Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #45344 high_heels -> footwear has been rejected.
Reason: High heels was supposed to imply footwear two years ago but was dropped due to an error and forgotten (topic #27115).
Made a mistake of BURying this in topic #33976 (which still needs feedback by the way).
EDIT: The tag implication high_heels -> footwear (forum #339241) has been approved by @bitWolfy.
Updated by auto moderator
Doesn't this already exist? high heels --> high heeled shoes --> shoes --> footwear
strikerman said:
Doesn't this already exist? high heels --> high heeled shoes --> shoes --> footwear
Currently high heels does not imply anything itself. high heeled shoes implies both shoes and high heels.
strikerman said:
Doesn't this already exist? high heels --> high heeled shoes --> shoes --> footwear
Currently high heels doesn't imply anything. It used to imply shoes but there are some styles that didn't fit under that category (topic #27115, topic #25385, topic #33680).
Nobody uses high_heeled_shoes, and I don't see how it can be made useful in any way.
animperfectpatsy said:
Currently high heels does not imply anything itself. high heeled shoes implies both shoes and high heels.
agh I misread the tag, that's my bad
waydence said:
The tag implication #45344 high_heels -> footwear has been rejected.Reason: High heels was supposed to imply footwear two years ago but was dropped due to an error and forgotten (topic #27115).
Made a mistake of BURying this in topic #33976 (which still needs feedback by the way).
This makes a lot of sense, rather than implying shoes, high heels are a feature, not a specific kind of footwear.
The tag implication high_heels -> footwear (forum #339241) has been approved by @bitWolfy.
