Do we have a tag for "feral body type but not what the feral animal in question has"?

Cetaceans get this a lot. For example: https://e621.net/posts/5259020

Like. Yeah, that's certainly a quadruped and not an anthro. Modern cetaceans aren't quadrupeds, though. It seems to me like there should be some kind of equivalent tag to anthrofication for this situation?

(Tetrapodification?? Yes, I know cetaceans are tetrapods by descent, same as snakes, but it's the closest -ification I can think of that isn't, say, land-animal-ification or something.)

Most take_your_pick posts are for presenting to the viewer. How should multiple characters presenting to a single character be tagged? Is the take_your_pick tag still correct and sufficient tagging?

post #961061 post #5254156 post #1310318

Do we have a tag for purposefully low framerate videos?
I'm not talking about videos that just have poor framerate, but ones that are "stylistically" stop-motion like, reminiscent of Spiderverse's animation style.

For example, literally any video featuring Bass_boosted_soldier. Though there are other vids I notice that are doing it, hence why I wanted to check for the tag since I can't use him to narrow it down anymore.

crocogator said:
Most take_your_pick posts are for presenting to the viewer. How should multiple characters presenting to a single character be tagged? Is the take_your_pick tag still correct and sufficient tagging?

I'd say yes. It seems the wiki was changed to include other characters and not just the viewer a couple months ago by Sins and Virtues, but I'd agree with the change. The distinction between another character and the viewer can be unclear at times, and taggers do get confused between a character's POV (first_person_view) and a non-character view, so I don't think separate tags for a character vs the viewer would be a good idea.

ethikal said:
Do we have a tag for purposefully low framerate videos?
I'm not talking about videos that just have poor framerate, but ones that are "stylistically" stop-motion like, reminiscent of Spiderverse's animation style.

I imagine most low framerate videos are purposely low framerate. If a video is meant to have a high framerate, but has a low framerate because of performance problems with the rendering or video encoding, it'd be treated as low quality. Similar to excessive compression artifacts, which can be a mark against the post's quality but if done purposefully can be acceptable when it adds to the scene rather than takes away from it.

We have many tags for depicting characters in specific alternate forms and alternate species: furrification, feralized, dragonified, ponification, taurification/taurified (the latter has both currently in use; I see there's discussion of the preferred suffixes in topic #39296).

But I realised that there's a big one missing: we don't seem to have a tag for depicting normally organic characters as robots. (Or as related things like animatronics and animate inanimates.)

We do have the robotization tag, but that's for cases where the living character has transformed into a robot. Unlike furrification, feralized, and the other tags listed above, which can be used on images where there's no transformation or other justification for them being that way.

I noticed this gap in available tags when I went to tag this image:

post #3958046

For now, in the absence of any tag specifically to describe this robot version, I suppose that the more general alternate form and alternate species will have to do. (Assuming that a robot rabbit counts as a different species from a normal rabbit...?)

chemistrynoisy said:
We have many tags for depicting characters in specific alternate forms and alternate species: furrification, feralized, dragonified, ponification, taurification/taurified (the latter has both currently in use; I see there's discussion of the preferred suffixes in topic #39296).

But I realised that there's a big one missing: we don't seem to have a tag for depicting normally organic characters as robots. (Or as related things like animatronics and animate inanimates.)

We do have the robotization tag, but that's for cases where the living character has transformed into a robot. Unlike furrification, feralized, and the other tags listed above, which can be used on images where there's no transformation or other justification for them being that way.

I noticed this gap in available tags when I went to tag this image:

post #3958046

For now, in the absence of any tag specifically to describe this robot version, I suppose that the more general alternate form and alternate species will have to do. (Assuming that a robot rabbit counts as a different species from a normal rabbit...?)

alternate_form is kind of a mess, it's not totally clear it's meant for the common definition of "form" meaning just meaning shape/structure or the site's definition of "form" being the set that includes anthro, feral, taur, human, humanoid. and alternate species seems wrong since the character hasn't really changed species but is just no not an animal, or alive, in the strictest sense.

maybe alternate_biology or something? since they're diffrent from their original basis of life (in the given example carbon-based to silicon-based).

dba_afish said:
alternate_form is kind of a mess, it's not totally clear it's meant for the common definition of "form" meaning just meaning shape/structure or the site's definition of "form" being the set that includes anthro, feral, taur, human, humanoid.

