created by strega
Viewing sample resized to 75% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • SagaDarvulia said:
    What in the name of all that is holy am I looking at...?

    your computer screen.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • MagicalAnesthetist said:
    Yeah. No matter what freedom of thought bollocks you may believe in. This isn't sexy. If you find it to be so; seek help. No joking.

    Careful you don't offend someone! Offending someone is worse than murder.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • MagicalAnesthetist said:
    Yeah. No matter what freedom of thought bollocks you may believe in. This isn't sexy. If you find it to be so; seek help. No joking.

    No matter what freedom of thought bollocks you may believe in. Anthropomorphic animals are not sexy. If you find it to be so; seed help. no jokeing.

    Your argument, i think i just invalidated it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Ty_Starwin said:
    No matter what freedom of thought bollocks you may believe in. Anthropomorphic animals are not sexy. If you find it to be so; seed help. no jokeing.

    Your argument, i think i just invalidated it.

    There's a substantial difference between an anthropomorphic animal, and a baked looing one with a huge, lumpy groaning ballsack that's just burped. Do you see now? This isn't sexy.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • this is not "absorption vore" absorption is merging, fusing, or melting... basically any literal mixing with the predator not simply getting stuffed into some passage or holding space.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Ty_Starwin said:
    No matter what freedom of thought bollocks you may believe in. Anthropomorphic animals are not sexy. If you find it to be so; seed help. no jokeing.

    Your argument, i think i just invalidated it.

    I think hes talking about the penis with 1,000 balls. And not furry in general.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0