You can not view this image.

Parent: post #2139115 that has 3 siblings (learn more) show »

This post was deleted or flagged for the following reasons:

Description

Two Nuzzo pics in three days.
Hot damn.

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Why is this tagged as ambiguous_penetration?
    Seems like a pretty obvious penetration to me.
    Or is that a ghost dick that's casually flying by?
    If that's the case, ghost_dick should totally be a valid tag!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Fanttel said:
    Why is this tagged as ambiguous_penetration?
    Seems like a pretty obvious penetration to me.
    Or is that a ghost dick that's casually flying by?
    If that's the case, ghost_dick should totally be a valid tag!

    I agree! Then there would at least be a distinction between this (ghost_dick) and internal with a cutaway

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Fanttel said:
    Why is this tagged as ambiguous_penetration?
    Seems like a pretty obvious penetration to me.
    Or is that a ghost dick that's casually flying by?
    If that's the case, ghost_dick should totally be a valid tag!

    Ambiguous because you can't directly tell if it's in her ass or her vagina. The penetration isn't ambiguous, the entry point is.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Qaus said:
    Ambiguous because you can't directly tell if it's in her ass or her vagina. The penetration isn't ambiguous, the entry point is.

    But then that's countered with where the penis is located at in the cutaway, and since it's more angled towards the stomach, it's vaginal whereas if it was angled up more towards the back and the cutaway would start up closer to the tail, then it would be anal.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0