a little young to be getting married! Does father know?!

fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

enlightenment said:
Fuck yes! (only if it's male).

You, stop that.

This was... unexpected.

enlightenment said:
Fuck yes! (only if it's male).

Are you male, because I don't recall same sex marriage being allowed in poke'world.

what.

ChristopherWolf said:
Are you male, because I don't recall same sex marriage being allowed in poke'world.

Dont recall it being not.

But i'm to young to get married D:

enlightenment said:
Fuck yes! (only if it's male).

Can't be a male, since that is a Bride's headdress she has on her. And as far as I know males aren't allowed to wear them unless they are transvestites XD

Rayquaza is sexless

TJZX24 said:
Rayquaza is sexless

yea... u keep thinking that.

TJZX24 said:
Rayquaza is sexless

The way I see it, most legends are considered genderless because researchers never see them procreate and have never (or rarely ever) been able to study one. Latis have genders because (at least in the anime) they do procreate, and researchers have most likely been able to fully study Heatran.

I wonder who the lucky groom is...

.....we better have a good honeymoon

Where another have male with rayquaza?
Ya these have miss rayquaza male.
Well look have pretty with female rayquaza nice! ;)

Well, the way I look at this is that Rayquaza is implied of being a female, at least in this picture. However, legendary pokemon are referred to as being genderless because not enough is known about most of them to correctly assume their correct gender. additionally, some pokemon researchers likely don't even believe that certain legendary pokemon exist, thus why they are referred to as "legendary". If I remember correctly, in Pokemon Gen. 1, Mew was mentioned as thought to not actually exist to most researchers, as just being a mirage, or something like that. I myself do believe that all legendary pokemon do in fact have a definite gender. After all, they had to come from somewhere, and unless they all reproduce asexually (which I find hard to believe that anything much larger than a single-celled organism, much less a large group of them), they must have a gender. Of course, I wouldn't mind Rayquaza being a female as he/she had been one of my favorite pokemon back a few years ago.

Super Mario logic? Are we standing on clouds to view this wedding? XP

MessengerOfDarkness said:
Well, the way I look at this is that Rayquaza is implied of being a female, at least in this picture. However, legendary pokemon are referred to as being genderless because not enough is known about most of them to correctly assume their correct gender. additionally, some pokemon researchers likely don't even believe that certain legendary pokemon exist, thus why they are referred to as "legendary". If I remember correctly, in Pokemon Gen. 1, Mew was mentioned as thought to not actually exist to most researchers, as just being a mirage, or something like that. I myself do believe that all legendary pokemon do in fact have a definite gender. After all, they had to come from somewhere, and unless they all reproduce asexually (which I find hard to believe that anything much larger than a single-celled organism, much less a large group of them), they must have a gender. Of course, I wouldn't mind Rayquaza being a female as he/she had been one of my favorite pokemon back a few years ago.

Nice thinking, though small clarification: there are some creatures alive, plant and animals, that can reproduce asexually while being much more than a single cell, some can even use both asexual and sexual reproduction http://www.jogtheweb.com/run/DmucGQr30a5E/Asexual-and-Sexual-Reproduction#3 http://www.jogtheweb.com/flat/DmucGQr30a5E/Asexual-and-Sexual-Reproduction Some Jellyfish and Whiptail Lizards are an example of dual-users.

Wait, how did I get to this point?

I can think of worse things to do in life than marry Rayquaza.

Would you take this man to be your lawfully wedded husband?
*Rayquaza screeching noises