Implicating lamia → snake
Link to implication

Reason:

naga is a snake :P

h4x0r said:
Implicating lamia → snake
Link to implication

Reason:

naga is a snake :P

***lamia***

we do not imply centaurs to horses, why we would imply this to snake?

Mutisija said:
we do not imply centaurs to horses, why we would imply this to snake?

centaur is horse and human based
lamia is snake and human based

h4x0r said:
centaur is horse and human based
lamia is snake and human based

okay let me say this really clearly:
centaur does NOT imply horse.
why should lamia imply snake?

Mutisija said:
okay let me say this really clearly:
centaur does NOT imply horse.
why should lamia imply snake?

for the watch ! (g.o.t. reference)

h4x0r said:
for the watch

If it's for a watch, then just set your watch to include it. ~lamia ~snake ~naga add extra tags as wanted.

Mutisija said:
okay let me say this really clearly:
centaur does NOT imply horse.
why should lamia imply snake?

Lamias and nagas confuse me more than anything else here tagging-wise, but do you think an implication to scalie would work?

parasprite said:
Lamias and nagas confuse me more than anything else here tagging-wise, but do you think an implication to scalie would work?

naga is a snake with arms
and lamia is a half snake half human

h4x0r said:
naga is a snake with arms
and lamia is a half snake half human

I now see how the various semi-anthroish naga-lamia snake things on here would confuse the definitions a lot. Thanks for the simple explanation. :)