Yeah, alternate form is awkward because it's currently used for a broad range of different purposes:

• As you say, this site has a pretty specific definition of "form" to mean the body plans you listed, so one might assume that the tag should only refer to those.
• But then, we also have subtler changes in body type that aren't quite a full change in "form", such as an anthro character being drawn in a way that earns the additional semi-anthro tag, or a character being drawn with more human characteristics and so qualifying as anthrofied. At the moment, it seems like changes like those are enough to justify the alternate_form tag.
• Also, the alternate form tag's wiki page advises that it's also used to tag "drastically different" changes in art style. This is getting further away from the "body plan" definition of "form", and towards the very subjective idea of art style: how far away from on model does an image have to be before the alternate form tag can be used? (I often find myself wrestling with this when it comes to other art style tags that are similarly subjective, like toony.)
• The top of the wiki page even says that a change from digital artwork to traditional media is enough to earn the alternate form tag!

Using one tag to cover such a wide range of things has really never sat well with me.

I've seen that there is a separate different artstyle tag in use (with a minimal wiki page), but it's only used by 60 images so it clearly hasn't been widely adopted, even if it hasn't been actively discouraged.

Would there be a specific tag for "wagging penis" or something that would be eligible to work with a wagging penis? I was looking at prehensile_penis, but that specifies the ability to grasp with the penis, whereas in this case it would be a penis more aligned with a tail (while still being located with the standard penis would be located) wagging. Obviously, though, tail_penis also wouldn't work, as again, it's not a penis on the tip of a tail. The closest I can maybe see is shaking_penis, but at the same time the wiki also specifies "a character "wagging" their penis in a slight side-to-side motion by moving their hips, similar to the wagging motion of a tail.", whereas in this case the penis would be wagging independent from any "external" force like hip movement.

Anyone have any thoughts?

So apparently implied_vore is just an invalid tag. So what would be the appropriate tag in post #5087122 ?

dinbyy said:
So apparently implied_vore is just an invalid tag. So what would be the appropriate tag in post #5087122 ?

since text isn't counted and the dialogue is slightly ambiguous anyways, I'd say that it shouldn't have a vore tag at all, nothing in the image screams vore

pool #30860 depicts content featuring dehumanization and cultural genocide, which I think is way beyond what most people searching for speciesism and/or humiliation (what the content is currently tagged with) are bargaining for. As an extreme fetish, I think this warrants a tag for blacklisting purposes. Do we have tags that are applicable for such content? genocide is currently only tagged for 13 posts, and most of them are humorous in nature.

If not, I would propose a "depersonalization" tag as a furry-inclusive variant of "dehumanization". (This could also have application for sapient-to-nonsapient transformation content.)

post #5289299 has the character's womb extracted through her vagina, and the ovaries taken.Try as I might, I cannot find any tags related to this.I would really like to know how to tag this so I can add the tag to the post, and then my blacklist. (Yes, I'm the one who uploaded it.)((Also, how do you tag robotic tentacles?))

prolapse, vaginal_prolapse, and ovary_theft (ovary_theft is a 2-post tag now)

I found the old cum thread(s?) from back in the day, but I would like to suggest a reinstatement/revision of thick_cum as viscous_cum, for cum that obviously has properties that take it beyond merely being sticky. If it has non-Neutonian properties, like pancake batter or oobleck, I think that deserves a tag. It's certainly a common enough trope to have relevance, & I disagree with its aliasing to just "cum". I, personally, much prefer it when cum is depicted as being obviously thick & batter-like but not "solid", as the blacklist-focused tag describes.

beholding said:
pool #30860 depicts content featuring dehumanization and cultural genocide, which I think is way beyond what most people searching for speciesism and/or humiliation (what the content is currently tagged with) are bargaining for. As an extreme fetish, I think this warrants a tag for blacklisting purposes. Do we have tags that are applicable for such content? genocide is currently only tagged for 13 posts, and most of them are humorous in nature.

If not, I would propose a "depersonalization" tag as a furry-inclusive variant of "dehumanization". (This could also have application for sapient-to-nonsapient transformation content.)

Just use the cruelty and/or suffering tags.

