Topic: [BUR] Proposing a "humanoid_anatomy" umbrella tag

The bulk update request #12488 is pending approval.

create implication humanoid_feet (67025) -> humanoid_anatomy (0)
create implication humanoid_hands (123898) -> humanoid_anatomy (0)
create implication humanoid_genitalia (597908) -> humanoid_anatomy (0)

Reason: A while back I discovered the humanoid_structure tag and raised it for discussion. Reactions were mixed, but I think it does have potential use as an umbrella tag, so I'd like to put it to a formal vote. I'm changing the name to "humanoid anatomy" because that makes the meaning clearer.

(plantigrade and the various non-mammal_* tags are excluded because those features are not unique to humans, though there may also be value in an umbrella tag for non-mammal_*.)

I think this is way too vague and generic to be any actual practical use.

ruppari said:
I think this is way too vague and generic to be any actual practical use.

I don't see how it's any moreso than the other humanoid_* tags.

beholding said:
I don't see how it's any moreso than the other humanoid_* tags.

All the other humanoid_* tags point to a specific body part, that could be searched if the user desires.

Meanwhile, a humanoid_anatomy tag is extremely vague (i.e., could mean body type, limbs, etc.), needless as an umbrella tag, and opens up opportunities for misuse (i.e., simply being mistaken as an alternative for humanoid).

I'm not convinced it's needless as an umbrella tag. I can see users wanting to filter it out, and filtering all the humanoid anatomy tags individually is a hassle.

The confusion with humanoid is a fair point, but there's been discussion about needing to rename that tag for a while now.

humanoid_anatomy sounds too vague, and could apply to anything that appears somewhat human-like.
post #5928782
looks like "humanoid anatomy" (and was erroneously tagged wolf_humanoid). humanoid_hands in particular seem quite ubiquitous, almost pointless to tag
post #5930020 post #5926118
making humanoid_anatomy pointless by implication (at least humanoid_feet is somewhat reasonable, as digitigrade paw-like feet are more common to see on anthros, unlike hands which keep a more human-like shape with five fingers and opposable thumbs much more often). When would an anthro (or humanoid) not have humanoid anatomy, and when would a non-anthro/non-human(oid) have humanoid anatomy?

I've also seen people trying to tag canine_anatomy, an equally vague tag that seems to be equivalent to just tagging canine or canine_genitalia. How far would this go?

watsit said:
humanoid_hands in particular seem quite ubiquitous, almost pointless to tag

Do you suggest deprecating 5_fingers and 5_toes as well, then?

When would an anthro (or humanoid) not have humanoid anatomy

anthro ~4_fingers ~3_fingers ~2_fingers

post #5930777 post #5930874 post #5930796 post #5927715

It took me like 2 minutes to find these. Drawing hands with a paw-like structure rather than humanoid is, in fact, a thing people do. Please make the slightest attempt to search for something before declaring it nonexistent.

beholding said:
Do you suggest deprecating 5_fingers and 5_toes as well, then?

I think fictional artwork has enough variation in finger/toe count to make them relevant tags, unlike two_eyes or one_tail.

beholding said:
anthro ~4_fingers ~3_fingers ~2_fingers

post #5930777 post #5930874 post #5930796 post #5927715

Note that the tag is humanoid hands. Human-like, not strictly human. Hands can be human-like with 4 or less fingers, as long as the shape and articulation is roughly human-like, which I'd argue the first and third examples are. Just like a humanoid_penis doesn't need a visible glans and urethra or be covered in skin to count, as long as it fits the general shape. Something like handpaws would be non-humanoid hands, which I can see fitting the second and fourth example, but those are the outlier, something different worth tagging, rather than the norm that applies to the majority of anthros and humanoids.

watsit said:
Something like handpaws would be non-humanoid hands, which I can see fitting the second and fourth example, but those are the outlier, something different worth tagging, rather than the norm that applies to the majority of anthros and humanoids.

Huh, didn't know we had that tag. I was actually going to suggest making a tag for the exceptions since humanoid hands are so common, but it seems it already exists. Fair enough, then.

This still raises the question of what to do with the humanoid hands tag, though. There is also humanoid anatomy on feral.