Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #12188 is pending approval.
mass update embarrased_horny -> embarrassed_horny
Reason: Spelling of embarrassed is incorrect in the original tag.
Until we decide on what to do with the tag, we should correct the spelling to prevent more posts being affected.
Should be aliased rather than just updated, missing the second s (and/or the second r) is a common typo
I'd also question if we need this tag at all, if we do it also needs implications
donovan_dmc said:
Should be aliased rather than just updated, missing the second s (and/or the second r) is a common typo
I'd also question if we need this tag at all, if we do it also needs implications
I left the implication out as it was already on another BUR - https://e621.net/bulk_update_requests/11903 - But a discussion was happening on what we should even do with the tag.
But then, after checking further, turns out the mass update was also already raised: https://e621.net/bulk_update_requests/11903
So, this one is a dupe, although it didn't get marked as such for some reason. Either way, I think this one can be safely ignored. My bad!
wispthehusky said:
So, this one is a dupe, although it didn't get marked as such for some reason. Either way, I think this one can be safely ignored. My bad!
Mass updates don't get marked as duplicates, to my knowledge.
beholding said:
Mass updates don't get marked as duplicates, to my knowledge.
Good to know. Makes sense - mass updates are likely to be needed more than once in some cases without them being duplicate reasons.
It appears this mod needs to brush up on their janitorial understanding just a 'lil bit more. Until then, I'll stick to trying to corral the users. Thanks! :P
wispthehusky said:
I left the implication out as it was already on another BUR - https://e621.net/bulk_update_requests/11903
You mean https://e621.net/forum_topics/56894?page=1#forum_post_449832 ?
So, this one is a dupe, although it didn't get marked as such for some reason. Either way, I think this one can be safely ignored. My bad!
All BUR actions don't show dupes because they don't interact with each other (aliases, implications and other BURs), so there's no point. And if a line in a BUR is the same as one in another BUR, both could be used for different purposes. Exact BUR matches are somewhat rare, so there's not really a point in checking for them.
Though I suspect the main reason is because there's no way to properly search BURs
