You must be logged in to view this image. (learn more)

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • I imagine it may or may not hurt when his balls slap back into her, depending on how soft she is.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Alia said:
    I imagine it may or may not hurt when his balls slap back into her, depending on how soft she is.

    Honestly, it doesn't look like he's at all concerned about it hurting

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • how is that blue rabbit an incubus? i see nothing demonic about him at all aside from the yellow eye but given the nature of this site that seems normal to me.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • treos said:
    how is that blue rabbit an incubus? i see nothing demonic about him at all aside from the yellow eye but given the nature of this site that seems normal to me.

    From what I remember seeing posted by one of the mods, the only exception to the TWYS rule is that character names and identities are tagged based on the information provided from the site where the picture originally came from.

    That being said, that blue "rabbit" is described by his creator as being an incubus, and the son of an archdemon succubus queen or something. Actually, lemme check something.

    *checks*

    ...Huh... okayyyy, apparently, he's described as being both a bunny AND an incubus in at least three different pictures of him drawn by his creator. Guess I'll add the rabbit tag, then... =\

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • The_Masked_Newfag said:
    From what I remember seeing posted by one of the mods, the only exception to the TWYS rule is that character names and identities are tagged based on the information provided from the site where the picture originally came from.

    That's only for character names and only when there's enough evidence of the character present to be a plausible choice.

    There is a sort of unofficial rule (more like leeway) given to species under the reasoning "well, it's better to have it tagged with a species than no species" but TWYS and common sense still override this. In other words, if the source says a character is a goat but it looks like a snake, it's still tagged snake.

    That being said, I can see nothing even remotely demonic about either of these characters, so I feel that the incubus tag is inappropriate in this case.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • parasprite said:
    That's only for character names and only when there's enough evidence of the character present to be a plausible choice.

    There is a sort of unofficial rule (more like leeway) given to species under the reasoning "well, it's better to have it tagged with a species than no species" but TWYS and common sense still override this. In other words, if the source says a character is a goat but it looks like a snake, it's still tagged snake.

    That being said, I can see nothing even remotely demonic about either of these characters, so I feel that the incubus tag is inappropriate in this case.

    you learn something new everyday around here it seems. i'm not complaining, especially when it helps prevent future mishaps and clear up confusion.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0