???

That fucking pedo!

*fapfapfapfapfap*

lol

Is it just me or is that girl impersonating Willy Wonka?

Really? Deletion request 'cause 'child porn'...? Wow...

Lolicon/Young
Just..Stop.

I do always find it pretty funny people flip over a drawing like this cause it two humans, yet if it was two furries of the same ages people would be like oh it fine, or its awesome

RyokoRaven said:
I do always find it pretty funny people flip over a drawing like this cause it two humans, yet if it was two furries of the same ages people would be like oh it fine, or its awesome

Seconded...

Is like, if you see something that you dont like in internet and you complain about it, beside to just ignore it, is equal to find dog shit in the streets and roll all over it squeaking it yelling: "I dont like it because smells bad.

Its not that simple. If this site is regularly hit up by this stuff the effing govt can this site down. So getting rid of it is a matter of survival. If you don't like that than change the govt. Or start your own booru/chan site.

Dear Mr deletion request are you new here?

ubervoop said:
Its not that simple. BOW DOWN TO SCARY GOV

If drawings become classified as child porn, you may have a point. As of now it's perfectly legal.

ubervoop said:
Its not that simple. If this site is regularly hit up by this stuff the effing govt can this site down. So getting rid of it is a matter of survival. If you don't like that than change the govt. Or start your own booru/chan site.

There's a dozen sites dedicated to lolicon and they're doing fine, why should e621 be a target. More to the point, if you have a problem with the site rules, then go to the forums, don't complain on the images. (Also flagging images that aren't breaking the rules is against the rules in itself)

Bruiser said:
If drawings become classified as child porn, you may have a point. As of now it's perfectly legal.

Actually it is technically illegal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornography_depicting_minors

OneManArmy said:
Actually it is technically illegal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornography_depicting_minors

Erm after reading what the wiki had to say, drawing something like this can be protected under the first amendment which is freedom of speech. Also after the Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition in 2002, congress said and I quote from the wiki,""Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech," and imposing a criminal sanction on protected speech is a "stark example of speech suppression." now please correct me if I'm wrong but by reading this case and the source you have provided this image is legal.

sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornography_depicting_minors

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pdWAcK6Eh8

THIS IS A NO NO xD
but no it is against the rules get it outta here don't want e621 to get in trouble

should be deleted because its NO FURRY, e621 is a furry porn site

shadowslick said:
should be deleted because its NO FURRY, e621 is a furry porn site

Are you trolling? "Not furry" isnt a real reason, there is a tag called human after all, e621 isnt just a furry art site you know.

shadowslick said:
should be deleted because its NO FURRY, e621 is a furry porn site

I've been told this before and I will tell you: e621 is not a furry site.

renevade said:
THIS IS A NO NO xD
but no it is against the rules get it outta here don't want e621 to get in trouble

There's a whole tag for loli.

shadowslick said:
should be deleted because its NO FURRY, e621 is a furry porn site

There are thousands of images that have been allowed despite lack of furry, if you don't like that bring it up in the forums.

shadowslick said:
should be deleted because its NO FURRY, e621 is a furry porn site

WOW! Just.....WOW!

e621 got all the shit.

child porn, furry porn, comic fetish..
you name it, e621 got it

E621, or as I like to call it in my broken French

"Pornographique sans Frontieres"

Y'all must be new here

hOw i came here WTF!!!!?

or maybe the little girl is 35 and wanted to shrink her self to look 6 for she could ask the boy next door to babysit her so called 6 yr. old

Sigh said:
or maybe the little girl is 35 and wanted to shrink her self to look 6 for she could ask the boy next door to babysit her so called 6 yr. old

I applaud you.

Sigh said:
or maybe the little girl is 35 and wanted to shrink her self to look 6 for she could ask the boy next door to babysit her so called 6 yr. old

You know in Japan, it'll fool most Americans thinking that if that anime girl is a 6 year old, or maybe disguised as a hot alien chick.

I'm a brony and I do not approve this picture

Do I defend the art and damn myself, or do I damn the art to defend myself? The sad truth of being such a person who stumbled onto the source material.

Jack's about to get smacked.
BOTH of the major invalid FFDs, rolled into one?

WHAM.

