You could use straddle for cowgirl_position (then again, why wouldn't you be?) but all straddle tells you is a character is straddling something. There is a massive difference between "straddling something" and "straddling a person's crotch and facing towards their head while getting fucked by them". What if they are straddling a person's crotch and facing towards their head without getting fucked? There are no "facing forward" or "straddling person" or "on crotch" tags as far as I know.

Also, missionary position doesn't require you to be "on" your partner.

BlueDingo said:
If two characters assume a sexual position but don't have sex, what would you tag that as?

You can't tag the position because they all imply sex, which isn't happening in this case, and would result in a mistag.

imminent_sex

BlueDingo said:
Also, missionary position doesn't require you to be "on" your partner.

Missionary position requires both partners to be lying down, and usually that amounts to one of them lying on top.

...it's been getting mistagged lately, though. Mostly for posts that should be under anvil_position. Looks like someone fucked with the wiki entry over an year ago by removing some relevant bits, and that edit got overlooked. I'll edit those back in.

Do we have a tag for when a character is wearing a belt over her tits?

post #211941

BlueDingo said:
Do we have a tag for when a character is wearing a belt over her tits?

post #211941

there is belt_bra as well as beltbra

there doesnt seem to be an actual name for it, a google search only brings up normal bras that are additionally supported by multiple small belts, nothing like the example thru the style in the example has been worn by celebrities on multiple occasions irl

Ruku said:
there is belt_bra as well as beltbra

there doesnt seem to be an actual name for it, a google search only brings up normal bras that are additionally supported by multiple small belts, nothing like the example thru the style in the example has been worn by celebrities on multiple occasions irl

belt_bra sounds good enough for now. Might be an issue if a male character does it, though.

Wiki page created.

BlueDingo said:
belt_bra sounds good enough for now. Might be an issue if a male character does it, though.

Wiki page created.

would chest_belt be more suited?

considering that we are kinda talking about improvised clothing, not a actual bra...

Ruku said:
would chest_belt be more suited?

That would be a better choice. Gender-neutral, more accurate.

Is there anything more specific than breast_squeeze for images where both the arms are down, hands together, squishing the breasts together?

post #1177459 post #999816

It might be a Japanese pose. It might also be used for the breasts equivalent of wakamezake.

Do we have a tag for scales that look rough? I'm mostly thinking of cases where the image is detailed, catching all the small scales.

Sorrowless said:
Do we have a tag for scales that look rough? I'm mostly thinking of cases where the image is detailed, catching all the small scales.

It's not a perfect solution, but try scales ~detailed ~photorealism ~realistic or scalie ~detailed ~photorealism ~realistic.

Do we have a tag for:

• A temporary building made from unconventional materials like books, pillows, boxes, etc.?
• Objects in general draped or wrapped around a character's neck?

post #954552post #213844

Sorrowless said:
Do we have a tag for scales that look rough? I'm mostly thinking of cases where the image is detailed, catching all the small scales.

detailed_scales is probly the best you get, not all posts in there i would actually call rough but all posts in there do seem to have actual scale texture.

Lance_Armstrong said:
Is there anything more specific than breast_squeeze for images where both the arms are down, hands together, squishing the breasts together?

post #1177459 post #999816

It might be a Japanese pose. It might also be used for the breasts equivalent of wakamezake.

Doesnt seem to be, thru the pose does seem to be a common in anime often from shy and aluring characters. probly a new tag presenting_cleavage is in order here.

Ruku said:
detailed_scales is probly the best you get, not all posts in there i would actually call rough but all posts in there do seem to have actual scale texture.

That's a good tag. It doesn't have to be rough, I just like it when the scales are, well, detailed. Most pics skip that part.

Do we have tags that differentiate between characters washing/bathing themselves and washing/bathing others?

post #1148531 <- self / other -> post #1114729

hmm... was going use calves for calf muscles but then noticed it was invalidated a year ago without any discussion at all >_>

Do we have any alternatives for these? post #1106715

BlueDingo said:
Do we have tags that differentiate between characters washing/bathing themselves and washing/bathing others?

post #1148531 <- self / other -> post #1114729

I approve of a differentiating tag.
post #911428

Ruku said:
hmm... was going use calves for calf muscles but then noticed it was invalidated a year ago without any discussion at all >_>

Do we have any alternatives for these? post #1106715

The calf muscle is also called a gastrocnemius. No images are tagged that, though.

