Topic: Stirrup BUR

The bulk update request #8691 is pending approval.

create implication stirrup_(marking) (493) -> foot_markings (454)
create implication stirrup_clothing (123) -> clothing (2468624)
create implication stirrup_footwear (1000) -> footwear (320985)
create implication stirrup_boots (11) -> stirrup_footwear (1000)
create implication stirrup_boots (11) -> boots (93148)
create implication stirrup_socks (3039) -> stirrup_footwear (1000)
create implication stirrup_socks (3039) -> socks (76910) # duplicate of implication #5013
create implication stirrup_legwear (3991) -> legwear (362693)
create implication stirrup_knee_boots (15) -> stirrup_boots (11)
create implication stirrup_knee_boots (15) -> knee_boots (2510)
create implication stirrup_leggings (124) -> stirrup_legwear (3991)
create implication stirrup_leggings (124) -> leggings (19760)
create implication stirrup_stockings (2753) -> stirrup_legwear (3991)
create implication stirrup_stockings (2753) -> stockings (128768)
create implication stirrup_thigh_socks (49) -> stirrup_socks (3039)

Reason: I like stirrups so when i see them i tag them however i noticed that there’s a serious lack of implications. Im sure there’s more i could do but this is a start!

playingpossum said:
Reason: I like stirrups so when i see them i tag them however i noticed that there’s a serious lack of implications. Im sure there’s more i could do but this is a start!

You might consider adding

create alias stirrups -> stirrup
.
or possibly the other way around.

Current usage heavily favors the plural (about 234) to the singular (3). The usual argument in favor of the singular is "if you have more than one, you have one", but the usual argument in favor of the plural is "are there usually two or more of them in an image", which is probably true in this particular case.

There are some previous BURs on this same topic that might be useful: BUR #953 (pending) and BUR #979 (rejected), both discussed in forum topic #29733 .