use the not-wrong bulge and specify where the bulge is, so you don't damage the search.

Siral_Exan said:
I don't believe such a tag should exist. It's far too specific and you can get similar, if not more, results with abdominal_bulge vore. If all you can list is a character clearly pushing through skin, then you are implying vore and I already listed the tag for bulges coming from something/someone clearly pushing through skin. Fortunately, we don't need to be specific with vore, you can also use bulge vore and minus searching to find cases where, say, where someone leaves an imprint in the vore-er's butt.

Then why does penis_shaped_bulge exist? It's very specific and could be covered by abdominal_bulge huge_penetration or abdominal_bulge ridiculous_fit. This specific tag led me to believe that there would be other variants of *_shaped_bulge tags.

JAKXXX3 said:
Then why does penis_shaped_bulge exist? It's very specific and could be covered by abdominal_bulge huge_penetration or abdominal_bulge ridiculous_fit. This specific tag led me to believe that there would be other variants of *_shaped_bulge tags.

You're talking about vore, not sex. Even penis_shaped_bulge is clunky and people are misusing it.

There is currently a single post tagged prey_outline.

Kemono-Kay said:
There is currently a single post tagged prey_outline.

I wouldn't exactly say that's intuitive, but it would be easy to use. Tangentially related, the whole predator/prey tag really fucked over the acting of a predator & prey vore scenario (think roleplaying).

Siral_Exan said:
I wouldn't exactly say that's intuitive, but it would be easy to use. Tangentially related, the whole predator/prey tag really fucked over the acting of a predator & prey vore scenario (think roleplaying).

I understand that's a bit of a problem, but I'm not sure how to better word it. It would need to be a relatively short way of referring exclusively to characters being eaten.

Kemono-Kay said:
I understand that's a bit of a problem, but I'm not sure how to better word it. It would need to be a relatively short way of referring exclusively to characters being eaten.

I'm just injecting my personal opinion on prey_outline, I'm not saying no to it. Predator/prey is a personal peeve, a vore artist I follow draws a lot of it. If Furrin and Jak agrees on it, and it gets a wiki page, I'll tag it.

Siral_Exan said:
I'm just injecting my personal opinion on prey_outline, I'm not saying no to it. Predator/prey is a personal peeve, a vore artist I follow draws a lot of it. If Furrin and Jak agrees on it, and it gets a wiki page, I'll tag it.

It could work, though not all posts would be predator/prey based. The below example isn't even really vore, though unbirthing does implicate it.
post #1050673

JAKXXX3 said:
It could work, though not all posts would be predator/prey based. The below example isn't even really vore, though unbirthing does implicate it.
post #1050673

Prey would just be a stand-in word, since there is the contradiction "willing prey". I was willing to make a joke about predatory unbirthing, but I unfortunately couldn't find the image...

Kemono-Kay said:
I understand that's a bit of a problem, but I'm not sure how to better word it. It would need to be a relatively short way of referring exclusively to characters being eaten.

Not just eaten, anal vore and unbirthing count too. Hell, could just be a character is pregnant and has the baby pushing out with such force that their hand or foot actually outlines.

Furrin_Gok said:
Not just eaten, anal vore and unbirthing count too. Hell, could just be a character is pregnant and has the baby pushing out with such force that their hand or foot actually outlines.

Are there even any existing posts of a baby (not unbirthed character) doing that? Also, due to to implications, all kinds of activity whereby a character enters more than one limb into another character would count as vore, 'eating' isn't always involved.

A possible solution would be the creation of a new tag, such as body_outline to replace prey_outline (which has only been used on 1 post anyway). Oh, it looks like body_outline has already been used for the very purpose I was requesting. I'll edit the wiki article to explain it.

JAKXXX3 said:
Are there even any existing posts of a baby (not unbirthed character) doing that? Also, due to to implications, all kinds of activity whereby a character enters more than one limb into another character would count as vore, 'eating' isn't always involved.

A possible solution would be the creation of a new tag, such as body_outline to replace prey_outline (which has only been used on 1 post anyway). Oh, it looks like body_outline has already been used for the very purpose I was requesting. I'll edit the wiki article to explain it.

Well, there we go.

I don't know of anything specific, but I'm sure there are images of pregnancies like that. In that case, I can certainly agree that just having to throw on pregnant or vore to the search is fair.

With that issue solved, is there any answer to my previous question (forum post #232524)? I would think a tag such as penis_lift or penis_carry would already exist, as this is a rather common occurrence in many hyper_penis and ridiculous_fit posts.

I guess body_outline works.

