Huh. I don't quite understand why this has so many downvotes.

xeskir said:
Huh. I don't quite understand why this has so many downvotes.

maybe because an inexistant man died and that's their way to cry or mourn

treebutnever said:
maybe because an inexistant man died and that's their way to cry or mourn

Ah yes, classic, people downvoting content and comments because rather than voting based on the quality of the piece, they'd rather show their inability to use the blacklist.

xEskir said:

treebutnever said:
maybe because an inexistant man died and that's their way to cry or mourn

Ah yes, classic, people downvoting content and comments because rather than voting based on the quality of the piece, they'd rather show their inability to use the blacklist.

Counterpoint, have you ever tried to filter out JUST what you dont want to see without filtering stuff you dont want to see? Not all posts are tagged equally.

blue_s'irra said:
Ah yes, classic, people downvoting content and comments because rather than voting based on the quality of the piece, they'd rather show their inability to use the blacklist.

Counterpoint, have you ever tried to filter out JUST what you dont want to see without filtering stuff you dont want to see? Not all posts are tagged equally.
[/quote]

What do you mean?

if you don't like it, couldn't you just move on?

blue_s'irra said:
Counterpoint, have you ever tried to filter out JUST what you dont want to see without filtering stuff you dont want to see? Not all posts are tagged equally.

I have no idea what you just said.
And yeah, you're right. Not all posts are tagged equally.
Unless you mean to tell me that stuff like this upsets you so much you lose the abillity to add the appropriate tags and then move on, I don't see the problem?

xeskir said:
Ah yes, classic, people downvoting content and comments because rather than voting based on the quality of the piece, they'd rather show their inability to use the blacklist.

well, judged solely based on quality, this piece is at best a boring generic art style with painfully low resolution and no shading, and at worst a rushed job made solely for shock value. therefore, this piece still wholly deserves all the downvotes it has.

hooda_the_antagonist said:
well, judged solely based on quality, this piece is at best a boring generic art style with painfully low resolution and no shading, and at worst a rushed job made solely for shock value. therefore, this piece still wholly deserves all the downvotes it has.

Or done by a growing artist as a quick gift.

hooda_the_antagonist said:
well, judged solely based on quality, this piece is at best a boring generic art style with painfully low resolution and no shading, and at worst a rushed job made solely for shock value. therefore, this piece still wholly deserves all the downvotes it has.

I don't even know where to start contesting your statement since it's so wrong on so many levels.
> Shading is a requirement for quality now? Or resolution? What about pixel art/porn? Sketches?
> How do you define a "Boring, Generic" artstyle? Anatomy checks out, proportions (mostly) check out.
What is he supposed to do, make the lines rainbow colored?
> There is art with objectively worse quality on here that still get better ratios than this simply because of subject matter. No, quality-wise, you can't claim this deserves all the downvotes.