Topic: [APPROVED] Tag implication: cum_on_own_belly -> cum_on_self

The tag implication #69421 cum_on_own_belly -> cum_on_self has been approved.

Reason: Consistency with other

cum_on_own_*

tags

EDIT: The tag implication cum_on_own_belly -> cum_on_self (forum #469193) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #12407 is active.

create implication cum_on_own_belly (1124) -> cum_on_belly (18964)

Reason: also

EDIT: The bulk update request #12407 (forum #469194) has been approved by @spe.

What about cum on own abdomen, which seems to have implications?
Also should cum on belly be the only tag to imply cum on body?

snpthecat said:
What about cum on own abdomen, which seems to have implications?

So this tag does have implications and I did consider using it before finding cum on own belly, but it has zero posts actually under the tag. Something must've happened to it along the way...

imfac said:
So this tag does have implications and I did consider using it before finding cum on own belly, but it has zero posts actually under the tag. Something must've happened to it along the way...

There was some movement not too long ago to standardize on using "belly" for the abdomen/stomach more generally with these kinds of tags. cum_on_belly, blue_belly, and similar tags sometimes implied belly, where the belly tag referred to an enlarged midsection (slightly chubby or larger), creating problems if you wanted to tag something for a more flat belly/midsection.

The tag implication cum_on_own_belly -> cum_on_self (forum #469193) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #12407 (forum #469194) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #12417 is pending approval.

remove implication cum_on_own_abdomen (0) -> cum_on_self (43588)

Reason: Unused tag, and we have cum_on_own_belly for it