Oh, I've been looking to find a tag meant for jewellery worn on the forehead, like this:
post #2004

It's worn on a sort of chain, so it's not a circlet, and I don't think it can be classified as a headband either. So what's this called and do we have a tag for it?

EDIT: I've looked through a "*penis*" search and nothing has come up about being lifted by a penetrating penis. penis_riding comes closest I guess? But I think a new tag might be appropriate.

JAKXXX3 said:
Are there even any existing posts of a baby (not unbirthed character) doing that? Also, due to to implications, all kinds of activity whereby a character enters more than one limb into another character would count as vore, 'eating' isn't always involved.

A possible solution would be the creation of a new tag, such as body_outline to replace prey_outline (which has only been used on 1 post anyway). Oh, it looks like body_outline has already been used for the very purpose I was requesting. I'll edit the wiki article to explain it.

No. Body outline is fairly literal, and I noticed that you added the tag to images recently. I did provide you cases where penis_shaped_bulge (plural because the example was repeated) is misused, so do you really think other cases where the body is being outlined against a background, or cases where parts of the body is outlined due to, say, clothing, would not be tagged by users other than you?

Prey_outlines implies vore of some sort, it is harder to misuse.

Body_outline sounds like those chalk corpse outlines that detectives sometimes draw in fiction _{^{(and only in fiction, nobody does that in real life)}}. Better pick something else.

Siral_Exan said:
No. Body outline is fairly literal, and I noticed that you added the tag to images recently. I did provide you cases where penis_shaped_bulge is misused, so do you really think other cases where the body is being outlined against a background, or cases where parts of the body is outlined due to, say, clothing, would not be tagged by users other than you?

Prey_outlines implies vore of some sort, it is harder to misuse.

My edits to the wiki entry of body_outline clearly specifies a character being inside of another character, pushing against the skin. There were 50 posts with the tag before I added to it, if you think that prey_outline is a better tag then you can create an alias suggestion.

Prey_outline is not a perfect candidate, as not all vore images are based on a prey/predator dynamic or involve eating/consuming others. Some of them are purely sexual, such as anal_vore, cock_vore, and even extreme fisting whereby the inserted hand may be imprinted on the characters stomach.

Genjar said:
Body_outline sounds like those chalk corpse outlines that detectives sometimes draw in fiction _{^{(and only in fiction, nobody does that in real life)}}. Better pick something else.

There already is a chalk_outline tag, though it has only been used once.

JAKXXX3 said:
My edits to the wiki entry of body_outline clearly specifies a character being inside of another character, pushing against the skin. There were 50 posts with the tag before I added to it, if you think that prey_outline is a better tag then you can create an alias suggestion.

Prey_outline is not a perfect candidate, as not all vore images are based on a prey/predator dynamic or involve eating/consuming others. Some of them are purely sexual, such as anal_vore, cock_vore, and even extreme fisting whereby the inserted hand may be imprinted on the characters stomach.

You have not dealt with any voraphiliac images, have you? References to prey and predators, in any regard, are stand-ins to the involved parties. They aren't meant to be literal unless it's predatorial vore (describing, the name is looser).

Think of it like a contract, or if you've ageplayed think of the difference between the baby and the babysitter; there is no difference in reality, other than the actions they are taking. The words only exist to describe, not to be literal.

Siral_Exan said:
You have not dealt with any voraphiliac images, have you? References to prey and predators, in any regard, are stand-ins to the involved parties. They aren't meant to be literal unless it's predatorial vore (describing, the name is looser).

Think of it like a contract, or if you've ageplayed think of the difference between the baby and the babysitter; there is no difference in reality, other than the actions they are taking. The words only exist to describe, not to be literal.

I'm not very experienced in either of those kinks, no. Isn't it important that tags are simple and easy to understand for new users? Are you assuming that the average user would be knowledgeable of those kinks?

JAKXXX3 said:
I'm not very experienced in either of those kinks, no. Isn't it important that tags are simple and easy to understand for new users? Are you assuming that the average user would be knowledgeable of those kinks?

People should know what stand-in words mean. I mean, if you don't a large amount of American English would be damaged apon translating (or even shorthanding/longhanding), and people have to use English words on this site for a reason.

I mean, do you know why a female can be called a cougar, or what in-bed roleplaying is? You need to assume that people know the basics of English on this site, and some sexual terminology; I might halfheartedly believe everyone is an idiot, but even such "idiots" know how to use a dictionary if they're on this site.

But wittiness aside, being a prey towards a predator can be interpreted literally to understand what the prey_bulge tag means. We wouldn't tag them, themselves, as predator or prey because contexts that remove that, but you can refer to them in English as a predator and a prey... right?