Topic: semi_incest & technical_incest -> lore + renaming

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #4932 is active.

remove alias semi-incest (0) -> semi_incest (7)
change category indirect_incest_(lore) (3522) -> lore
create alias technical_incest (0) -> pseudo_incest_(lore) (3538)
change category pseudo_incest_(lore) (3538) -> lore
create alias inseki (0) -> pseudo_incest_(lore) (3538)

Reason: Extends topic #38296 to semi_incest and technical_incest, but renaming technical_incest to pseudo_incest as per comments and semi_incest to indirect_incest to (hopefully) make their purposes clearer. Part 2:

alias semi-incest -> indirect_incest_(lore)
alias semi_incest -> indirect_incest_(lore)

EDIT: The bulk update request #4932 (forum #367026) has been approved by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

Watsit

Privileged

I think these both need better names. technical_incest in particular seems to be the wrong term:

images or animations depicting characters engaging in sexual activity who are non-biologically related to each other, such as step-siblings, adopted children and in-laws

However, incest is typically considered to be sexual activity between two or more people/characters who are biologically related, and indeed that's what the incest_(lore) tag requires. So, "technical incest" would mean two or more characters are technically biologically related (that may not be considered "family", e.g. clones, genetic modification, selfcest?), which is the exact opposite intent of the tag. It always confuses me when I see it. IMO, a better term for that would be pseudo-incest, as they're part of a family unit which makes it like incest, but it's a false-incest as they're not actually biologically related.

semi_incest also seems rather confusing, though not as wrong as "technical incest". Since it's for images where there is no incest at all, just two or more family members both depicted doing sexual things specifically not with each other. I feel like there should be a better term for that than "semi incest", if it's worth having.

watsit said:
I think these both need better names. technical_incest in particular seems to be the wrong term[...]

there is the japanese term inseki meaning "sex involving in-law, step, or adopted family relatives." which is pretty much the exact same definition as our technical_incest tag. although, I'm not sure if I'm a particularly big fan of using a semi-obscure japanese fetish categorization word as the tag name, but it might be better than using a tag name that's kinda contradictory to its usage.

Watsit

Privileged

darryus said:
there is the japanese term inseki meaning "sex involving in-law, step, or adopted family relatives." which is pretty much the exact same definition as our technical_incest tag. although, I'm not sure if I'm a particularly big fan of using a semi-obscure japanese fetish categorization word as the tag name, but it might be better than using a tag name that's kinda contradictory to its usage.

I'm not a fan either of using obscure non-English terms, as they're almost assuredly not going to be obvious and can be mistaken as something else (e.g. a name). I think pseudo-incest would work fine in place of technical_incest, though.

The bulk update request #7107 is active.

remove implication accidental_incest (0) -> incest_(lore) (53164)
remove implication forced_incest (4) -> forced (96685)
remove implication forced_incest (4) -> incest_(lore) (53164)
create alias multigenerational_incest (6) -> multigenerational_incest_(lore) (184)
create implication multigenerational_incest_(lore) (184) -> incest_(lore) (53164)
create alias polygenerational_incest (3) -> polygenerational_incest_(lore) (61)
create implication polygenerational_incest_(lore) (61) -> incest_(lore) (53164)
create alias incestuous_voyeur (0) -> incestuous_voyeur_(lore) (832)
create alias pseudo_incestuous_voyeur (5) -> pseudo_incestuous_voyeur_(lore) (66)

Reason: These should also be lore tags, since they're incest related.

Part 2:

alias accidental_incest -> accidental_incest_(lore)
imply accidental_incest_(lore) -> incest_(lore)
alias forced_incest -> forced_incest_(lore)
imply forced_incest_(lore) -> incest_(lore)
imply forced_incest_(lore) -> forced_partners

Also, should selfcest be lore? There's a lot of images that probably wouldn't be obviously the same character based on TWYS:

post #4543659 post #4365534 post #1526964

I guess this would go for square_crossover as well.

EDIT: The bulk update request #7107 (forum #395889) has been approved by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

nimphia said:

Part 2:

alias accidental_incest -> accidental_incest_(lore)
imply accidental_incest_(lore) -> incest_(lore)
alias forced_incest -> forced_incest_(lore)
imply forced_incest_(lore) -> incest_(lore)
imply forced_incest_(lore) -> forced

Actually I believe forced_incest_(lore) should imply forced_partners instead of forced

forced incest (lore) means that two or more related individuals are forced to have sex with one another, and forced partners is defined as two or more individuals are forced to perform sexual/romantic acts with one another.

Updated

The bulk update request #7354 is active.

create alias accidental_incest (0) -> accidental_incest_(lore) (225)
create implication accidental_incest_(lore) (225) -> incest_(lore) (53164)
create alias forced_incest (4) -> forced_incest_(lore) (132)
create implication forced_incest_(lore) (132) -> incest_(lore) (53164)
create implication forced_incest_(lore) (132) -> forced_partners (1162)
change category multigenerational_incest_(lore) (184) -> lore
change category polygenerational_incest_(lore) (61) -> lore
change category incestuous_voyeur_(lore) (832) -> lore
change category pseudo_incestuous_voyeur_(lore) (66) -> lore
create alias technically_incestuous_voyeur (0) -> pseudo_incestuous_voyeur_(lore) (66)

Weason: pawt 2, fowwowup
Added
cweate awias technyicawwy_incestuous_voyeuw (0) -> pseudo_incestuous_voyeuw_(wowe) (21)
to fowwow technyicaw_incest -> pseudo_incest_(wowe)

EDIT: The bulk update request #7354 (forum #398520) has been approved by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

snpthecat said:
The bulk update request #7354 is active.

create alias accidental_incest (0) -> accidental_incest_(lore) (225)
create implication accidental_incest_(lore) (225) -> incest_(lore) (53164)
create alias forced_incest (4) -> forced_incest_(lore) (132)
create implication forced_incest_(lore) (132) -> incest_(lore) (53164)
create implication forced_incest_(lore) (132) -> forced_partners (1162)
change category multigenerational_incest_(lore) (184) -> lore
change category polygenerational_incest_(lore) (61) -> lore
change category incestuous_voyeur_(lore) (832) -> lore
change category pseudo_incestuous_voyeur_(lore) (66) -> lore
create alias technically_incestuous_voyeur (0) -> pseudo_incestuous_voyeur_(lore) (66)

Weason: pawt 2, fowwowup

It is cuwwently bwocked by topic #32175

accidentaw_incest_(wowe) and fowced_incest_(wowe) wiww nyeed to be changed to wowe aftew the BUW passes

Updated

Bumping because several tags now changed to have the lore suffix still need to be put in the lore category

  • 1