DJ-WOLFBEAT5 said:
You know in Japan, it'll fool most Americans thinking that if that anime girl is a 6 year old, or maybe disguised as a hot alien chick.

So true XD

DJ-WOLFBEAT5 said:
WOW! Just.....WOW!

Wow, one of the worst deletion requests I have seen on this site...this really went nuts.

Also thanks for the laugh Wolf.

JackRLupus said:
Pedo, Also not furry. Also Bronies. But mostly not furry

post #129717

idk...

Calcifer said:
Wow, one of the worst deletion requests I have seen on this site...this really went nuts.

Also thanks for the laugh Wolf.

Glad to make your day. Lol! XD

TheTundraTerror said:
I've been told this before and I will tell you: e621 is not a furry site.

There's a whole tag for loli.

ahh but that is cubs not child porn its a loop hole :L

OH NO!!! SHE GETTING PEDO'D!!! OOOH!!! HER INNOCECSJ...insects is shattered!!!

The next person that flags this post gets banned in the face

titaniachkt said:
The next person that flags this post gets banned in the face

Its been flagged again....

omg stop flagging this or I will make it the next lobster ban

Every once in a while the site digs it's heels in.

*shrug*

> This post was flagged for deletion by Shayd. Reason: It's STILL illegal to post these.

Then you should call the Internet Police and have them arrest the artist!

Raserei said:
Really? Deletion request 'cause 'child porn'...? Wow...

It is child porn. Which is disgusting/illegal :(

This post was flagged for deletion by Shayd. Reason: It's STILL illegal to post these.

And another one bites the dust. Ooo this is fun! Another! Another!

Is this a swipe at bronies? i mean it seems subtle because she is the one wearing the brony shirt and not him.

It's like Neo-Lobsterban.

Ponyponypony said:
It is child porn. Which is disgusting/illegal :(

FlagitFlagitFlagit
Do it, doooo it, you know you want to.

Kiparis said:
FlagitFlagitFlagit
Do it, doooo it, you know you want to.

you just wanna get him banned don't you?

This post was flagged for deletion by djjay. Reason: Ok this is clearly pedofilia. If this one doesnt get taken care of it will be reported to the authorities..

ippiki_ookami said:
And another one bites the dust. Ooo this is fun! Another! Another!

Long day huh?

ippiki_ookami said:
And another one bites the dust. Ooo this is fun! Another! Another!

Looks like someone else has now.

And another one bites
And another one bites
And another one bites
And another one bites the dust-AH!

...meh...

Oh my god. These guys keep flagging this to delete. #Inb4BannedUsers

> This post was flagged for deletion by djjay. Reason: Ok this is clearly pedofilia. If this one doesnt get taken care of it will be reported to the authorities.

This pic is a honeypot for people who don't understand the FFD guidelines.

Munkelzahn said:
> This post was flagged for deletion by djjay. Reason: Ok this is clearly pedofilia. If this one doesnt get taken care of it will be reported to the authorities.

This pic is a honeypot for people who don't understand the FFD guidelines.

While humourous, I hope it is staying simply to catch dumb people lol

CamKitty said:
While humourous, I hope it is staying simply to catch dumb people lol

It's like a flytrap.

STOP LOOKING AT THE LIGHT!
"we can't help it, it's so beutiful!"

Renard_Queenston said:
Looks like someone else has now.

And another one bites
And another one bites
And another one bites
And another one bites the dust-AH!

Giving you an internet just won't cover the epicness.

Omg come on please flag it again so we can get rid of the butthurt users!
Thats just one less faggot flagging good posts! :D

Dominion said:
It's like a flytrap.

Well at least the new lobster ban has a basis in the rules of the site lol

DarkWolf6052 said:
Oh my god. These guys keep flagging this to delete. #Inb4BannedUsers

I'm not convinced you know what nb4 means.

Imaderule34 said:
Is this a swipe at bronies? i mean it seems subtle because she is the one wearing the brony shirt and not him.

No. This is actually a part of Fogbank's ongoing series that has been around for years, it just happens to give an MLP reference which prompted me to upload it to twentypercentcooler (it was deleted for being off-topic so I posted it here).

