You can not view this image.

Parent: post #1340614 (learn more) show »

This post was deleted or flagged for the following reasons:

Description

Actually uncensored version of that lewd Jackal we've all seen but never uncensored. At least in the case of this particular piece. There seems to be a little bit of artifacting, but it should look better when not stretched out massively.

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Whoa, where did you find this one? :O

    This can't be the edit I just requested (right?), it's got a different coloring job and retains the dithering of the greyscale version.

    Anyhow, damn awesome! Thanks.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Jugofthat said:
    Whoa, where did you find this one? :O

    This can't be the edit I just requested (right?), it's got a different coloring job and retains the dithering of the greyscale version.

    Anyhow, damn awesome! Thanks.

    I did this edit myself a while back. Just now realized I should post it upon only seeing annoyingly censored ones.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Rushurum said:
    I did this edit myself a while back. Just now realized I should post it upon only seeing annoyingly censored ones.

    Shi-iiit! In that case, job well done and many thanks for being willing to share. I've been on the lookout for something like this ever since I saw the original years ago.

    I have now attained inner peace.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Only problem I am seeing is why it seems like it's first downscaled from original post, then colored and uncensored and then upscaled back to original resolution?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Mario69 said:
    Only problem I am seeing is why it seems like it's first downscaled from original post, then colored and uncensored and then upscaled back to original resolution?

    I noticed it looks like that, yeah. I don't know what the culprit is, because I opened the raw file from the original into Photoshop and exported it as a lossless PNG at the same resolution. I don't know if Photoshop screwed with it, but I'm assuming it must have.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0