How are we defining prostitute? When it's obvious in the image that money is exchanging hands? Anyone being a slut for cawk or whatever?
Updated by SnowWolf
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
How are we defining prostitute? When it's obvious in the image that money is exchanging hands? Anyone being a slut for cawk or whatever?
Updated by SnowWolf
123easy said:
How are we defining prostitute? When it's obvious in the image that money is exchanging hands? Anyone being a slut for cawk or whatever?
Well the literal term of prostitution is "Selling ones body for money" However, that said, their is a certain "Garb' Prostitutes tend to wear.
Updated by anonymous
The Street-Walker's Uniform, aye. Thus why the query. Is prostitute only going to be used for the actual service for sex, or just wearing clothes that is usually (but not always) worn in that profession.
Updated by anonymous
123easy said:
The Street-Walker's Uniform, aye. Thus why the query. Is prostitute only going to be used for the actual service for sex, or just wearing clothes that is usually (but not always) worn in that profession.
I would imagine it would be shown "primarily" In the exchanging of money for sex, or implied prostitution.
Updated by anonymous
"would this post interest someone who is interesting in looking at pictures of hookers?" if yes, tag it. if not, then don't.
money exchange is a key, words are a key, outfit is a key.. .standing on a streetcorner.. etc. :)
it can be awkward to fit a money exchange into a single still image.
Updated by anonymous
Well, post #129068 post #80870 post #114113 and post #94602 (*shudder*) all shout out prostitute to me, but post #18307 post #47355 and post #102121 all don't (though the first two do have the slut part down).
As for the "would this interest someone who wants hooker pictures?" line- Then we need to add it to a lot more pictures, like all the cumdumpsters and sluts who bang for free, since those would interest someone wanting a hooker just as much. :P
Updated by anonymous
post #102121 is a prostitute .. .it's "proven" in the other pages of the comic uploaded on the site. the others I agree with though.
123easy said:As for the "would this interest someone who wants hooker pictures?" line- Then we need to add it to a lot more pictures, like all the cumdumpsters and sluts who bang for free, since those would interest someone wanting a hooker just as much. :P
naw.. you're missing the point of the "kink"... some people get off on the concept of "I paid money to fuck this girl." So, to mean, if they're dressed like a "skunk" standing on the street corner, looking around, even if they're not exchanging money, they'd count. but not janefur just standing there on a purple BG with no 'context' outside of fishnet outfit.
Updated by anonymous
No, I completely understand the kink. Thus why the ":P" at the end, to show that it was a joke or jibe.
As for post #102121 - Perhaps, but there's no evidence directly in that picture of it. Shouldn't TWYS stand here, or are we falling back to BV as I quoted in the other thread?
Updated by anonymous
I belive, generally speaking, for comics, we prefer to take the whole continuity into account... though I"m honestly not sure that that picture should have prostitute on it, no... that should be more towards genders and such.
Updated by anonymous