So far, this post has been flagged 6 times:
http://e621.net/post_flag_history?name=&post_id=333361&reason=&order=date

Munkelzahn said:
So far, this post has been flagged 6 times:
http://e621.net/post_flag_history?name=&post_id=333361&reason=&order=date

but! it will survive.

Personally I think this should be deleted because its absolute crap, completely unrealistic in that it would never fucking work, and most likely thought up by some fat slimy recluse motherfucker with no life, social skills, or education whatsoever. >_>

Also, I found this while searching for "Fluttershy" which just pisses me off more than you can imagine. >_<

DJ_COL-7 said:
Personally I think this should be deleted because its absolute crap, completely unrealistic in that it would never fucking work, and most likely thought up by some fat slimy recluse motherfucker with no life, social skills, or education whatsoever. >_>

Are... are you OK? No, are you on the right site?

Renard_Queenston said:
Are... are you OK? No, are you on the right site?

It's just upsetting to see garbage like this is all. I know its not against the rules and wont be deleted. Frankly I could really care less. I was just pointing out the more likely reason this image has stirred so much controversy.

DJ_COL-7 said:
Also, I found this while searching for "Fluttershy" which just pisses me off more than you can imagine. >_<

e621:blacklist

DJ_COL-7 said:
Also, I found this while searching for "Fluttershy" which just pisses me off more than you can imagine. >_<

>calls someone a "fat slimy recluse motherfucker with no life, social skills, or education whatsoever"

>searches MLP

I found that funny.

I like how people were warned not to FFD or get banned and yet people still did it.

Here's another image of this girl Mandy, but here she's draw by the popular artist Bleedman - https://e621.net/post/show/334492

DJ_COL-7 said:
Personally I think this should be deleted because its absolute crap, completely unrealistic in that it would never fucking work, and most likely thought up by some fat slimy recluse motherfucker with no life, social skills, or education whatsoever. >_>

Says the guy browsing a furry porn archive.

This definitely deserves the "lol_comments" tag XD

DJ_COL-7 said:
It's just upsetting to see garbage like this is all. I know its not against the rules and wont be deleted. Frankly I could really care less. I was just pointing out the more likely reason this image has stirred so much controversy.

Are you just mad because you don't have the balls to flag it?

this really should be deleted. everyone comes here to look at furry porn the only thing this this that is furry is the shirt and that doesn't count in my book. Or the rules. as far as i know.

Rainbow_Dash said:
omg stop flagging this or I will make it the next lobster ban

Okay I am just wondering, what is a lobster ban? I have never heard that term before and am curious.

Calcifer said:
Okay I am just wondering, what is a lobster ban? I have never heard that term before and am curious.

post #83484
New admins are softies, there should be 8 people banned for 10,000 days.

Graymane said:
this really should be deleted. everyone comes here to look at furry porn the only thing this this that is furry is the shirt and that doesn't count in my book. Or the rules. as far as i know.

Non-furry images are not against the rules(mods may choose to keep or delete them). Also, you can't speak for all e621 users, note this image has been favorited 32 times and a similar image by a Japanese artist got over 100 favs https://e621.net/post/show/331222

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
post #83484
New admins are softies, there should be 8 people banned for 10,000 days.

Thanks, that was amusing to look up.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
post #83484
New admins are softies, there should be 8 people banned for 10,000 days.

I find it funny a guy got a never ending ban over that flag, yet rainbow dash at the time did the same thing yet didnt get banned XD

Conker said:
I find it funny a guy got a never ending ban over that flag, yet rainbow dash at the time did the same thing yet didnt get banned XD

prove it. link please.

im thinking some people are just afraid history might repeat; unfortunately they dont realize how a drawing like this aint gonna do much at all.

masterwave said:
im thinking some people are just afraid history might repeat; unfortunately they dont realize how a drawing like this aint gonna do much at all.

oooooh dear

Imaderule34 said:
oooooh dear

check under site status, first sentence, if you didn't read what i was referencing.

masterwave said:
check under site status, first sentence, if you didn't read what i was referencing.

oh no i read it. that was my reaction.

Imaderule34 said:
prove it. link please.

