The bulk update request #12929 is pending approval.
create implication acanthuriform (1) -> fish (98298)
create alias acanthuriformes (1) -> acanthuriform (1)
remove implication acanthurid (129) -> fish (98298)
create implication acanthurid (129) -> acanthuriform (1)
create implication achilles_tang (1) -> acanthurid (129)
create implication powder_blue_tang (10) -> acanthurid (129)
create implication purple_tang (1) -> acanthurid (129)
create implication yellow_tang (21) -> acanthurid (129)
remove alias unicornfish (0) -> acanthurid (129)
remove alias unicorn_fish (0) -> acanthurid (129)
remove alias naso_(fish) (0) -> acanthurid (129)
create implication angelfish (80) -> acanthuriform (1)
create implication bicolor_angelfish (1) -> angelfish (80)
create implication bluering_angelfish (1) -> angelfish (80)
create implication emperor_angelfish (3) -> angelfish (80)
create implication flame_angelfish (3) -> angelfish (80)
create implication lemonpeel_angelfish (2) -> angelfish (80)
create implication royal_angelfish (1) -> angelfish (80)
create implication lutjanid (0) -> acanthuriform (1)
create implication snapper_(fish) (7) -> lutjanid (0)
create implication fusilier_(fish) (1) -> lutjanid (0)
create implication moorish_idol (73) -> acanthuriform (1)
create implication rabbitfish (5) -> acanthuriform (1)
create implication foxface_rabbitfish (5) -> rabbitfish (5)
create implication tilefish (1) -> acanthuriform (1)
Reason: Followup:
imply unicornfish -> acanthurid alias unicorn_fish -> unicornfish alias naso_(fish) -> unicornfish
Building up a tree for Acanthuriform fish.
For the Acanthurids I think leaving surgeonfish and tang_(fish) aliased to acanthurid is fine since there's no real distinction and even individual species are called both interchangeably. However, the unicornfishes are a distinct clade with a distinct appearance (and one post #4060102) so I think they ought to be separated out.