Implicating afghan_hound → dog
Link to implication
Implicating labrador → dog
Link to implication
Implicating sheepdog → dog
Link to implication
Reason:
they're dogs
Updated by 123easy
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating afghan_hound → dog
Link to implication
Implicating labrador → dog
Link to implication
Implicating sheepdog → dog
Link to implication
they're dogs
Updated by 123easy
agreed, waiting on more weighing in by users
Updated by anonymous
Don't see any reason why not.
Updated by anonymous
They're all species of dogs.
Updated by anonymous
Yes
Updated by anonymous
Shouldn't it be labrador_retriever?
Updated by anonymous
Halite said:
Shouldn't it be labrador_retriever?
I would've thought so too, but nothing seems to be tagged that. I assumed there was a reason and just proposed an implication anyway.
Updated by anonymous
Seven_Twenty said:
I would've thought so too, but nothing seems to be tagged that. I assumed there was a reason and just proposed an implication anyway.
It's tagged that way because I can't spell retir...retreev.....retr....ALIASED TO LABRADOR
Updated by anonymous
They're also very commonly referred to as just 'labradors', rather than their full name, 'labrador retriever'; in this they differ from such breeds as the golden retriever.
Updated by anonymous
123easy said:
They're also very commonly referred to as just 'labradors', rather than their full name, 'labrador retriever'; in this they differ from such breeds as the golden retriever.
Not really, I've heard people call golden retrievers "goldens".
It's stupid imo, but people do it.
Updated by anonymous
Halite said:
Not really, I've heard people call golden retrievers "goldens".
It's stupid imo, but people do it.
Just because some idiots do it doesn't mean it's commonly done.
Updated by anonymous