Diagram

BlueDingo said:
The calf muscle is also called a gastrocnemius. No images are tagged that, though.

Diagram

ya thru it was to be in such a way as is done with tags such as abs or pecs to mean the collective group not just the individual muscle of which gastrocnemius is one of 2 plus a tendon.>_>; also the lack of familiarity to the name gastrocnemius.

What about a tag for chipped teeth?

HypnoBitch said:
What about a tag for chipped teeth?

We have 'broken_tooth' (current post counting = 1).

O16 said:
We have 'broken_tooth' (current post counting = 1).

That would be because it's broken_teeth... singular vs plural, but that is also sorta inaccurate. Chipped teeth aren't broken, they're just damaged. So, maybe making a chipped_teeth or damaged_teeth (because chips aren't the only way to damage teeth).

Siral_Exan said:
That would be because it's broken_teeth... singular vs plural, but that is also sorta inaccurate. Chipped teeth aren't broken, they're just damaged. So, maybe making a chipped_teeth or damaged_teeth (because chips aren't the only way to damage teeth).

Oh. I guess that should have searched for the plural instead.

Maybe 'damaged' be a bit too ample, I mean, a severely carious tooth is damaged as well, isn't it? Also, 'broken' and 'chipped' only differ on the extension of the damage,' hence broken_teeth' isn't that inaccurate.

O16 said:
Also, 'broken' and 'chipped' only differ on the extension of the damage,' hence broken_teeth' isn't that inaccurate.

I can vouch for that. Personal experience with a tooth splitting down the middle.

What is this skirt-like garment called:

post #225201

BlueDingo said:
What is this skirt-like garment called:

post #225201

customly designed thru seems to be adapted from Pteruges

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pteruges

post #1117502 post #1185691

We have the tag interlocked_fingers for when the fingers are between eachother, but what about this specific position, when they're interlocked (or otherwise, could probably apply to the heart stuff too) over the chest?

Furrin_Gok said:
post #1117502 post #1185691

We have the tag interlocked_fingers for when the fingers are between eachother, but what about this specific position, when they're interlocked (or otherwise, could probably apply to the heart stuff too) over the chest?

I guess 'interlocked fingers' works well in these cases too.

O16 said:
I guess 'interlocked fingers' works well in these cases too.

Not really. Marissa's fingers aren't visible, so it doesn't really seem fair to keep the tag on, I only added it in leau of anything better.

post #1187591
So, uh. Fisting, but with feet. There a tag for that?

Furrin_Gok said:
post #1187591
So, uh. Fisting, but with feet. There a tag for that?

Feeting would be a good name for it.

What would the granular solid (sand, dirt, salt, gravel, etc.) equivalent of a splash be called?

I've never seen a shirt that covers the wearer's palms before. Name?

post #642320post #787142

Do we have a tag for when a drawing is drawn with no fine details, as if the colors were applied very roughly?

post #1081595post #154455

BlueDingo said:
Do we have a tag for when a drawing is drawn with no fine details, as if the colors were applied very roughly?

post #1081595post #154455

Speedpainting
Impasto
Impresionism(style, thru backgrounds often tend to be the focus in this art group rather then specific characters/people so maybe not applicable here)

BlueDingo said:
What would the granular solid (sand, dirt, salt, gravel, etc.) equivalent of a splash be called?

I've never seen a shirt that covers the wearer's palms before. Name?

post #642320post #787142

Most likly the same thing, term focuses on the action, not the material that action is orchestrated by.
Deserts that cover whole planets are often called oceans or seas in fiction.

Seems to just be a regular extra long sleeve shirt with thumbholes cut in the sides http://store.nike.com/us/en_us/pd/dry-element-womens-long-sleeve-running-top/pid-10293934/pgid-11919471
Other styles with long sleeves could also have those...

Ruku said:
Speedpainting
Impasto
Impresionism(style, thru backgrounds often tend to be the focus in this art group rather then specific characters/people so maybe not applicable here)

Speedpainting looks like the best fit. Impasto looks like something that can only be applied to paint.

