Topic: describing_genitalia implications

The bulk update request #12597 is pending approval.

create implication describing_balls (88) -> describing_genitalia (768)
create implication describing_cloaca (0) -> describing_genitalia (768)
create implication describing_penis (804) -> describing_genitalia (768)
create implication describing_pussy (220) -> describing_genitalia (768)
create implication describing_sheath (0) -> describing_genitalia (768)

Reason: Looking at the describing_* tags under the 'categories' header on the wiki page for describing_genitalia, should these tags implicate describing_genitalia?

These sound like they should be invalidated for being too vague and generic. describing_penis can be applied to anything from a character saying "warm..." or a character described as "magnum donged waifu", to a character describing "my cock? my massive fucking schlonger? my gigantic bulgy wulgy? you mean my long meaty donger? (etc.)...". Basically any time genitalia is referenced in dialog, it seems these tags apply.

Looking at a post like this, with the simple line "I miss your hunter-cock so much..", it gets describing another, describing genitalia, describing penis, and describing penis type. This seems rather excessive tagging to me.