I like how she just changed Expression from Pleasurable to Seriousness, because cervix penetration is still painful even if you are well-trained.

9011kcor said:
You can't penetrate the cervix, I'm not really sure what the artist was trying to draw. You can only, at best, rub against it.

In real life, yes, you are correct. However this is a talking animal on two legs, so i dont think realism should be applied here lol

9011kcor said:
You can't penetrate the cervix, I'm not really sure what the artist was trying to draw. You can only, at best, rub against it.

bruh, if a bedbug can STAB THROUGH THE ABDOMIN to have sex, I think we have more than enough biological leeway to decide that furries can have their cervix penetrated.

I understand what you guys mean, I don't really remember why I wrote that I didn't understand what the artist drew, clearly obviously anything is possible in fiction. And I'm sure I realised that at the time, I've even seen cervical penetration images before. Maybe I was confused because I didn't think it looked like a cervix because the fact it completely stretched open to look like the vagina? And with the fact that it's not stated it's a cervix either (maybe in the parent it does), I maybe didn't think it was a cervix and thought is was something else altogether? Now I obviously do think it is.

But anyway what I thought (and still think) the first comment was implying is that you can very much penetrate the cervix in reality and that it's painful... Probably because you literally can't know if something is painful if it's not even possible to do... unless you assume I guess? But even then, painful wouldn't be the word to describe it, it would be completely excruciating (if possible) from experiences I've heard concerning stuff with the cervix.
I just find extremely odd to describe a fictional event as painful you know? There's no way to know? You'd have to assume from other things concerning the cervix or just make it up? Anyways that's why I wrote the comment.

9011kcor said:
I understand what you guys mean, I don't really remember why I wrote that I didn't understand what the artist drew, clearly obviously anything is possible in fiction. And I'm sure I realised that at the time, I've even seen cervical penetration images before. Maybe I was confused because I didn't think it looked like a cervix because the fact it completely stretched open to look like the vagina? And with the fact that it's not stated it's a cervix either (maybe in the parent it does), I maybe didn't think it was a cervix and thought is was something else altogether? Now I obviously do think it is.

But anyway what I thought (and still think) the first comment was implying is that you can very much penetrate the cervix in reality and that it's painful... Probably because you literally can't know if something is painful if it's not even possible to do... unless you assume I guess? But even then, painful wouldn't be the word to describe it, it would be completely excruciating (if possible) from experiences I've heard concerning stuff with the cervix.
I just find extremely odd to describe a fictional event as painful you know? There's no way to know? You'd have to assume from other things concerning the cervix or just make it up? Anyways that's why I wrote the comment.

You CAN penetrate the cervix. You should not, as it is P-A-I-N-F-U-L, but indeed possible.

saiavinn said:
Don't talk out your ass, moron.
The cervix only allows that kind of painful expansion during childbirth, and that alone, and it is a slow and steady process triggered by a constant flow of appropriate hormones.

Cervical penetration is nothing but a played up fantasy.

I mean, talking to someone like that really engenders positivity. Do you know about the IUS? That is inserted via a probe which - you guessed it - must PENETRATE THE CERVIX. I didn't say with a penis.

After much degenerate research, i can confirm it is indeed possible to penetrate the cervix, without causing pain. Not with a phallus mind you but still possible. If anyone is curious you may find such materials on xvideos. Be warned though, it is strong fetish material, blame not me for your own decisions. BTW you may also stumble upon urethral play.

saiavinn said:
Don't talk out your ass, moron.
The cervix only allows that kind of painful expansion during childbirth, and that alone, and it is a slow and steady process triggered by a constant flow of appropriate hormones.

Cervical penetration is nothing but a played up fantasy.

You havent dug deep enough on the internet clearly, because I and many others have seen it be done.

9011kcor said:
I understand what you guys mean, I don't really remember why I wrote that I didn't understand what the artist drew, clearly obviously anything is possible in fiction. And I'm sure I realised that at the time, I've even seen cervical penetration images before. Maybe I was confused because I didn't think it looked like a cervix because the fact it completely stretched open to look like the vagina? And with the fact that it's not stated it's a cervix either (maybe in the parent it does), I maybe didn't think it was a cervix and thought is was something else altogether? Now I obviously do think it is.

But anyway what I thought (and still think) the first comment was implying is that you can very much penetrate the cervix in reality and that it's painful... Probably because you literally can't know if something is painful if it's not even possible to do... unless you assume I guess? But even then, painful wouldn't be the word to describe it, it would be completely excruciating (if possible) from experiences I've heard concerning stuff with the cervix.
I just find extremely odd to describe a fictional event as painful you know? There's no way to know? You'd have to assume from other things concerning the cervix or just make it up? Anyways that's why I wrote the comment.

jeez ya typed up a new religion, were talking about. a furry here, everyone knows that they have the infinite void of space inside them, and anything with a hole on them can be penetrated.

micwhaley said:
After much degenerate research, i can confirm it is indeed possible to penetrate the cervix, without causing pain. Not with a phallus mind you but still possible. If anyone is curious you may find such materials on xvideos. Be warned though, it is strong fetish material, blame not me for your own decisions. BTW you may also stumble upon urethral play.

Thank you oh wise one

micwhaley said:
After much degenerate research, i can confirm it is indeed possible to penetrate the cervix, without causing pain. Not with a phallus mind you but still possible. If anyone is curious you may find such materials on xvideos. Be warned though, it is strong fetish material, blame not me for your own decisions. BTW you may also stumble upon urethral play.

You have alerted the hoard of sounding, and they are asking for the sauce.

Funny thing to note, despite all these comments, none of you have pointed out that cervical penetration is something that regularly happens in some species of animal. Food for thought.

ow

Coming back to this lmao, the original comment said that cervical penetration is painful even when well-trained.

Now, let's see what they meant. By penetration, they clearly meant sexual penetration, not like the medical definition, so not like an IUD for example. And if they did mean like an IUD, then it clearly seems like that's not the case (and isn't even appropriate either) in this context; under this porn image and with that phrasing ("well-trained"), and they should have specified.

But the main thing they said was "painful even when well-trained"; implying that they've heard of an experience of cervical penetration in real life that was painful because otherwise the comment makes no sense whatsoever. You could imply that it's painful in universe (drawn porn in general) but the way it's phrased (especially with "well trained") implies that it's a real thing (drawings can't feel pain). Which it isn't. If they did mean in universe, they also should have specifed.