Topic: Hugging body parts

The bulk update request #12172 is pending approval.

create alias hugging_legs (270) -> leg_hug (304)
create alias hugging_leg (129) -> leg_hug (304)
create alias hugging_belly (135) -> belly_hug (178)
create alias hugging_arm (73) -> arm_hug (93)
create alias hugging_breasts (39) -> breast_hug (91) # has blocking transitive relationships, cannot be applied through bur
create alias hugging_breast (5) -> breast_hug (91)
create alias boob_hug (5) -> breast_hug (91)
create alias hugging_head (23) -> head_hug (9)
create alias face_hugging (263) -> face_hug (9)
create alias hugging_tongue (51) -> tongue_hug (48)

Reason: Same meaning.

I see that pamadan had made an alias request 1 year ago, but I disagree with this alias request at topic #45898.

cabo27judy said:
I see that pamadan had made an alias request 1 year ago, but I disagree with this alias request at topic #45898.

I disagree with your disagreement. [bodypart]_hug can be ambiguous is whether it means being hugged by that [bodypart] or hugging that [bodypart]. For example, wing hug.
The precedent (as seen by the implications to hugging another) are to use hugging_*

Related: topic #45333 and topic #44317

The bulk update request #12175 is pending approval.

create alias leg_hug (304) -> hugging_legs (270)
create implication hugging_legs (270) -> hug (64830)
create alias hugging_leg (129) -> hugging_legs (270)
create alias belly_hug (178) -> hugging_belly (135)
create implication hugging_belly (135) -> hug (64830)
create alias breast_hug (91) -> hugging_breasts (39) # duplicate of alias #71892
create alias hugging_breast (5) -> hugging_breasts (39)
create alias boob_hug (5) -> hugging_breasts (39)
create implication hugging_breasts (39) -> hug (64830)
create implication hugging_breasts (39) -> breasts (2046394)
create alias head_hug (9) -> hugging_head (23)
create alias face_hug (9) -> hugging_head (23)
create alias face_hugging (263) -> hugging_head (23)
create implication hugging_head (23) -> hug (64830)
create alias tongue_hug (48) -> hugging_tongue (51)
create implication hugging_tongue (51) -> hug (64830)
create implication hugging_tongue (51) -> tongue (1004324)

Reason: I don't think we need to distinguish between hugging one leg or two
Hugging the face is still the same as hugging the head

Do we need the hugging_own_* and hugging_another's_* variants of these tags?

This feels like a hug(e) undertaking

The bulk update request #12176 is pending approval.

remove alias hugging_self (0) -> self_hug (239)

Reason:
Keeping consistency
followup:
alias self_hug -> hugging_self
imply hugging_self -> hug

The bulk update request #12177 is pending approval.

remove implication hugging_balls (152) -> hugging_another (10083)

Reason: You can hug your own right?

followup:
imply hugging_balls -> hug

The bulk update request #12178 is pending approval.

remove implication hugging_butt (706) -> hugging_another (10083)
remove implication hugging_from_behind (4671) -> hugging_another (10083)

Reason: The more controversial unimplications. You could theoretically hug your own butt / hug from behind if you're really long

followup:
imply hugging_from_behind -> hug
imply hugging_butt -> hug

Oh and one last question, should wing hug stay as is, or be changed to hugged by wings?

The bulk update request #12180 is pending approval.

remove implication wing_hug (278) -> wings (472103)
remove implication wing_hold (35) -> wings (472103)
create implication using_wings (330) -> wings (472103)

Reason: Tangential BUR while we're at it
Rerouting the implication to using_wings (if you're using wings, wings must be present (i hope))

#

snpthecat said:
Oh and one last question, should wing hug stay as is, or be changed to hugged by wings?

Maybe the latter, if we're aliasing x_hug to hugging_x it'd be confusing that wing_hug specifically means something different than the others. Or perhaps hugging_with_wings.

snpthecat said:
Rerouting the implication to using_wings (if you're using wings, wings must be present (i hope))

Using wings sounds like a weird tag. A character that's flying or stretching their wings can be said to be "using their wings", so it's not really clear where the distinction is.