Ruku said:
Most likely the same thing, term focuses on the action, not the material that action is orchestrated by.
Deserts that cover whole planets are often called oceans or seas in fiction.

True, but every dictionary I've ever seen specifies liquid in the definition so I didn't know if solids that behave like liquids would count.

Ruku said:
Seems to just be a regular extra long sleeve shirt with thumbholes cut in the sides http://store.nike.com/us/en_us/pd/dry-element-womens-long-sleeve-running-top/pid-10293934/pgid-11919471
Other styles with long sleeves could also have those...

So what should we tag it? "Thumbholes" might work.

Non-human or feral-esque ("baggy") hips? Like in the top right of post #1193290 or post #1132937 or post #687374

BlueDingo said:
So what should we tag it? "Thumbholes" might work.

i believe it may be mistaged with fingerless_gloves thru.

thumbsleeved_shirt was something i was thinking but it sounds rather stupid>_>
but it does seem to be in actual use considering this quick search,
https://www.google.com/#q=thumb+sleeve+shirts

cfgv said:
Non-human or feral-esque ("baggy") hips? Like in the top right of post #1193290 or post #1132937 or post #687374

we do have short_legs that seems to fullfill the role if rather undertagged thru haunches is more apt for the specific shape of the legs seen in the last 2 examples and top right corner of the first example but that tag is improperly aliased to crouching

Ruku said:
we do have short_legs that seems to fullfill the role if rather undertagged thru haunches is more apt for the specific shape of the legs seen in the last 2 examples and top right corner of the first example but that tag is improperly aliased to crouching

Not too sure about haunches, those are thigh and buttock considered as one, while the defining characteristic of what I'm looking for is the skin not attaching to the inner knee.

Ruku said:
i believe it may be mistaged with fingerless_gloves thru.

I believe the word you want is "though." Thru is short for through, as in, to drive through a tunnel. If you want to shorten "though," try "tho".

Furrin_Gok said:
I believe the word you want is "though." Thru is short for through, as in, to drive through a tunnel. If you want to shorten "though," try "tho".

sorry just a habit, and its "thou", not "tho" ^_^;

cfgv said:
Not too sure about haunches, those are thigh and buttock considered as one, while the defining characteristic of what I'm looking for is the skin not attaching to the inner knee.

not so much attaching but rather simply not defined in the particular drawing style(saving on the number of strokes needed by defining the back side of the leg from butt to foot with a single continuous line rather then multiple lines following proper contours), and yes as you described that is the common definition of haunches and for what you are speaking of generally you can only tell thighs and feet apart, as such it can apply here. note that the visual illusion of this in feral animals irl are also called haunches.

Ruku said:
sorry just a habit, and its "thou", not "tho" ^_^;

But thou is archaic for "you". Tho shows up as shortened though in the dictionary. The pronunciation of those two words, being different, should be what tips you off: tho and though sound the same.

Ruku said:
sorry just a habit, and its "thou", not "tho" ^_^;

not so much attaching but rather simply not defined in the particular drawing style(saving on the number of strokes needed by defining the back side of the leg from butt to foot with a single continuous line rather then multiple lines following proper contours), and yes as you described that is the common definition of haunches and for what you are speaking of generally you can only tell thighs and feet apart, as such it can apply here. note that the visual illusion of this in feral animals irl are also called haunches.

Haunches rolls off the tongue better than baggy legs so I'll see if I can get that alias removed.

Is there a tag for where genitalia is visible, but obscured enough that the type (humanoid, canine, equine, etc) can't be determined? Like...
post #25008
Pussy and penis are visible, but you really can't tell what you're looking at as far as type of genitals go.

regsmutt said:
Is there a tag for where genitalia is visible, but obscured enough that the type (humanoid, canine, equine, etc) can't be determined? Like...
post #25008
Pussy and penis are visible, but you really can't tell what you're looking at as far as type of genitals go.

regsmutt said:
Is there a tag for where genitalia is visible, but obscured enough that the type (humanoid, canine, equine, etc) can't be determined? Like...
post #25008
Pussy and penis are visible, but you really can't tell what you're looking at as far as type of genitals go.

barely_visible_genitalia

cfgv said:
barely_visible_genitalia

Close except for this line from the wiki: "Note that genitals don't count as subtle if a character is interacting with them."

regsmutt said:
Close except for this line from the wiki: "Note that genitals don't count as subtle if a character is interacting with them."

