Topic: EmBURrassed nude furries

The bulk update request #12966 is pending approval.

Reason: Cleaning up in prep for the following script to be run:

alias embarased_nude_female -> embarrassing_nudity
alias embarassed_nude_anthro -> embarrassing_nudity
alias embarassed_nude_female -> embarrassing_nudity
alias embarassed_nude_male -> embarrassing_nudity
alias embarrased_nude_female -> embarrassing_nudity
alias embarrased_nude_male -> embarrassing_nudity
alias embarrassed_nude_andromorph -> embarrassing_nudity
alias embarrassed_nude_anthro -> embarrassing_nudity
alias embarrassed_nude_exposure -> embarrassing_nudity
alias embarrassed_nude_female -> embarrassing_nudity
alias embarrassed_nude_gynomorph -> embarrassing_nudity
alias embarrassed_nude_herm -> embarrassing_nudity
alias embarrassed_nude_male -> embarrassing_nudity
alias embarrassed_nude_maleherm -> embarrassing_nudity
alias enf -> embarrassing_nudity
alias enm -> embarrassing_nudity

None of those implications exist, and all of these are very intentionally aliased away because we don't need triple combination tags like this

Did you mean to re-alias these tags instead of re-implying them?

I certainly did. Fixed now. Gee, I sure wish BURs would just throw an error and fail to post if they detect issues like "trying to remove an implication that doesn't exist".

errorist said:
I certainly did. Fixed now. Gee, I sure wish BURs would just throw an error and fail to post if they detect issues like "trying to remove an implication that doesn't exist".

you can report them on “site bugs report and feature request”

whatismyname1234 said:
you can report them on “site bugs report and feature request”

It isn't a bug and really the less that makes BUR creation fail the better (to a point obviously)