Had an incredibly informative sit-down
with the Extremely helpful Dood @Millcore
Lightly going over Bulge detail, When questionable
becomes explicit and all that lovely jazz a while back ago.
It was super helpful and would love to thank the dood
again for the feedback! ◠‿◠)~!

Though recently it's been getting pretty hard telling
whether it belongs in Questionable or explicit;
The area's getting grayer than Zatch's Coat
or blurrier than a dood's vision without Their glasses.
= =)

The Advice Given

If you could see all the biz "The D&B's" very
clearly than it's explicit, Dood. Like these Doodles:

post #2090626 | post #2076580 | post #2084145
_________________________________________________

Also, Context Is Important Too!

If the doodle draws attention to the Briefs than it's
explicit even if the briefs themselves are lighter on detail, Dood.
Like these Doodles:

post #2078909 | post #2073434
_________________________________________________

Though Recently,

Doodles have found another noch.
Detailed briefs but not overly detail on top of not being
"outwardly" overt too, Dood! Like these Doodles:

post #2087877 | post #2096905 | post #2087876

-There's definitely a bulge but not overly detail.

- It's definitely not the star of the doodle but,

It does call some attention.

- And all these doodles have SFW themes but an

unsaid NSFW'sh undertone like questionable

and Explicit doodles have.

I'm stumped on these, Doods, and may just get
something record too for unintentionally miss-tagging.
What are your peeps thoughts? Would the lower tier
count as questionable or would it all be explicit?

How would you define the line between
Questionable and Explicit?

From the examples you have given (and from my observations), it seems like bulges become explicit when you can see details such as the head, veins, or the separation between the balls. If you can't tell where the head is or where the individual testicles are, chances are it will be tagged questionable.

Invertadox said:
From the examples you have given (and from my observations), it seems like bulges become explicit when you can see details such as the head, veins, or the separation between the balls. If you can't tell where the head is or where the individual testicles are, chances are it will be tagged questionable.

That'd be kinda odd, Dood.
Not saying you could be wrong, I really appreciate the feedback and
my just roll with that point to avoid getting in trouble, haha ◠‿◠)
Just in that in that case-

post #2096905
This Would be: Explicit

post #2087876
And this Would Be: Questionable.

And a passing peep could see it as the other way around
and miss-tagging shinanigans insue. It's really strange
dood; It feels 'Explicit' and 'Questionable' at the same time.
Like it works as both but neither alone.

Well as long as you can explain why you tagged something a cirtain way, and as long as the explanation doesn't go against the uploading guidelines, posts in that rating grey area could be tagged either way. Worst case scenario, it gets edited by a mod. Maybe a new rating category could be added between questionable and explicit ;)

Invertadox said:
Well as long as you can explain why you tagged something a cirtain way, and as long as the explanation doesn't go against the uploading guidelines, posts in that rating grey area could be tagged either way. Worst case scenario, it gets edited by a mod. Maybe a new rating category could be added between questionable and explicit ;)

Good point, Dood! ╹‿╹)
'Just hope they give me a chance to explain before
making the judgment call on the record thing lolz
=‿=)

And Yeah, That Four category would be "Ya Cutting It Close!"