Recently added, and now removed. That was not the original purpose or usage of the tag, so adding something like would need to be at least discussed first. Not to mention that the implicated subtags have no such limitation.

Is there a tag for the "wavy mouth" ('~') expression?

SnowBooties said:
Is there a tag for the "wavy mouth" ('~') expression?

:s Note that for expressions we try to use colons and semicolons.

Shoes with the toe section curved upward?

post #1026742

Do we have a tag for this kind of "front half hanging off the furniture" position?

post #228612 post #641785

BlueDingo said:
Shoes with the toe section curved upward?

post #1026742

They are called poulaines and there are two types of them, the ones with curved tip (example ) and the ones with straight tip (example ). Apparently we haven't a tag for them at the moment.

Strangely enough, they have (or at least had) a sexual meaning since the tip length is intended to represent man's virility.

Is there a tag for when the penis or pussy on a taur creature is at the pelvis of the top portion? Moreso, is there a tag for when it's got one at both pelvises that's more specific than just 2_pussies (which is mysteriously not tagged?)?

post #1203737 post #1196649

Tags which are more specific than genital_piercing seem to be a thing:
https://e621.net/tag?name=*piercing*&type=&order=count
However, I cannot find anything with dolphin_piercing. Here is an example:
post #1204881
Is this a tag which should be added in the future? Even if there are no other posts with that tag, there may be in the future. (Gotta start somewhere.) There might even be mis-tagged posts, like this one (not sure though):
post #1186911
Or posts where this was overlooked.

Calimero000 said:
However, I cannot find anything with dolphin_piercing. Here is an example:
post #1204881
Is this a tag which should be added in the future? Even if there are no other posts with that tag, there may be in the future. (Gotta start somewhere.)

Hmmm...I agree that it doesn't really fit with either prince_albert_piercing or glans_piercing...considering both those seem to loop through the pee-hole and this does not. Perhaps a new tag is needed. You could probably find additional images to tag by just looking through the prince_albert_piercing and glans_piercing tags. I'm sure some piercings that are actually dolphin piercings have been swept in with those.

Calimero000 said:
There might even be mis-tagged posts, like this one (not sure though):
post #1186911
Or posts where this was overlooked.

That post already has a prince_albert_piercing tag to describe the piercing. I don't think it's mistagged.

Dyrone said:
Perhaps a new tag is needed.

I agree.

Dyrone said:
I don't think it's mistagged.

This one has a weird perspective to it. It might even be that this particular piercing is going sideways through the glans because there is something behind the penis, which could be the other end of the piercing.
To me it looks like the meatus is further up and to the right so that's why I considered it.

Do we have a tag for when a character has each hand in the other arm's sleeve?

post #119951post #119948

A tag for images where it would be impossible to tell what species the character is without being told. This wouldn't apply to cases where it's due to the species itself being lesser known, but because almost all identifying marks of the species are missing.

post #1200661 post #1172814 post #661533 post #1205642 post #1146793

regsmutt said:
A tag for images where it would be impossible to tell what species the character is without being told. This wouldn't apply to cases where it's due to the species itself being lesser known, but because almost all identifying marks of the species are missing.

unknown_species

BlueDingo said:
unknown_species

Doesn't quite fit. The intended species of my examples is known and tagged. If it wasn't tagged however, it'd be hard to say what they're supposed to be. A solution might be to expand ambiguous_species to include instances where the character's species isn't discernible without outside knowledge, regardless of if it's known or not. It seems to be used this way occasionally, but I haven't seen an example where a character is tagged both with a specific species and amiguous_species.

