Topic: Tag Implication: mouse/rat/rodent -> mammal

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Peekaboo said:
I'm pretty sure I added it to the long list of mammal "candidates" I did ages ago, they prob just haven't got to it yet.

are you sure? I feel like i've already seen it be implicated... werid... @.=.@

Updated by anonymous

TheHuskyK9 said:
I'm really not a big fan of the mammal tag. It seems like it's too vague of a tag

do you mean like all the subspecies like canine, equine, cervine, caprine, feline ect. ect. are lumped in altogether is that what you are getting at?

Updated by anonymous

Mammal tag is not only vague, I think, but I've also seen countless discussions over nearly a decade about 'why does this <lizardgirl subtype> have breasts?'. That would play hell with the tagging system for some folks.

Updated by anonymous

TheHuskyK9 said:
I'm really not a big fan of the mammal tag. It seems like it's too vague of a tag

Me too. But since it's there I expect it to be properly used at least xD

Updated by anonymous

Theclarinetist said:
do you mean like all the subspecies like canine, equine, cervine, caprine, feline ect. ect. are lumped in altogether is that what you are getting at?

At least if I put equine I know I'm going to find some (big throbbing and veiny?) horsecock.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar

Former Staff

TheHuskyK9 said:
I'm really not a big fan of the mammal tag. It seems like it's too vague of a tag

It's no more vague than scalie or avian, and pretty handy when tag scripting several things. Such as interspecies.

Anyway, rodent has been implicated to mammal for a long while now, so this topic is a bit redundant.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar said:
Anyway, rodent has been implicated to mammal for a long while now, so this topic is a bit redundant.

I have found some post tagged with mouse and rodent which didn't have mammal tagged.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar

Former Staff

NotAPervert said:
I have found some post tagged with mouse and rodent which didn't have mammal tagged.

Yep, that's how implications work. New ones get added automatically, but the old ones need to be edited manually.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar said:
Yep, that's how implications work. New ones get added automatically, but the old ones need to be edited manually.

Then I better get to work x3

Updated by anonymous

  • 1