Topic: Detachable Tags Reorganization BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #4202 is pending approval.

remove implication detachable_limbs (232) -> detachable (1502)
remove implication detachable_parts (63) -> detachable (1502)
remove alias detached_limbs (0) -> detachable_limbs (232)
remove alias detached_arm (0) -> detachable_arms (141)
remove alias detached_leg (0) -> detachable_legs (53)

Reason: Currently the detachable tag group isn't as well organized/catalogued as it should be.
Particularly the use of plural terms as the main tags instead of the singular terms.
As well as tags not being implied to a subgroup (such as detachable arm and leg tags not implying detachable_limb or detachable penis, balls and pussy tags not implying detachable_genitalia).
There are also populated detachable tags that have yet to be implied to detachable (such as detachable_genitalia, detachable_pussy and detachable_tail).

Here's the summary of the proposed changes:

  • All plural tags (detached_Xs and detachable_Xs) should be unimplied from detachable.
  • All singular tags (detached_X and detachable_X) should be unaliased from their respective plural tags (detached_Xs and detachable_Xs) tags.
  • All detached tags (detached_X and detached_Xs) and plural tags (detached_Xs and detachable_Xs) should be aliased under their respective detachable_X tags.
  • detachable_X should imply detachable.
  • All detachable limb tags (detachable_arm and detachable_leg) should imply detachable_limb.
  • detachable_genitalia should be be aliased under detachable_genitals.
  • All detachable genital tags (detachable_penis, detachable_balls and detachable_pussy) should imply detachable_genitals, detachable and their respective body parts (genitals, penis, balls or pussy).
  • detachable_tail should imply detachable. (This one was proposed years ago: topic #20816)

Note that I wasn't able to post some of the script lines due to:

# duplicate of has blocking transitive relationships, cannot be applied through BUR

and

Antecedent name has already been taken

I'll post those on the next BUR post.

Updated

These were the missing lines:

Error: Antecedent name has already been taken
alias detached_limbs -> detachable_limb
alias detached_arm -> detachable_arm
alias detached_leg -> detachable_leg
# duplicate of has blocking transitive relationships, cannot be applied through BUR
alias detachable_limbs -> detachable_limb
alias detachable_arms -> detachable_arm
alias detachable_legs -> detachable_leg

Not sure how others officially post BURs on the same topic so I'll post it here for reference.

Edit: Specified what errors or conflicts that were appearing with these lines.

Updated

dupestein said:
(...)
Not sure how others officially post BURs on the same topic so I'll post it here for reference.

For multiple BURs inside a thread, you could try making use of sections to visually organize everything, a bit like I tried to do with my pokemon BUR on topic #36441
For posting BURs inside an existing thread, take the topic number, in this case 37391, and paste it on the "Forum topic" field at the bottom of the BUR request page.

That said, if those missing lines are the ones with transitive relationships, then I believe you need to wait until your first BUR is approved. (I would simply group them inside a Section called "Part 2")
And mention what BURs are duplicate if any, that's good info too.

For BUR organization, I usualy keep the first BUR exclusive to alias/implication removals, then I re-alias and re-imply with a second BUR, and sometimes with a third in case there are many extra tags to be added.
Dividing BURs like that feel easier to manage, and for others to analyze :p

m3g4p0n1 said:
For multiple BURs inside a thread, you could try making use of sections to visually organize everything, a bit like I tried to do with my pokemon BUR on topic #36441
For posting BURs inside an existing thread, take the topic number, in this case 37391, and paste it on the "Forum topic" field at the bottom of the BUR request page.

That said, if those missing lines are the ones with transitive relationships, then I believe you need to wait until your first BUR is approved. (I would simply group them inside a Section called "Part 2")
And mention what BURs are duplicate if any, that's good info too.

For BUR organization, I usualy keep the first BUR exclusive to alias/implication removals, then I re-alias and re-imply with a second BUR, and sometimes with a third in case there are many extra tags to be added.
Dividing BURs like that feel easier to manage, and for others to analyze :p

Thanks for the advice. I'll try reorganizing my previous posts into parts like you said.

The bulk update request #4220 is pending approval.

create alias detachable_genitalia (43) -> detachable_genitals (0)
create implication detachable_genitals (0) -> detachable (1502)
create implication detachable_genitals (0) -> genitals (2252128)
create alias detached_penis (9) -> detachable_penis (247)
create implication detachable_penis (247) -> detachable_genitals (0)
create implication detachable_penis (247) -> penis (1547692)
create alias detached_balls (0) -> detachable_balls (15)
create implication detachable_balls (15) -> detachable (1502)
create implication detachable_balls (15) -> detachable_genitals (0)
create implication detachable_balls (15) -> balls (1056862)
create alias detached_pussy (0) -> detachable_pussy (31)
create implication detachable_pussy (31) -> detachable (1502)
create implication detachable_pussy (31) -> detachable_genitals (0)
create implication detachable_pussy (31) -> pussy (894561)

Reason: See topic #37391
This part concerns the detachable genitalia tags.

  • 1