Is there any tag for blocky characters? Like minecraft or roblox models.

dinbyy said:
Is there any tag for blocky characters? Like minecraft or roblox models.

voxel_(artwork)

Which seems to need more love. Here's an article on it: https://blog.displate.com/voxel-art/

I think it should probably imply low_poly, too, come to think.

mxferal said:
voxel_(artwork)

Which seems to need more love. Here's an article on it: https://blog.displate.com/voxel-art/

I think it should probably imply low_poly, too, come to think.

I disagree. Minecraft's artstyle is not voxel art, despite what it may look like, and Roblox avatars very obviously aren't. OP is probably not looking for this tag.
Voxel art is absolutely NOT low poly, neither stylistically nor technically. Assuming it is even rendered with polygons, it would have too many.

dinbyy said:
Is there any tag for blocky characters? Like minecraft or roblox models.

blocky_body seems to be the one, but it's undertagged. robloxian if you want to blacklist, but they're not necessarily blocky.

iseekstowin said:
I disagree. Minecraft's artstyle is not voxel art, despite what it may look like, and Roblox avatars very obviously aren't. OP is probably not looking for this tag.
Voxel art is absolutely NOT low poly, neither stylistically nor technically. Assuming it is even rendered with polygons, it would have too many.

blocky_body seems to be the one, but it's undertagged. robloxian if you want to blacklist, but they're not necessarily blocky.

mxferal said:
voxel_(artwork)

Which seems to need more love. Here's an article on it: https://blog.displate.com/voxel-art/

I think it should probably imply low_poly, too, come to think.

voxel_(artwork) should be reserved for actual voxel work, not drawings of character's in a blocky/voxel style

iseekstowin said:
I disagree. Minecraft's artstyle is not voxel art, despite what it may look like, and Roblox avatars very obviously aren't. OP is probably not looking for this tag.
Voxel art is absolutely NOT low poly, neither stylistically nor technically. Assuming it is even rendered with polygons, it would have too many.

blocky_body seems to be the one, but it's undertagged. robloxian if you want to blacklist, but they're not necessarily blocky.

A bit unfortunate it's undertagged but I'll keep an eye out for posts that should have the tag in the future.

Although the a lot of the posts already tagged can only be loosely described as blocky, so I guess I'll leave it alone for now.

Curious why melanistic_[species] tags were invalidated. Granted, it's still not too difficult to combine melanistic with leopard and jaguar, but if you want to find a melanistic_cougar, lion, or tiger (yes I'm aware there's dispute that these exist iRL or not) and a regular leopard, then you're gonna have to sort through a lot of chaff. Or specifically want the jaguar to be the panther with a leopard in the pic. Or even non-felids, like a melanistic_squirrel

While cleaning up the virgin tag, I encountered post #4983217, which made me wonder if we have a tag for... I don't know what to call it exactly, equating virginity loss with coming-of-age?

beholding said:
While cleaning up the virgin tag, I encountered post #4983217, which made me wonder if we have a tag for... I don't know what to call it exactly, equating virginity loss with coming-of-age?

i mean it's still virginity if they're a dude. i don't think we need another tag just for coming of age, especially since may religions and cultures have different things that classify coming of age.

manitka said:
i mean it's still virginity if they're a dude. i don't think we need another tag just for coming of age, especially since may religions and cultures have different things that classify coming of age.

I specifically mean that phrase of "[losing your virginity means] becoming a man/woman", not just any description of coming-of-age.

beholding said:
I specifically mean that phrase of "[losing your virginity means] becoming a man/woman", not just any description of coming-of-age.

i would say no, because text doesn't count towards tag what you see.

manitka said:
i would say no, because text doesn't count towards tag what you see.

for some stuff it does. we have tags that specifically refer to the contents of dialogue, like impregnation_request and the stated_* tags, and a few that could be tagged based on context both textual and visual, like rape.

dba_afish said:
for some stuff it does. we have tags that specifically refer to the contents of dialogue, like impregnation_request and the stated_* tags, and a few that could be tagged based on context both textual and visual, like rape.

true true, but i don't think "I'm gonna make you into a man by fucking you" is something that fits in with those, but we could try it, i just don't see it being a useful tag persoanlly

It would have to be a lore tag, and probably something like v-card_theft or make_a_man_out_of_you

manitka said:
since text isn't counted and the dialogue is slightly ambiguous anyways, I'd say that it shouldn't have a vore tag at all, nothing in the image screams vore

I find vore and imminent_vore are fairly often over-tagged for any large size difference images involving the mouth or even other body parts. Not that I go on a crusade to change it unless I feel very strongly that it's mis-tagged.

kevsnowcat said:
It would have to be a lore tag, and probably something like v-card_theft or make_a_man_out_of_you

It wouldn't need to be a lore tag, since it would be tagged based on dialogue in the post itself.