This user was banned by mellis
Reason:

LOBSTERBANNED (also a coward, unlike the MANLY MardukRising)

Expires: Never

https://e621.net/post_flag_history/index?post_id=83484 It was in what I quoted. There is the flag history

Conker said:
This user was banned by mellis
Reason:

LOBSTERBANNED (also a coward, unlike the MANLY MardukRising)

Expires: Never

https://e621.net/post_flag_history/index?post_id=83484 It was in what I quoted. There is the flag history

this isn't the first time i've seen an admin break the rules. I saw Princess celestia role playing once. well what can we do agansit the might of the admin.......

You know what? NO!

Is this the way we will live out our time on this site. being driven so hard by beings who feel they are higher than there own law? NO! fight the powah! We deserve an e621 where the bull shit over tagging is put to rest and we can tag and view all the best porn the internet has to offer. An e621 where all fandoms can gather and view images together without having to battle of superiority or for what belongs on this site! Fight the powah! This is the place where all porn, comics, gifs, memes and all the epic things on the internet gather and they will form into a double helix and break a whole in the internet so large one they will remember the name E621 for generations to come!!! FIGHT THE POWAH!!

Imaderule34 said:
this isn't the first time i've seen an admin break the rules. I saw Princess celestia role playing once. well what can we do agansit the might of the admin.......

Oh yeah I saw that as well before, admins and mods have a bit more leeway then the normal user...and when a normal member sees a mod/admin breaking any rules it sets a bad example for them.

All I can say about the perm ban on the flag was that was in the old days of worse admin-ship and more bans for little ot no reason, however that doesn't or well shouldn't give mod/or/admin the right to break the same rules that members would be punished for even if its just a joke. But as I said before they have more leeway then normal members, not much as can do about that.

Imaderule34 said:
this isn't the first time i've seen an admin break the rules. I saw Princess celestia role playing once. well what can we do agansit the might of the admin.......

You know what? NO!

Is this the way we will live out our time on this site. being driven so hard by beings who feel they are higher than there own law? NO! fight the powah! We deserve an e621 where the bull shit over tagging is put to rest and we can tag and view all the best porn the internet has to offer. An e621 where all fandoms can gather and view images together without having to battle of superiority or for what belongs on this site! Fight the powah! This is the place where all porn, comics, gifs, memes and all the epic things on the internet gather and they will form into a double helix and break a whole in the internet so large one they will remember the name E621 for generations to come!!! FIGHT THE POWAH!!

amen

Conker said:
I find it funny a guy got a never ending ban over that flag, yet rainbow dash at the time did the same thing yet didnt get banned XD

Actually, that's not true, check the date of Dash's flagging.

Which is worse than the other? Photos of children getting sex, drawing pictures of children getting sex?

Which is worse than those? Photos of animals getting sex, or drawings of animals getting sex?

Which is worse than the above? Drawing pictures of anthro animal teenagers getting sex or Dr. Phil?

The things we all fantasize about aren't necessarily the things we would do in real life

Imaderule34 said:
Is this the way we will live out our time on this site. being driven so hard by beings who feel they are higher than there own law? NO! fight the powah! We deserve an e621 where the bull shit over tagging is put to rest and we can tag and view all the best porn the internet has to offer. An e621 where all fandoms can gather and view images together without having to battle of superiority or for what belongs on this site! Fight the powah! This is the place where all porn, comics, gifs, memes and all the epic things on the internet gather and they will form into a double helix and break a whole in the internet so large one they will remember the name E621 for generations to come!!! FIGHT THE POWAH!!

Amen brother! Hell-freakin'-Yeah! Fight da Powah!

Conker said:
I find it funny a guy got a never ending ban over that flag, yet rainbow dash at the time did the same thing yet didnt get banned XD

Why would we ban a current admin over breaking an archaic and expired "rule" made by a former admin who isnt even here anymore?

The mellis lobsterban was never a rule. It was a game he created to boost his ban count an flex his admin boner.

Kind of like this.

Enkidu6 said:
Actually, that's not true, check the date of Dash's flagging.

I mentioned that in my comment.

ippiki_ookami said:
Why would we ban a current admin over breaking an archaic and expired "rule" made by a former admin who isnt even here anymore?

The mellis lobsterban was never a rule. It was a game he created to boost his ban count an flex his admin boner.

Kind of like this.

