Topic: [FAILED] Slit penetration

The bulk update request #3941 is active.

create implication penis_in_slit (566) -> slit_penetration (2738)
create implication penis_in_slit (566) -> penile_penetration (397662)
create implication vibrator_in_slit (39) -> vibrator (26143)
remove implication dildo_in_slit (93) -> slit_penetration (2738)
create implication tail_in_slit (31) -> slit_penetration (2738)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (94) -> slit_penetration (2738)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (94) -> tentacle_penetration (19241)

Reason: Stuff in slit implies slit penetration, just like with anal/vaginal.
dildo_in_slit -> slit_penetration is redundant because it's already implied through sex_toy_in_slit.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3941 (forum #354864) has failed: Error: tail_in_slit already implies tail_play through another implication (create implication tail_in_slit -> tail_play)

EDIT: The bulk update request #3941 (forum #354864) has been approved by @slyroon.

All the slit related tags definitely need more attention, it's all so poorly managed and tagged right now lol. +1 from me.
Potentially, see also topic #35995 for more slit-related tags?

Yet another slit BUR at topic #31719.

The bulk update request #3941 (forum #354864) has failed: Error: tail_in_slit already implies tail_play through another implication (create implication tail_in_slit -> tail_play)

The bulk update request #3941 (forum #354864) has been approved by @slyroon.