Topic: genital_slit_balls implications

Member

create implication genital_slit_balls (93) -> genital_slit (39616)
create implication genital_slit_balls (93) -> balls (1256963)

Reason: Since the tag indicates both features are present, it also indicates both of them separately.

Privileged

I do not believe this should be a valid tag, but I will see if others are willing to keep it around.