I found another post that possibly counts, though it's in a different context: post #2855992 If I find a third I'll make a tag for it, since it is a kink so someone might have a use for it. The issue is I can't think of a good name for it. "becoming a man" or "make a man out of you" is the clearest and most literal description, but it's exclusionary of other genders. "sex as coming-of-age" is the best I can think of, but it's awkward and a mouthful.

beholding said:
It wouldn't need to be a lore tag, since it would be tagged based on dialogue in the post itself.

I think dialogue for abstract concepts is always lore, no matter how direct and unambiguous is. Like incest is always lore even if you draw a birth certificate on the wall proving they're related.

beholding said:
It wouldn't need to be a lore tag, since it would be tagged based on dialogue in the post itself.

I found another post that possibly counts, though it's in a different context: post #2855992 If I find a third I'll make a tag for it, since it is a kink so someone might have a use for it. The issue is I can't think of a good name for it. "becoming a man" or "make a man out of you" is the clearest and most literal description, but it's exclusionary of other genders. "sex as coming-of-age" is the best I can think of, but it's awkward and a mouthful.

That post has nothing to do with sex as coming of age? There’s no context for it outside of the rest of the comic, which doesn’t get taken into account. He could simply have gone through any of the other many qualifiers of “manhood” by societal standards. Bar mitzvah, first hunting kill, fighting in a war, etc.

I’d suggest making a thread for this as we are now clogging up this thread.

kevsnowcat said:
I think dialogue for abstract concepts is always lore, no matter how direct and unambiguous is. Like incest is always lore even if you draw a birth certificate on the wall proving they're related.

Actually, we do have a general tag for that: stated incest

Do we have a tag for the trope of temporarily shifting the art style to toony for comedic purposes? Examples:

post #949053 post #4739325

Is there a tag for pokephilia scenarios where it's specifically the pokemon doing the penetrating? Somehow it's just hotter when, say, the Cinderace is doing the pentrating compared to some generic human or fursona I don't recognize.

georgie_leech said:
Is there a tag for pokephilia scenarios where it's specifically the pokemon doing the penetrating? Somehow it's just hotter when, say, the Cinderace is doing the pentrating compared to some generic human or fursona I don't recognize.

have at it
pokephilia ~feral_penetrating ~anthro_penetrating

Do we have a tag for halo imagery, i.e. when natural light frames a character's head as if it is an aureola? Example:

post #1387911

Do we have a tag for a later iteration of a character wearing an earlier/older costume or outfit? Example:

post #5299783

Do we have a tag for the active motion of spreading a pussy (and perhaps also specifically the moment the Labia minora come apart)? Spread_pussy, while being the result of said action, makes for a very broad search. Even when appending the animated tag. I'm looking for something that's similar to what retracting_foreskin is to retracted foreskin. (Spreading_pussy is, understandably due to its common use, aliased to its static version)

Also, do we have a tag for the audible sound version of shlick aforementioned action tends to make?

darcan said:

Also, do we have a tag for the audible sound version of shlick aforementioned action tends to make?

We do not have audio sound effects tags, they're only for text.

Do we have a tag for when the two tops of a spitroast are kissing each other?
Is tag kissing_while_penetrating sufficient?

examples:
post #3295891 post #4328058 post #5206769

Thanks.

Do we have a tag for altering the color of a scene to convey an emotional state? Example:

post #4757489

Most of this comic is fully colored, but this scene is mostly monochrome except for the protagonist's partner radiating an area of full color (conveying that the protagonist is in a depressive state but their partner is pulling them out of it). I assume spot color is not the correct tag for this.

Is there a tag for this gesture? 👉🏽👈🏽

listerthesquirrel said:
Do we have a tag for when the two tops of a spitroast are kissing each other?
Is tag kissing_while_penetrating sufficient?

examples:
post #3295891 post #4328058 post #5206769

Thanks.

kissing_while_penetrating spitroast
triangle position

mrwhat1 said:
Is there a tag for this gesture? 👉🏽👈🏽

index_to_index