Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.
Dec 1st: If your account has been hit in the most recent ban wave of compromised accounts please reach out to us at management[at]e621.net and we'll help you get your account back.
If you've already contacted us give us a moment to get to you, though if it takes longer than a day for us to get back to you do feel free to reach out again!
Dec 2nd: If you got got and suddenly aren't able to see any of our exquisite selection of sausage and taco posts double check that Safe Mode is disabled in your account settings (Account -> Settings -> Safe mode [right above the blacklist text box]).
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!
You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.
Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.
cracky
Membermmm I'd hit that
vmc
MemberAmazing style!
pingpong101
MemberWhy would you hit her? Are you some kinda woman hater?
equimanthorn
MemberWanted as in I want her.
YinFox
Member[WANTED]
Reason: Apple Jacking your horse.
cracky
MemberIt mean hit as in I'd do her.... not actual hitting :P
pingpong101
MemberWhat do you mean you would "do her"? As in, do her a favor? Do you mean you would help her escape from the law or something?
cracky
Member.....-_- I WOULD DO HER: USE YOUR MIND AND WONDER ON WHAT DO MIGHT MEAN
pingpong101
MemberAh, how silly of me. You clearly are a beacon of law and order, and as such, you mean to do her in by having her arrested then hung like the criminal she is. I am sorry I was not getting what you were saying until now.
cracky
Memberyea what ever ya say
VanAshkevron
MemberObvious troll is obvious.
ikdind
MemberWell, to be fair, nobody gives a termite's crack what cracky will or won't hit. And not only did cracky not "get it", but he then insisted on clarifying that his comments were brrbrrdrrs in nature.
I agree with pingpong101's assessment (inferred though it may be) that such commentary isn't really necessary here, on a piece of artwork which, while containing an attractive female, doesn't actually have any nudity or sexual provocation beyond a little cleavage and midriff. To wit, I feel post #173446 and post #134376 are both more sexually provocative. They, too, are rated "Safe". And of course post #133091 is moreso than all of the above, but at least rates as "Questionable".
Genxral
Memberso much yes
Login to respond ยป