Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #12343 is pending approval.
create alias segmented_legs (316) -> segmented_limbs (2)
create alias segmented_arms (453) -> segmented_limbs (2)
Reason: Legs aren't the only limbs that can be segmented, and I don't see the purpose of having a separate tag just for them.
I'm not sure if this should also implicate segmented_body or not.
Don't know how necessary this simplification is, but including segmented_arms here seems logical.
There are no aliases from *_arm (or leg, or other limbs) to *_limb
So let's move on to the next question: Since we're keeping the tag, what should it imply, if any?
You certainly can imply *_arm to *_limb, like in the case of multi_arm. But the more common case is keeping things separate/not introducing a *_limb counterpart tag. And no, *_arm seems not to imply *_body.
snpthecat said:
There are no aliases from *_arm (or leg, or other limbs) to *_limb
I think this is a valid case for an exception. The important part is the segmented joints, which can exist on any limb. What is the purpose of distinguishing between different types of segmented limbs?
A segmented_joints tag might be a better target, actually.
waydence said:
Don't know how necessary this simplification is, but including segmented_arms here seems logical.
Wasn't aware that tag existed. I'll add it.
