Should penis/erection/cum/pussy_juice = rating:e?

Sofi said:
Should penis/erection/cum/pussy_juice = rating:e?

First, this would call for an implication. Second, I'm not sure if implicating metatags is actually possible.

EsalRider said:
First, this would call for an implication. Second, I'm not sure if implicating metatags is actually possible.

As The Heavy says: "Is not possible!"

And these tags warrant an automatic "Explicit" rating anyway... just don't be lazy to tick the "Explicit" setting :I

Sofi said:
Should penis/erection/cum/pussy_juice = rating:e?

In theory. At least that's what some of the wiki definitions say.
I've actually been cleaning them up (one of my too many projects), but there are a lot of ambiguous ones.

Such as these:
post #282838 post #411267 post #274691

Maybe we need a new tag for those. Ambiguous_substance and suggestive instead of cum?

Genjar said:
In theory. At least that's what some of the wiki definitions say.
I've actually been cleaning them up (one of my too many projects), but there are a lot of ambiguous ones.

Such as these:
post #282838 post #411267 post #274691

Maybe we need a new tag for those. Ambiguous_substance and suggestive instead of cum?

Implied_tree