I never said you should, I am not even saying lobsterban is any official rule. Now flagging for reasons like "I do not like it" or "IT OFFENDS ME" is against the rules for valid flags, which is what that flag rainbow dash did....All I am saying is, when mods/admins flag things for false reasons, it just sets a bad example for new members viewing said flags and may even cause for them to break said rules themselves.

I'm tempted to favourite this just for the comments.

Almost 100 comments

Is there a pic with more comments than this one anywhere on this site? ... Seriously, show me if there is. I've been struck by extreme curiosity.

Hiatuss said:
Is there a pic with more comments than this one anywhere on this site? ... Seriously, show me if there is. I've been struck by extreme curiosity.

Yes, there are 22 images with over 100 comments https://e621.net/post?tags=order%3Acomments

TheHuskyK9 said:
Almost 100 comments

....and that has been Counting with E621 101

And another lobsterban is incoming. This time to privileged user. He should have known better.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
And another lobsterban is incoming. This time to privileged user. He should have known better.

Oh wow this will be fun to watch. Duh duh, another one bites the dust...

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
And another lobsterban is incoming. This time to privileged user. He should have known better.

Not defending or anything, but to someone who doesn't read the comments on pictures and don't know that the admins have this game going, I could see why someone who should "know better" would flag this :P

Conker said:
Oh wow this will be fun to watch. Duh duh, another one bites the dust...

And another one bites
And another one bites
And another one bites the dust-AH!

CamKitty said:
Not defending or anything, but to someone who doesn't read the comments on pictures and don't know that the admins have this game going, I could see why someone who should "know better" would flag this :P

Add to the fact that everyone knows " Irrelevant to site" is up to a admin to decide and not the user, they shouldnt have flagged this anyway comment or not.

Conker said:
Add to the fact that everyone knows " Irrelevant to site" is up to a admin to decide and not the user, they shouldnt have flagged this anyway comment or not.

True enough. Heck my last neutral mark was on a rule they aren't even sure on. I've stopped trying to help with flags since then :P

CamKitty said:
True enough. Heck my last neutral mark was on a rule they aren't even sure on. I've stopped trying to help with flags since then :P

Rules have been clear all the time. Don't flag thing because of bad quality, and "Failure to follow these guidelines may result in disciplinary action against your account." May. So if other people didn't get warned it's not the reason why you can't be warned. It's like with posting not furry pic. It may be deleted but it also can stay.

So, please don't blame others on your disability to understand written text.

Also guy flagged like 9 more pictures for "irrelevant content". One bad flag can be excused, but this?

no, why did you do that fur_in_the_dark?!

masterwave said:
no, why did you do that fur_in_the_dark?!

this guy need to be banned. apparently he's going on a crusade tagging everything as Irrelevant today.

110 comments(+1)... This post will now crash.

furballs_dc said:
110 comments(+1)... This post will now crash.

nope. like i said. I got a feeling this post will survive through the worst.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
Rules have been clear all the time. Don't flag thing because of bad quality, and "Failure to follow these guidelines may result in disciplinary action against your account." May. So if other people didn't get warned it's not the reason why you can't be warned. It's like with posting not furry pic. It may be deleted but it also can stay.

So, please don't blame others on your disability to understand written text.

"Make an effort to post quality, finished, non-repost images. Avoid crap-quality things like tiny images, grainy images, motivational poster memes, screenshots, image macros, images with absurdly huge and extremely annoying watermarks, etc. Off-topic images and any potential fallout from posting them are subject to the whims of the moderators. In other words, don't post non-furry art if you aren't okay with it being deleted."

Ya low quality meme stuff IS grey and the site is still not sure of it.

And wow, people representing the site really should work on their tone lol

Imaderule34 said:
nope. like i said. I got a feeling this post will survive through the worst.

that's a shame bro

masterwave said:
that's a shame bro

what? do you dissagree? i know Fur_in_the_dark_ is on the lose flagging everything today. but i still think this will make it.

Imaderule34 said:
what? do you dissagree? i know Fur_in_the_dark_ is on the lose flagging everything today. but i still think this will make it.

nah, i was talking about fur_in_the_dark and the flagging

CamKitty said:
stuff

I'm not a mod/admin, so I don't think that I represent the site.
Sorry for tone and yeah, that can be a little confusing but the bold text about not tagging for subjective reason that you didn't quoted also counts. I still don't see this as enough reason for writing "I've stopped trying to help with X since then" every time you comment about X. That kind of behaviour irritates me.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
I'm not a mod/admin, so I don't think that I represent the site.

