Topic: Start of My Second Opinion thread / Rating Review

Posted under General

Since I don't want to earn another "infraction" I'm going to be using this thread as a gauge of what rating I should put on artwork just in case...

And I'll start with something simple and use the artwork below as a example (sadly I haven't figured out how to get it too show, so I'll provide the link)

https://e621.net/posts/6038592

I'm thinking safe but I do think that this version of "The Withered Bonnie" can be considered suggestive/questionable?

He looks kinda like what I could best describe as "Beefcake" I think, I'm leaning on safe despite the suggestiveness but like I said that's just a example of what I'll use this thread for

Updated

wateryblue said:
And I'll start with something simple and use the artwork below as a example (sadly I haven't figured out how to get it too show, so I'll provide the link)

Just use the following code:

thumb #

followed by the post ID of the post you want to thumbnail. For example,

thumb #6038592

would net you
post #6038592

I'm thinking safe but I do think that this version of "The Withered Bonnie" can be considered suggestive/questionable?

Beefcake isn't inherently suggestive. He's just standing there, holding a gift. There's nothing suggestive going on. It's definitely Safe to me.

wateryblue said:
I think this is considered "Safe" Rather than "Questionable"... So I changed it, Remember if you disagree feel free to change it

post #4923683
This is also Safe to me. She's just comically acting like a cat.

Maybe read the message written on your record or e621:Ratings? It can't be that hard to follow.

Let's put it this way:

  • "Safe" posts are those that you could potentially show to your friends and family without raising an eyebrow.
  • "Questionable" posts are those that seem a little suggestive and may not be appropriate to display out in public, but also not severe enough that it would land you in trouble.
  • "Explicit" posts will get you into trouble if you displayed it in public, or at the very least, get you a lot of side-eye.

wateryblue said:
https://e621.net/posts/6038592

I'm thinking safe but I do think that this version of "The Withered Bonnie" can be considered suggestive/questionable?

He looks kinda like what I could best describe as "Beefcake" I think, I'm leaning on safe despite the suggestiveness but like I said that's just a example of what I'll use this thread for

This is Safe. Someone can be a beefcake in public without making people uncomfortable.
It could also be argued that this is not fetishistic in any way.

wateryblue said:
I think this is considered "Safe" Rather than "Questionable"... So I changed it, Remember if you disagree feel free to change it

https://e621.net/posts/4923683?q=tallinax

This one lands closer to Questionable for me, but Safe is also fine.
Going out in public with a similar attire/appearance could get you a few raised eyebrows.

Technically speaking, this does falls into Safe-levels of "cartoon nudity" or "non-suggestive artwork containing characters in underwear or swimwear."
However, this may also fall into Questionable-levels of "characters wearing revealing clothing with obvious erotic or teasing intent" due to the amount of exposed skin and full_cleavage.

Original page: https://e621.net/forum_topics/60887?page=1