"anatomically correct"
on a dinosaur only image?
I'm sorry but did we find a fossil of a T rex dick?
in all fairness this is a good image, and I love the idea of a Rex or some other top predator fucking prey rather than just... eating it

cutest_mew said:
"anatomically correct"
on a dinosaur only image?
I'm sorry but did we find a fossil of a T rex dick?

Nope, and it's soft tissue, so highly unlikely we ever will. Also as far as we know, it's very, very likely they had cloacas, so... maybe not anatomically correct.

mxsz said:
Nope, and it's soft tissue, so highly unlikely we ever will. Also as far as we know, it's very, very likely they had cloacas, so... maybe not anatomically correct.

Having a cloaca is correct, however it is very likely they had phallus's. Most scientists that research this sort of thing agree that dinosaurs had to have had penises in order to reproduce, and likely long ones at that. There are plenty of examples of large avians around today who have cloaca's as well as penises. Ratites, for example, but also crocodilians and also reptiles. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2258023-dinosaur-fossil-with-preserved-genital-orifice-hints-how-they-mated/

I would argue anatomically correct is used correctly here as, while we may never know what a dinosaur penis looked like due to soft tissues being VERY rare to fossilize, we can infer what it may have looked like from living relatives, such as avians (ratites, which was used here) or crocodilians.

mm love me some tyrannosaur cock