Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #12327 is pending approval.
create alias laito (114) -> laito_(haru272) (0)
mass update haru272 -> laito_(haru272)
create alias rexo_(haru272) (0) -> rexo_blazer (2)
Reason: Clearing up who these characters are. The last one is preemptive because people might not dig deep enough to find out the character's full name but know who he belongs to.
Update: OK apparently Laito also has a full name, Laito Starr Moonlight, and Rexo has an even fuller name, Rexo Blazer Neonlight. That... seems excessive, but now I'm not sure what to do. What's our policy on firstname_(creator) vs. firstname_lastname?
errorist said:
Update: OK apparently Laito also has a full name, Laito Starr Moonlight, and Rexo has an even fuller name, Rexo Blazer Neonlight. That... seems excessive, but now I'm not sure what to do. What's our policy on firstname_(creator) vs. firstname_lastname?
The general policy is firstname_lastname if known, or if they don't have a known last name, just firstname is it's unique enough. firstname_(owner) should only be used if the first name alone is potentially ambiguous, in which case firstname should not be aliased to firstname_(owner) since it would cause a mistag anytime someone tags firstname meaning a different character.
firstname_(owner) can be aliased to firstname_lastname if the character's last name isn't commonly known and they're more well known by just their first name and their owner.
