sevia created by shibara
Viewing sample resized to 24% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Love the fur and shading, but I concur.. there's no vagina. So it's not a herm. Futa(nari) or dickgirl is the term you're lookin' for.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Well we could not be seeing the vagoo, but yum, this once is nice, but I'm pretty adverse to nipple piercings though :( Kinda detracts the idea of sucking on nipples or something, *huff*

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Senta said:
    Love the fur and shading, but I concur.. there's no vagina. So it's not a herm. Futa(nari) or dickgirl is the term you're lookin' for.

    It's a herm.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • People, when it says "hermaphrodite" right on the picture, I would think there would not be the need for an argument over the issue.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Fancy-Fancy said:
    I love the close up on the facial features, really amazing work. Also the height is a perfect one.

    I agree. The image on the bottom left is undoubtedly the best in this set.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Noyl said:
    People, when it says "hermaphrodite" right on the picture, I would think there would not be the need for an argument over the issue.

    well ive talked to a number of furs that think shemales and herms are one and the same so you'll forgive me if i point out the fact that while it says its a herm only the penis is visible, also i wasnt aware there was an argument over it going on in here.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • Avery said:
    well ive talked to a number of furs that think shemales and herms are one and the same so you'll forgive me if i point out the fact that while it says its a herm only the penis is visible, also i wasnt aware there was an argument over it going on in here.

    Exactly. Hermaphrodite by definition means one has both male and female reproductive organs. Not just boobs and a dick. So, hence the argument.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Senta said:
    Exactly. Hermaphrodite by definition means one has both male and female reproductive organs. Not just boobs and a dick. So, hence the argument.

    arguments are for angry people, i prefer to call this constructive discussion :)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Senta said:
    Exactly. Hermaphrodite by definition means one has both male and female reproductive organs. Not just boobs and a dick. So, hence the argument.

    Just because the artist doesn't think you'd see it in the angles drawn doesn't mean it's not there

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • NyahMyah said:
    Just because the artist doesn't think you'd see it in the angles drawn doesn't mean it's not there

    ill give you that but all the herm model sheets ive seen show a visible vagina either from the front or back view.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Tag reverted to herm. It's not external information when the picture itself states a character's gender. This *is* a case of "tag what you see", because one can easily see 'hermaphrodite' in the image.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • TracerFox said:
    Tag reverted to herm. It's not external information when the picture itself states a character's gender. This *is* a case of "tag what you see", because one can easily see 'hermaphrodite' in the image.

    Yeah no that's not how it works. People searching for herms want to see herms. It's not "tag what you see unless there are words on the image"

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • What about elemental as species? She doesn't look like an air elemental. She's too.... substantial. Unless having the word in text counts but if the word unicorn was somehow on the pic would you put that?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Dywin_Vespin said:
    What about elemental as species? She doesn't look like an air elemental. She's too.... substantial. Unless having the word in text counts but if the word unicorn was somehow on the pic would you put that?

    No

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0