The bulk update request #3848 has been rejected.

create implication anthro_peeing (46) -> anthro (3418668)
create implication anthro_peed_on (24) -> anthro (3418668)
create implication anthro_peeing_on_anthro (0) -> anthro_peeing (46)
create implication anthro_peeing_on_anthro (0) -> anthro_peed_on (24)
create implication anthro_peeing_on_feral (1) -> anthro_peeing (46)
create implication anthro_peeing_on_feral (1) -> feral_peed_on (4)
create implication feral_peeing (45) -> feral (630178)
create implication feral_peed_on (4) -> feral (630178)
create implication feral_peeing_on_feral (7) -> feral_peeing (45)
create implication feral_peeing_on_feral (7) -> feral_peed_on (4)
create implication feral_peeing_on_anthro (9) -> feral_peeing (45)
create implication feral_peeing_on_anthro (9) -> anthro_peed_on (24)

Reason: Anthro/feral BUR revolving around peeing.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3848 (forum #353680) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

leotheairwolf said:
create implication feral_peeing_anthro (0) -> feral_peeing (0)
create implication feral_peeing_anthro (0) -> anthro_peed_on (7)

Are these meant to be just peeing instead of peeing_on like the others?

watsit said:
Are these meant to be just peeing instead of peeing_on like the others?

Thank you! I've got that little typo fixed now.

The bulk update request #3848 (forum #353680) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

Rejection reason is at topic #36869. In summary, to mitigate combinatorial explosion, the mods will be taking a different approach.