Implicating seviper → pokémon
Link to implication
Reason:
Updated by Rainbow Dash
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating seviper → pokémon
Link to implication
Updated by Rainbow Dash
Not always a pokemon
Updated by anonymous
How can be a Pokémon not always a Pokémon? Even if drawn as an anthro or as an hybrid it would be still a Pokémon
If this is wrong, then there are four pages of incorrect tag implications: https://e621.net/tag_implication?implied_to=pok%C3%A9mon
Updated by anonymous
A human wearing a Seviper costume even qualifies, since it's representative of Pokemon. This implication should go through. o.O
Updated by anonymous
Some of those are going to need to be deleted then
Updated by anonymous
Lizardite said:
If this is wrong, then there are four pages of incorrect tag implications: https://e621.net/tag_implication?implied_to=pok%C3%A9mon
Rainbow_Dash said:
Some of those are going to need to be deleted then
Are you going to remove implications from fim characters too? They can be humanized and all other thing can be done to them as well. Same goes for all other franchises.
Updated by anonymous
I think this should go through. Even if a pokémon weren't always a pokémon, pokémon is a copyright tag on this site. For everything related to the franchise, not necessarily only the pokémons themselves.
Updated by anonymous
Lizardite said:
How can be a Pokémon not always a Pokémon? Even if drawn as an anthro or as an hybrid it would be still a Pokémon
Yeah, I don't see the problem either.
Well... except for the hybrids, maybe. Since those tend to fall under Fakemon instead.
Updated by anonymous
Wyvrn said:
I think this should go through. Even if a pokémon weren't always a pokémon, pokémon is a copyright tag on this site. For everything related to the franchise, not necessarily only the pokémons themselves.
This. this is what I'm saying.
It's not a species tag, it's a Copyright tag. I don't see why this was confused?
Updated by anonymous
I... I think RD was joking.
Updated by anonymous
Ah yes, let's treat it like a copyright tag to be applied and not a literal species tag and we should be fine
Updated by anonymous
isnt that what we've been doing?
Updated by anonymous
ippiki_ookami said:
isnt that what we've been doing?
Yeah, sorry, got confused by pokemon being a species tag and for some reason thought that extended to the pokemon tag being a species as well
Updated by anonymous