Just to get this over with, I, the uploader of this, am not a zoophile. I'm simply uploading this (and possibly other pieces I find) for the sake of archival, as these sorts of accounts have a far shorter shelf life than the standard furry art account for obvious reasons.

Seek help

Ew.

anicebee said:
Just to get this over with, I, the uploader of this, am not a zoophile. I'm simply uploading this (and possibly other pieces I find) for the sake of archival, as these sorts of accounts have a far shorter shelf life than the standard furry art account for obvious reasons.

Are you even allowed to upload this sorta thing? I'd think it's against the rules or something. (But maybe not?)

kujwuf said:
Are you even allowed to upload this sorta thing? I'd think it's against the rules or something. (But maybe not?)

I don't believe uploading this sort of thing is against the rules, but discussions about the morality of zoophilia are, and seem like a very quick way to get banned for either side.

To the person who drew this (not the poster): Please seek help. You are a danger to yourself and others.

put me in the screencap

kujwuf said:
Are you even allowed to upload this sorta thing? I'd think it's against the rules or something. (But maybe not?)

According to the rules, you have to at least ask the artist for permission to avoid any problems. I don't know the rules exactly, I can't say anything.

kujwuf said:
Are you even allowed to upload this sorta thing? I'd think it's against the rules or something. (But maybe not?)

Yes, but the comments are likely to get locked and maybe hidden if they get out of hand. Discussion of the morality of zoophilia is against the rules. Any evidence that suggests someone is a zoophile (potentially even setting this as your avatar) could result in a permanent ban.

crocogator said:
Yes, but the comments are likely to get locked and maybe hidden if they get out of hand. Discussion of the morality of zoophilia is against the rules. Any evidence that suggests someone is a zoophile (potentially even setting this as your avatar) could result in a permanent ban.

Gotcha. Thanks! I was wondering.

anicebee said:
Just to get this over with, I, the uploader of this, am not a zoophile. I'm simply uploading this (and possibly other pieces I find) for the sake of archival, as these sorts of accounts have a far shorter shelf life than the standard furry art account for obvious reasons.

Why is this something worth archiving at all (except potentially as evidence against the artist)?
If it is worth archiving, why not just use archive.org or similar?
This just seems like a bad idea all around.

fortheplot said:
Why is this something worth archiving at all (except potentially as evidence against the artist)?
If it is worth archiving, why not just use archive.org or similar?
This just seems like a bad idea all around.

My guess would be the principle of the thing. The goal is to archive what meets quality standards, your opinions on the thing come after.
It's a bit like with writing down events, even what is widely considered disgusting is still history.

fortheplot said:
Why is this something worth archiving at all (except potentially as evidence against the artist)?
If it is worth archiving, why not just use archive.org or similar?
This just seems like a bad idea all around.

1. Because it's art, simple as.
2. Archiving is about accessibility, and e621's tagging system works far better at that than putting a URL noone will remember onto the Wayback Machine in this case.

My godness......anicebee,don't waste your time.
Nowadays everyone gets upset by anything. They'll get banned if they push the conversation subject,don't get headaches over dumb arguings.

IS JUST AN IMAGE Y'ALL!!!!!,damm it.