If you type in penis -balls, you see lots of balls all over the place. I have tagged 368 times in the last few hours "I used my calculator" so I'm exhausted but I feel that we must push forwards to keep this site clean so I'll appreciate any help I get.

It's actually a really big deal that typing in -balls doesn't work AT ALL so just letting everyone know, this is more than I can do alone.

xxxFurryFanxxx

People always forget to tag basic stuff like that for some unknown reason.

That's a search I've used too. I've done some cleanup runs on it as well. It's a big task because the balls tag ought to be on so many of the sites images. If even a tiny fraction of them are missed, it still adds up to a lot of images to go through.

31h253 said:
That's a search I've used too. I've done some cleanup runs on it as well. It's a big task because the balls tag ought to be on so many of the sites images. If even a tiny fraction of them are missed, it still adds up to a lot of images to go through.

For reals, there are SO many mistagged, it would actually be easier to link penis and balls together and then edit it from there because there are WAY more pictures where the penis & balls are together but not tagged as so then either one or the other being in the picture.

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
For reals, there are SO many mistagged, it would actually be easier to link penis and balls together and then edit it from there because there are WAY more pictures where the penis & balls are together but not tagged as so then either one or the other being in the picture.

The problem with having one implicate the other is that you wouldn't be able to make exceptions, because if, as an example, penis implicated balls and there was an image with a penis that lacked balls, whenever you tried to remove the balls tag the system would just put it back.

Raiden_Gekkou said:
People always forget to tag basic stuff like that for some unknown reason.

Mario583 Riversyde 6 months ago Please add genders to your posts.

Test-Subject_217601 said:
The problem with having one implicate the other is that you wouldn't be able to make exceptions, because if, as an example, penis implicated balls and there was an image with a penis that lacked balls, whenever you tried to remove the balls tag the system would just put it back.

Oh, I thought you could implicate it and then delete it later. I guess it's just up to people to do it manually then.

Who ever heard of a penis without balls?
-neuter -castration

also, to make you squirm, Early on in Korea, castration consisted of daubing a boy's genitals with human feces and having a dog bite them off. :)

Mario583 said:
Who ever heard of a penis without balls?
-neuter -castration

also, to make you squirm, Early on in Korea, castration consisted of daubing a boy's genitals with human feces and having a dog bite them off.

Why poop? Wouldn't butter be more sanitary?

Raiden_Gekkou said:
Why poop? Wouldn't butter be more sanitary?

Dogs eat their poop.

Along the same lines, don't forget about nipples! And don't forget males can have them too...

Mario583 said:
Who ever heard of a penis without balls?
-neuter -castration

No, it means that the balls aren't shown OR they don't have balls like in reptile and amphibian pictures or "aquatic mammals" where you see one
or multiple penises coming out of their slits. It can be very hot!

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
No, it means that the balls aren't shown OR they don't have balls like in reptile and amphibian pictures or "aquatic mammals" where you see one
or multiple penises coming out of their slits. It can be very hot!

Or for the note, floating anon-dicks.