Viewing sample resized to 53% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • The signature is going crazy and there seem to be some oddities in fast moving parts.
    Did the artist cut some corners, render video at something under 30 FPS and just interpolate it to 60?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • Mario69 said:
    The signature is going crazy and there seem to be some oddities in fast moving parts.
    Did the artist cut some corners, render video at something under 30 FPS and just interpolate it to 60?

    The animation of the signature seems to be by design, it's to clear and regular for it to be an error.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • NotMeNotYou said:
    The animation of the signature seems to be by design, it's to clear and regular for it to be an error.

    Main problem is that it looks like an error rather than cool animation. And more specifically interpolation error as I have seen that so many times with subtitled stuff. Also pretty visible on shadows and ceiling tiles as things warp around and frames are blending.

    And it only happens in fast parts which fits in as at those points signatures position between frames are much larger so algorithm can't determine exact location where it's supposed to be and instead just morphs stuff it can and then blends the rest. And if the original frame rate wasn't directly divisible by 60 FPS it's running now, it would explain why it's nearly constant in certain parts.

    But this is the same file that artist is sharing, so if it's indeed the case, then artist themselves have done it and that's why I said that they might've cut some corners as this method does take way less time than proper render.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 12
  • Mario69 said:
    Main problem is that it looks like an error rather than cool animation. And more specifically interpolation error as I have seen that so many times with subtitled stuff. Also pretty visible on shadows and ceiling tiles as things warp around and frames are blending.

    And it only happens in fast parts which fits in as at those points signatures position between frames are much larger so algorithm can't determine exact location where it's supposed to be and instead just morphs stuff it can and then blends the rest. And if the original frame rate wasn't directly divisible by 60 FPS it's running now, it would explain why it's nearly constant in certain parts.

    But this is the same file that artist is sharing, so if it's indeed the case, then artist themselves have done it and that's why I said that they might've cut some corners as this method does take way less time than proper render.

    I don't understand how this gets a negative score for being 100% correct. This IS caused by interpolation, especially like the kind you see in videos that use improperly configured Twixtor.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 9
  • yay female pov there is never enuff of it and if there is people need to get tagging

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
  • bakeneko said:
    This happened off screen in Jurassic park.

    Since all dinos in Jurassic Park are female it would be the other way around. Although, that thought in mind would explain how the raptor trainer in Jurassic World was so respected by his girls.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Ice_wolf said:
    Since all dinos in Jurassic Park are female it would be the other way around. Although, that thought in mind would explain how the raptor trainer in Jurassic World was so respected by his girls.

    Well you know what they say, you gotta tame dat ass.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Drawk said:
    The voice kinda annoys me, but the rest of the sounds are on par.. could there maaaybe be a version without the voice..?

    Turn off the volume?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • I just played this video side by side in VR with a Google Cardboard headset, it's fucking amazing. What if people made animations specifically for VR, imagine this video with 3D and not stretched, my brain would explode.

    Just download any VR video player on your phone and you can experience this as well.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • Drawk said:
    The voice kinda annoys me, but the rest of the sounds are on par.. could there maaaybe be a version without the voice..?

    Usually, I would agree with you, but in this particular instance, I enjoy it because she is letting her lover know just how much she belongs to him. Although, that smug grin at the end tells you he knows that she will fuck him literally anywhere.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • mairo said:
    The signature is going crazy and there seem to be some oddities in fast moving parts.
    Did the artist cut some corners, render video at something under 30 FPS and just interpolate it to 60?

    pretty sure that would just make the same frame happen twice instead of once

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • jimmybungalo said:
    pretty sure that would just make the same frame happen twice instead of once

    If you don't use interpolation or resampling, then yes, the same frame would show up twice. I have fixed a lot of videos here where artists original file is 24 FPS, but have accidentally encoded into 30 FPS file, resulting slight stutter which makes the animation look lower framerate than it is.

    However I was specifically talking about interpolation, which morphs new frames from exsisting ones, kinda like framerate upscaling which we do not allow if done by third party.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_interpolation

    Also that's 4 years old comment so I think I was even janitor back then, hence why I was downvoted for having opposing opinion that of an head admin.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • mairo said:
    If you don't use interpolation or resampling, then yes, the same frame would show up twice. I have fixed a lot of videos here where artists original file is 24 FPS, but have accidentally encoded into 30 FPS file, resulting slight stutter which makes the animation look lower framerate than it is.

    However I was specifically talking about interpolation, which morphs new frames from exsisting ones, kinda like framerate upscaling which we do not allow if done by third party.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_interpolation

    Also that's 4 years old comment so I think I was even janitor back then, hence why I was downvoted for having opposing opinion that of an head admin.

    yet you got it right. It was indeed rendered at 30 FPS then interpolated to 60 with an after effect plugin. Never did that again, because the result is just disgusting. For some times I rendered fully at 60 FPS, but then went back to 25 FPS because it's enough anyway.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • This video in particular is legendary. Hands down the most memorable of Cavafly's videos, and the cause of many great self-pleasure sessions, easily my favorite video of any porn~

    I just love that grin at the end as he dismounts and she's a moaning mess, that satisfied nod he gives... Like he's telling HER she's the "good girl" for letting him fill her up~

    And the moaning... Huff. The way she holds him as he wrecks her, it's all just, perfection~

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • This remains by far one of my favorite animations on this entire website. And that's saying something.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0