marqi (mythology) created by frostedscales
Viewing sample resized to 85% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

Marqi is very much bisexual, however most of his fans happen to be male.

And noooo thats not a pussy~ he has a cloaca, which is male genetalia for most reptiles. the penis slides out.

(its funny because this is in both his character backstory and actual people who like the character xD)

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Cloaca time... Emmm... errr.... I think... ehm... please... don't... fuck me. No... Nooooooooooooo aaaaaaaaagggggghhhhhhh!!!!

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • Robox225 said:
    Cloaca time... Emmm... errr.... I think... ehm... please... don't... fuck me. No... Nooooooooooooo aaaaaaaaagggggghhhhhhh!!!!

    yes he has a cloaca :3

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Kuvuan said:
    Obviously somebody is trying to be the good guy and "tag what you see" when really he/she is just being an asshole.

    im literally just following site rules.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Genjar

    Former Staff

    Mutisija said:
    im literally just following site rules.

    Looks like a male cloaca to me, though. That's clearly a partially erect penis, not a clitoris.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Genjar said:
    Looks like a male cloaca to me, though. That's clearly a partially erect penis, not a clitoris.

    well imo it looks like a clitoris. and also i see a vaginal opening there. someone had requested an admin here to solve this but some admin just closed the ticket without doing anything.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • Genjar

    Former Staff

    Mutisija said:
    well imo it looks like a clitoris. and also i see a vaginal opening there.

    Clitoris doesn't have an urethral opening. And that's anus down there. Exact same cloaca type as post #837901, just with half-erect penis.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • I literally don't even think the mods of e621.net though about these site rules properly. TWYS is literally putting characters on here that could be cuntboys but instead get labelled as a female with a chest, do you HONESTLY think that the original character creator would want that? I for one wouldn't. And no matter how many times somebody would try to re-tag my post of a cuntboy to a FCF I will retag it back, because my character, I know who and what he or she would be, and I want everybody to know exactly what he or she is, not what some sites rules depict it to be. And even if this is not my character, I will fight for it and FAIRER rule So! There, I said it. Now buzz off.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • Kuvuan said:
    I literally don't even think the mods of e621.net though about these site rules properly. TWYS is literally putting characters on here that could be cuntboys but instead get labelled as a female with a chest, do you HONESTLY think that the original character creator would want that? I for one wouldn't. And no matter how many times somebody would try to re-tag my post of a cuntboy to a FCF I will retag it back, because my character, I know who and what he or she would be, and I want everybody to know exactly what he or she is, not what some sites rules depict it to be. And even if this is not my character, I will fight for it and FAIRER rule So! There, I said it. Now buzz off.

    take a chill pill friend. also fun fact: by making an account here, you agreed to follow this site's rules.

    also, there is an actual reasoning behind the tag what you see rule. maybe you should read it instead of throwing a temper tantrum

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • FrostedScales said:
    Biologically correct there sir *pats*

    And yet it is still FCF, even though it's been proven.

    Mutisija said:
    take a chill pill friend. also fun fact: by making an account here, you agreed to follow this site's rules.

    also, there is an actual reasoning behind the tag what you see rule. maybe you should read it instead of throwing a temper tantrum

    You have no right to call me "friend". I'm not your friend. Also, took a look, found this: "This may seem unusual and even insensitive" and yeah, INSENSITIVE AS FUCK DONTCHA THINK ASSWIPES?!

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • Kuvuan said:
    You have no right to call me "friend". I'm not your friend. Also, took a look, found this: "This may seem unusual and even insensitive" and yeah, INSENSITIVE AS FUCK DONTCHA THINK ASSWIPES?!

    seriously calm the hell down

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Genjar said:
    Clitoris doesn't have an urethral opening. And that's anus down there. Exact same cloaca type as post #837901, just with half-erect penis.

    imo it looks more like a some sort of little detail to show shape of a clit rather than an urethral opening.

    FrostedScales said:
    Fact of the matter is that this is a bisexual MALE reptile. So a female tag does not need to be there. Just... saying ;3;

    the characters can be whatever the owner wants the to be and they can declare what their characters actually are on description and so on but the gender tags here are not meant to represent character's canonical gender. they are more like "what set of physical characteristics this character seems to have in this specific image" sort of tags

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • I'm totally onboard for TWYS, but this character really looks male in the chest area, as opposed to being flat chested and female. That's pretty square and built pectoral definition, especially considering the rest of the body is not particularly toned.

    Also, that slit is constructed improperly for a vagina. I can't really see the penis tip as a clit: There's too much empty space above it, No clitoral hood, and it appears to be thrusting upward from below instead of coming down from above as a clit would. It even has the little stretch marks around it's base showing how it's pushing the surrounding flesh back a bit.

    I think it's a bigger reach to call this one female/cuntboy than it is to call it a male with a cloaca.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Mutisija said:
    imo it looks more like a some sort of little detail to show shape of a clit rather than an urethral opening.

    the characters can be whatever the owner wants the to be and they can declare what their characters actually are on description and so on but the gender tags here are not meant to represent character's canonical gender. they are more like "what set of physical characteristics this character seems to have in this specific image" sort of tags

    yeah i guess but that stuff can lead to improper tagging and incidents like this ;3;

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • FrostedScales said:
    yeah i guess but that stuff can lead to improper tagging and incidents like this ;3;

    but anyways an admin decided that this should tagged as girly male and cloaca so we go with that. in the end my opinions are just my opinions and my word does not outweight admin's word here.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0