Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: young_femboy -> femboy

The tag implication #69280 young -> femboy has been rejected.

Reason: self-explanatory

EDIT: The tag implication young_femboy -> femboy (forum #467606) has been rejected by @spe.

Looks like this tag was purely created by you. We don't need that many young_* tags, and I'm not sure if this one is necessary. That said, I've made such tags before (topic #39196). Whether this implication gets approved can be used to determine the validity of the tag.
A specific question of validity here is if this tag has significant use not covered by femboy young_male, though I guess femboy covers andropmorph and maleherm too. (On that note, if you're going to be adding tags like this, please add the corresponding young_gender tag too).

The bulk update request #12264 is active.

create alias young_femboy (6) -> young (279218)

Reason: Femboy is still not a gender or form

OP is the BTR

EDIT: The bulk update request #12264 (forum #467611) has been approved by @spe.

The tag implication young_femboy -> femboy (forum #467606) has been rejected by @spe.

The bulk update request #12264 (forum #467611) has been approved by @spe.

scth said:
Looks like this tag was purely created by you. We don't need that many young_* tags, and I'm not sure if this one is necessary. That said, I've made such tags before (topic #39196). Whether this implication gets approved can be used to determine the validity of the tag.
A specific question of validity here is if this tag has significant use not covered by femboy young_male, though I guess femboy covers andropmorph and maleherm too. (On that note, if you're going to be adding tags like this, please add the corresponding young_gender tag too).

My reasoning for it was that posts under a query like age_difference young femboy are almost entirely with the femboy being the *younger* character, and I not aware of any way to specifically find posts where the femboy character is the older character in an age_difference pairing.

Though I understand that it's too specific, sorry about that.