nintendo and etc created by imgonnaloveyou
Viewing sample resized to 88% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Literal perfection.
    The affectionate hand on her cheek with the paw on top just hits different.
    We need more of this

  • Reply
  • |
  • 88
  • lusians said:
    Cearfull with thos implications

    One can appreciate the beautiful shape of canine vaginal structure and enjoy the accuracy of it being on a dog Pokémon, but realize fucking dogs in real life is a bad thing. Fiction and real life are different. Fiction is to view, enjoy, and consume and explore things not moral or legal or current in a healthy manner while realizing that this stuff is separate from reality. In reality those things are not to be acted upon because, along with being morally wrong, its illegal.

    Animal genitalia is sexy.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 167
  • Through the power of fiction and imagination, this lucario has consented to this sexual intercourse. Your dog cannot because it is a real thing which can’t have the mental capacity to do so. The instinct to breed is also not consent. Consent is something only intelligent beings can do. Your dog is not intelligent. Smart? Cute? Sure. Does not understand what sex or intelligence or consent is and thus cannot consent. Pokémon, depending on how the story is being told, could. And it’s up to you to fill in the blanks correctly. If you’re not, gross.

    Zoophilia is not a fetish, it is literally defined as an attraction to a nonhuman animal. Until we discover aliens or make intelligent life, that human part will stay as humans only. It also doesn’t mention consent, so in every single IRL example, it is bad. But fictional is once again up to the creator and you filling in the rest.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 18
  • Everyone, please take this inappropriate conversation elsewhere. I am good friends with the artist, one of their admins for a small community they run, and I support them for wanting to draw lovely fictional art for people to enjoy.

    However, they do not want anything to do with zoophilia and they do not support zoophilia. In not wanting anything to do with it, that includes any and all drama of you all arguing about it on their art. Seriously, it is stressful to an artist when all they want to do is create art and share it, but then they find people starting drama when they try to do so.

    If you're here to enjoy the piece, please do so and show your support to the artist.

    If you're here to debate about zoophilia, please drop it and move on. This isn't the place.

    Thank you

  • Reply
  • |
  • 55
  • user_1079811 said:
    e621 is mainly zoophila

    No no, e621 is not a website full of zoophilia. The vast majority is of fictional characters capable of consenting within the medium they're created, being fictional and whatnot.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 45
  • Lol imgonnaloveyou, imagine making something so beautiful and well done that people come specifically to YOUR post to rant about topics that are not even relevant to your art.

    That's how you know you did something good!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 20
  • knotty_curls said:
    Next comment gets a free suspension, no questions asked. Ruining my New Years with this shit smh

    Honestly I just hope you have a nice day ngl. Sorry about everyone here ruining new years for you, have a wonderful new years!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 13
  • knotty_curls said:
    bookending this - fun's over

    I saw this image and saw your admin comment up top. Laughed at it because i had no idea what was under it. Oh boy i understand why you said that now

  • Reply
  • |
  • 23
  • My god the comment thread is hilarious, how do y'all get so worked up and angy about smut.

    Anyway, it's nice stuff. Always had a soft spot for the cutsier things and the animal anatomy so this is just very, very good for me.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • Okay, this is genuinely hot and wholesome, I love this artwork and the time it took to create such a fantastic picture. The smile from Lucario is a chef's kiss, please keep making great art like this.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • raehusky said:
    Not in all countries or even states.

    This is a misconception, just because something is not specifically stated to be illegal does not mean it is legal. Beastiality falls under animal abuse or rape so the specific crime doesn't have to be mentioned as other laws already cover it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • igsa101 said:
    This is a misconception, just because something is not specifically stated to be illegal does not mean it is legal. Beastiality falls under animal abuse or rape so the specific crime doesn't have to be mentioned as other laws already cover it.

    It depends on each country. In my country (and in Germany, if I remember correctly), having sex with animals is legal as long as the non-human subject is not forced and therefore physically/psychologically harmed.

    For that reason, here bestiality is not always considered animal abuse.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10