She's pretty cute. I'm not a fan of the thought of being with an older woman (like, MUCH older), but I wouldn't mind if she came onto me.

ChandlerTheOtter said:
I'm not a fan of the thought of being with an older woman (like, MUCH older)

She's not really that much "older" in most aspects, gargoyles just age at half the rate.. at age 6, they're still like 3 yo toddlers and so on. Thought I'd let the sheet reflect that before someone accused me of not knowing my gargology. For all intends and purposes, she's 22 :)

...

Where did you get that QR Code from?

Klaue said:
She's not really that much "older" in most aspects, gargoyles just age at half the rate.. at age 6, they're still like 3 yo toddlers and so on. Thought I'd let the sheet reflect that before someone accused me of not knowing my gargology. For all intends and purposes, she's 22 :)

Huh. That's pretty neat. Thanks for clearing that up!

I'm just curious on the sexually and top/bottom scale like do we pay attention to the black or do we pay attention to the purple?

The purple

EsalRider said:
...

Where did you get that QR Code from?

its the old QR code error trick, QR codes can handle quite a few errors here and there, its just how the algorithm works, so you can draw images with the errors and the original data still works fine.

the only problem is you get all that extra data in your code:

http://goo.gl/2fHvbi#176000950341682682666681341597341341481000000343816042597086682682421337341346597000000021251682692648341382684657512000480000030286682658682245343574512947335970512640011170662682673469586341345383060000032679938537946682953532112784000030613746676617425342600405345632806028974060010663645161669270729341331597274960002166090701425413351426575162753000000249398682634842701597274000042640576680032000234

should only be

http://goo.gl/2fHvbi

Obscenity said:
its the old QR code error trick, QR codes can handle quite a few errors here and there, its just how the algorithm works, so you can draw images with the errors and the original data still works fine.

the only problem is you get all that extra data in your code:

http://goo.gl/2fHvbi#176000950341682682666681341597341341481000000343816042597086682682421337341346597000000021251682692648341382684657512000480000030286682658682245343574512947335970512640011170662682673469586341345383060000032679938537946682953532112784000030613746676617425342600405345632806028974060010663645161669270729341331597274960002166090701425413351426575162753000000249398682634842701597274000042640576680032000234

should only be

http://goo.gl/2fHvbi[/quote]
That is not quite true. There are a way to use errors, and that doesn't even, as far as I know, result in weird URLs. The problem is that you can only assign the centerpiece. The trick here is that it's not error correction that is used, but the URL is adapted. Browsers trow away everything after the # (because that's a marker for a non-existant anchor) so that can be used to produce the image you want. It's similar but not the same ;)