mythology and etc created by denchi nezumi
Description

好き好き言ってるわりに描かないレックウザ。6月ぐらいに描いた物です。今年は花嫁ネタ結構描けて楽しかったです。　右奥の布の構造は自分でもよくわかりません；どうしてこうなった・・？◆ルーキーランク入りありがとうございました！たくさんの方にレックウザを見てもらえて幸せ！！◆優しくて強くて可愛くて美しいレックウザと結婚したいです。

Blacklisted
(help)
  • Comments
    •
    Show all comments

    Darkscale

    Member

    what.

    ChristopherWolf said:
    Are you male, because I don't recall same sex marriage being allowed in poke'world.

    Dont recall it being not.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •

    Narji

    Member

    enlightenment said:
    Fuck yes! (only if it's male).

    Can't be a male, since that is a Bride's headdress she has on her. And as far as I know males aren't allowed to wear them unless they are transvestites XD

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
    •

    Greyfus

    Member

    TJZX24 said:
    Rayquaza is sexless

    The way I see it, most legends are considered genderless because researchers never see them procreate and have never (or rarely ever) been able to study one. Latis have genders because (at least in the anime) they do procreate, and researchers have most likely been able to fully study Heatran.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
    •

    Athony15

    Member

    Where another have male with rayquaza?
    Ya these have miss rayquaza male.
    Well look have pretty with female rayquaza nice! ;)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •

    AithTheImp

    Member

    Well, the way I look at this is that Rayquaza is implied of being a female, at least in this picture. However, legendary pokemon are referred to as being genderless because not enough is known about most of them to correctly assume their correct gender. additionally, some pokemon researchers likely don't even believe that certain legendary pokemon exist, thus why they are referred to as "legendary". If I remember correctly, in Pokemon Gen. 1, Mew was mentioned as thought to not actually exist to most researchers, as just being a mirage, or something like that. I myself do believe that all legendary pokemon do in fact have a definite gender. After all, they had to come from somewhere, and unless they all reproduce asexually (which I find hard to believe that anything much larger than a single-celled organism, much less a large group of them), they must have a gender. Of course, I wouldn't mind Rayquaza being a female as he/she had been one of my favorite pokemon back a few years ago.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
    •

    anonymousih

    Member

    MessengerOfDarkness said:
    Well, the way I look at this is that Rayquaza is implied of being a female, at least in this picture. However, legendary pokemon are referred to as being genderless because not enough is known about most of them to correctly assume their correct gender. additionally, some pokemon researchers likely don't even believe that certain legendary pokemon exist, thus why they are referred to as "legendary". If I remember correctly, in Pokemon Gen. 1, Mew was mentioned as thought to not actually exist to most researchers, as just being a mirage, or something like that. I myself do believe that all legendary pokemon do in fact have a definite gender. After all, they had to come from somewhere, and unless they all reproduce asexually (which I find hard to believe that anything much larger than a single-celled organism, much less a large group of them), they must have a gender. Of course, I wouldn't mind Rayquaza being a female as he/she had been one of my favorite pokemon back a few years ago.

    Nice thinking, though small clarification: there are some creatures alive, plant and animals, that can reproduce asexually while being much more than a single cell, some can even use both asexual and sexual reproduction http://www.jogtheweb.com/run/DmucGQr30a5E/Asexual-and-Sexual-Reproduction#3 http://www.jogtheweb.com/flat/DmucGQr30a5E/Asexual-and-Sexual-Reproduction Some Jellyfish and Whiptail Lizards are an example of dual-users.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
    •