As a Test Janitor, you kinda do in a way. Or at least thats how I see it

Conker said:
As a Test Janitor, you kinda do in a way. Or at least thats how I see it

I see this as being tested whether am I competent enough to be given right to help site in another way (approving/deleting posts). I'm still just helping the site.

dat flag histoty

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
I see this as being tested whether am I competent enough to be given right to help site in another way (approving/deleting posts). I'm still just helping the site.

...and in having that title, you do represent the site in some small way.

Xch3l said:
dat flag histoty

Well at least the last one was the first not to claim child porn :P

CamKitty said:
Well at least the last one was the first not to claim child porn :P

I feel like listening to another one bites the dust every time I check this image, I don't even like this image but what it has become is hilarious.

What the fuck is this comment section.

SirAntagonist said:
What the fuck is this comment section.

Whining and bitching.
I almost want to say "Let's go full Third Reich on this shit, and delete people who complained about the image in the comments instead of flagging it."

TIME TO CLEAN UP THE FILTH.

Conker said:
...and in having that title, you do represent the site in some small way.

By that logic every user represents the site. And honestly I think if a user earned a rank like that then changed the way they acted then that may be a bit of a betrayal since who they were was good enough to earn that rank.

Imaderule34 said:
nope. like i said. I got a feeling this post will survive through the worst.

This post isn't going anywhere

The girl looks like she's in a trance or something. Dat emotionless face...

If I were to represent something I would like to represent all those couch potatoes out there who would like to but are too lazy to represent something.

Kiparis said:
Whining and bitching.
I almost want to say "Let's go full Third Reich on this shit, and delete people who complained about the image in the comments instead of flagging it."

TIME TO CLEAN UP THE FILTH.

We haven't deleted anyone.
Nor have we the capacity to do so.

ippiki_ookami said:
We haven't deleted anyone.
Nor have we the capacity to do so.

Invent a binary cannon then, Ippiki-kun.
De-rez the shit out of them.

You know you want to.

Calcifer said:
By that logic every user represents the site. And honestly I think if a user earned a rank like that then changed the way they acted then that may be a bit of a betrayal since who they were was good enough to earn that rank.

We all do. However bigger titles represent the site more then normal members.

Conker said:
We all do. However bigger titles represent the site more then normal members.

I disagree, personally I think the bulk of members has a greater influence on the experience of this site than one mod or admin, besides that the mods and admins here are a lot better than most sites I have been to.

ippiki_ookami said:
I'm not convinced you know what nb4 means.

heheh
i giggled
looool inb4 i get banned when i flag this

Kiparis said:
Invent a binary cannon then, Ippiki-kun.
De-rez the shit out of them.

You know you want to.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBrSV-SarPE

Xch3l said:
dat flag histoty

oh fur_in_the_dark, why did you do that?

Perspective is a bit off, art ain't that good.

Oh, and the comments are a quite amusing as well.

I wonder if everypony is done flagging this now, honestly I don't get why this pic in particular got such a heavy deletion attempt.

Calcifer said:
I wonder if everypony is done flagging this now, honestly I don't get why this pic in particular got such a heavy deletion attempt.

Because people have never got the thought through their head that if they don't want to see a certain kink/fetish that they should blacklist it.

Peekaboo said:
Perspective is a bit off, art ain't that good.

Oh, and the comments are a quite amusing as well.

dude, that's scarier than this!

Peekaboo said:
Because people have never got the thought through their head that if they don't want to see a certain kink/fetish that they should blacklist it.

Yeah but this one in particular got a lot of sudden attention.

This post was flagged for deletion by Doofydoofspasta. Reason: If fluttershy wasn't here, it would not be here..

LOOK OUT!!! INCOMING BAN, AHHHH!!!!

The legal status of Cartoon pornography varies from country to country... In the United States, cartoon porn that does not contain depictions of minors generally falls under the category of speech protected by the First Amendment.

