Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #12438 has been rejected.
create implication toeless_thigh_highs (1311) -> thigh_highs (164876)
Reason: All cases of toeless_thigh_highs are also cases of thigh_highs
EDIT: The bulk update request #12438 (forum #470067) has been rejected by @Wanii.
Updated by auto moderator
You don't need both an implication and a BUR
snpthecat said:
You don't need both an implication and a BUR
Oh sorry, I didnt knew they would have the same effect
I guess one of them can be removed then
wanii said:
I guess one of them can be removed then
You can reject either one by going up to the OP of either thread and clicking the bulk update request #12438 or implication #69847, depending on which one you decide to reject. (Obviously, you don't need to reject both.)
The bulk update request #12438 (forum #470067) has been rejected by @Wanii.
