The bulk update request #4913 is active.

remove alias nephew_and_aunt (0) -> aunt_and_nephew (0)
remove alias niece_and_aunt (0) -> aunt_and_niece (0)
create alias aunt (0) -> aunt_(lore) (932)
create implication aunt_and_nephew_(lore) (419) -> aunt_(lore) (932)
create implication aunt_and_nephew_(lore) (419) -> nephew_(lore) (1533)
create implication aunt_and_niece_(lore) (401) -> aunt_(lore) (932)
create implication aunt_and_niece_(lore) (401) -> niece_(lore) (1002)

Reason: The reason topic #38296 had no aunt-related tags in it is that the aunt tag itself has never been implied by anything, and my script relied on the implication tree to generate the BUR. Perhaps futilely, I wanted to keep that thread as straightforward as possible and not muddy the already opaque waters even further by mixing in aliases and implications that weren't copies of existing ones.

Annoyingly, however, two compound tags that include an aunt have had aliases made, so we have to delete those before we can do the rest of this.

Curiously, it looks like aunt_and_uncle has never been used as a tag.

EDIT: The bulk update request #4913 (forum #366833) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #4913 (forum #366833) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #4931 is active.

create alias aunt_and_nephew (0) -> aunt_and_nephew_(lore) (419)
create alias nephew_and_aunt (0) -> aunt_and_nephew_(lore) (419)
create alias aunt_and_niece (0) -> aunt_and_niece_(lore) (401)
create alias niece_and_aunt (0) -> aunt_and_niece_(lore) (401)
change category aunt_and_nephew_(lore) (419) -> lore
change category aunt_and_niece_(lore) (401) -> lore

Reason: Part 2

Also category changes (why isn't this automatic)

EDIT: The bulk update request #4931 (forum #367013) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #4931 (forum #367013) has been approved by @gattonero2001.