How should we handle characters holding severed body parts? holding_object? holding_(bodypart)? (bodypart)_grab?

post #122787

Do we have an exposed_thigh or equivalent tag? I mean for images where someone is clothed, but the leg/thigh is exposed and prominent.
post #1208953

JAKXXX3 said:
Do we have an exposed_thigh or equivalent tag? I mean for images where someone is clothed, but the leg/thigh is exposed and prominent.
post #1208953

Nothing more specific than seductive pose, as far as I know. And that finds a wide variety of content.

post #1209104
We have the long_skirt tag for long skirts like Susie's, and we have miniskirt for really tiny ones, but what about a modest, knee length one like Isabelle has here?

BlueDingo said:
How should we handle characters holding severed body parts? holding_object? holding_(bodypart)? (bodypart)_grab?

post #122787

Probably 'holding_object' + 'severed_[body-part]' suffice.

JAKXXX3 said:
Do we have an exposed_thigh or equivalent tag? I mean for images where someone is clothed, but the leg/thigh is exposed and prominent.
post #1208953

That's feature in a skirt or dress is apparently called a 'split' and 'slit' is also commonly used. Maybe a tag like split_skirt or skirt_slit could work. It wouldn't apply to other instances where the thighs are exposed like in shorts or knee socks though.

Is there a tag for when a character has a noticeable amount of snow on them?

post #48482

BlueDingo said:
Is there a tag for when a character has a noticeable amount of snow on them?

post #48482

Apparently no and I guess we don't need one either, it would be unnecessarily specific; maybe a tag usable to any granular substance/compound would be more adequate.

O16 said:
Apparently no and I guess we don't need one either, it would be unnecessarily specific; maybe a tag usable to any granular substance/compound would be more adequate.

Maybe. But then again, we have specific tags for cum, pussy juice and blood.

What would we call it? "granular_substance_on_*" is a bit long, plus snow isn't exactly granular. Messy wouldn't really apply since we're not talking about liquids... Dirty, maybe, but who calls someone covered in snow dirty?

BlueDingo said:
Maybe. But then again, we have specific tags for cum, pussy juice and blood.

I am not saying specificity is bad, the refered mixtures are more than enough common to warrant their own tags, in such way those aren't "unnecessarily specific".

BlueDingo said:
What would we call it? "granular_substance_on_*" is a bit long, plus snow isn't exactly granular. Messy wouldn't really apply since we're not talking about liquids... Dirty, maybe, but who calls someone covered in snow dirty?

I don't know; exists a word for that in portuguese: 'polvilhado'¹ (covered with a not so dense layer of some granular substance/compound, e.g. ), but don't know a translation to english that keeps its full meaning. Also non-compacted snow may be considered granular since 'grain' haven't a specific size; even coarse gravel is considered granular.

post #1211561
With the existence of 4_eyes+, each pair can be half closed in different directions. Is there a tag for each half-closed direction, or for doing both at once?

O16 said:
I am not saying specificity is bad, the refered mixtures are more than enough common to warrant their own tags, in such way those aren't "unnecessarily specific".

I don't know; exists a word for that in portuguese: 'polvilhado'¹ (covered with a not so dense layer of some granular substance/compound, e.g. ), but don't know a translation to english that keeps its full meaning. Also non-compacted snow may be considered granular since 'grain' haven't a specific size; even coarse gravel is considered granular.

dusted_shoulders ?

https://www.google.com/#q=dusted look at section 2
https://www.google.com/search?q=dusted+shoulders&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiIouyr_-DTAhVnwlQKHZ0XAFsQ_AUIBigB&biw=1280&bih=637#imgrc=eA9ikcsSTXqd9M:

could apply the same for other body parts like tail of head...

JAKXXX3 said:
Do we have an exposed_thigh or equivalent tag? I mean for images where someone is clothed, but the leg/thigh is exposed and prominent.
post #1208953

The style of skirt she's wearing is called a side_slit. Also, great pic, I love Lord Dominator.

Furrin_Gok said:
post #1209104
We have the long_skirt tag for long skirts like Susie's, and we have miniskirt for really tiny ones, but what about a modest, knee length one like Isabelle has here?

"Knee-length skirt" and "midi skirt" seem to be the going terms. Neither one are tags, though.

-------------

I often see images where a character holds an object (usually a weapon) over their shoulder in this fashion. Does this pose have a name?

post #1059864post #1175951post #1161497