The bulk update request #12639 is pending approval.
create implication armor_(mh) (1) -> monster_hunter (20137)
create implication rathalos_armor (141) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication zinogre_armor (25) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication nargacuga_armor (83) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication anjanath_armor (28) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication rathian_armor (15) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication odogaron_armor (22) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication kirin_armor (152) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication wroggi_armor (13) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication kulve_taroth_armor (21) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication mizutsune_armor (9) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication legiana_armor (8) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication agnaktor_armor (6) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication tobi-kadachi_armor (15) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication kamura_armor (365) -> armor_(mh) (1)
create implication wiggler_head (26) -> armor_(mh) (1)
Reason: After I saw the tagging for armor of monsters was all over the place, I took some time and tried to tag the most popular ones correctly.
Now, I feel like there should be a tag to group all of them.
Please give me feedback if armor_(mh) fits, or if armor_(monster_hunter) would be the better choice. I went with armor_(mh), to stay consistent with other tags like kirin_(mh) or leviathan_(mh).
Another point that should be discussed: Should armor_(mh) imply armor?
I've got a huge backlog of posts where I couldn't identify the armor in the image, if anyone wanna help, feel free to message me.
Updated