Make sure to tag young/loli/shota/cub-looking images as such for legal reasons involving weird backwards-land countries like Canada and Australia.

Why is stuff like this ever a problem in the first place? ._.

Guys this is the internet. A place where anything is possible and you must learn to expect things that you don't want to see. So if you don't like it then please got off the internet or learn just to ignore it. Have a great day in the world of the internet

DarkFallenWolf said:
Guys this is the internet. A place where anything is possible and you must learn to expect things that you don't want to see. So if you don't like it then please got off the internet or learn just to ignore it. Have a great day in the world of the internet

http://www.1112.net/lastpage.html

If this isn't supposed to be allowed on the site, then why did an admin approve it, huh? *runs out of the post before getting bombarded with replies*

I didn't know.

Doofydoofspasta said:
I didn't know.

Now you do. If you followed the terms of service you would have been led to the rules, which make clear the acceptable flagging reasons.

pssh. i knew this would survive here.
Even if there are a shit load of comments.

wtf this hasnt been flagged in 10 days. you guys aren...learning are you?

ippiki_ookami said:
wtf this hasnt been flagged in 10 days. you guys aren...learning are you?

i could flag it for you.
if you like.

ippiki_ookami said:
wtf this hasnt been flagged in 10 days. you guys aren...learning are you?

Okay...

>150 comments

Holy shit. Really?

ippiki_ookami said:
wtf this hasnt been flagged in 10 days. you guys aren...learning are you?

Weeding out stupid people has nothing to do with learning lol

Aww, I was late to the party...

ippiki_ookami said:
>calls someone a "fat slimy recluse motherfucker with no life, social skills, or education whatsoever"

>searches MLP

I found that funny.

I find that insulting admin.

Imaderule34 said:
I find that insulting admin.

good for you

We got a new flagger ladies and gentleman

Some furries will whine about anything.

Can you sort the posts on e621 by how often they've been flagged for deletion?

ippiki_ookami said:
good for you

Hope it was good for you too.

lol...
new neolobster
someone serve up some butter and lemon wedges, we are having seafood tonight!

titaniachkt said:
The next person that flags this post gets banned in the face

Rainbow_Dash said:
omg stop flagging this or I will make it the next lobster ban

ippiki_ookami said:
words

Hey guys we got a new lobster that needs to be buttered up, enjoy :D

This is why you don't have a diploma Rigby.

Good lord...this is like a train wreak I just can't not look...how many people have been canned because of this post?

AzureDreams said:
Good lord...this is like a train wreak I just can't not look...how many people have been canned because of this post?

At least five. Maybe six.

AzureDreams said:
Good lord...this is like a train wreak I just can't not look...how many people have been canned because of this post?

Napa39 said:
At least five. Maybe six.

As of 6/21/2013
|||||||||||||
Jun 19, 2013 rigby42 child porn
Jun 05, 2013 Doofydoofspasta If fluttershy wasn't here, it would not be here.
Jun 03, 2013 Fur_in_the_dark Irrelevant to site
Jun 01, 2013 snotbucket child pornography
May 31, 2013 spiceman child porn
May 30, 2013 JKinsley child porn
May 30, 2013 djjay Ok this is clearly pedofilia. If this one doesnt get taken care of it will be reported to the authorities.
May 30, 2013 Shayd It's STILL illegal to post these.
May 30, 2013 Infernowtsn WRONG!!!
May 29, 2013 JackRLupus Pedo, Also not furry. Also Bronies. But mostly not furry.
May 28, 2013 ghost010 child porn
|||||||||||||
The lobsterban warning was made after the first 2 flaggers, so they got away with it, after that however the rest of the flaggers are effected. So yeah its more then 6.

Er mer gerd dis iz childz pronz flerg fer delertion!

Enkidu6 said:
Mandy was drawn by Bleedman - https://e621.net/post/show/334492

Ah, that got deleted after 2 weeks. You can see it here - http://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/454002

so... you guys don't have a Snacks type admin... Do you?

11 flags. You'd think people would learn by now.

Hey For once there is no red banner around the thumbnail

you think they have learned finaly?

AzureDreams said:
you think they have learned finaly?

...Not in the slightest. But kind of a skeptic.

Anyone save this pic I'd love to see it